Cargando…
Prevalence of Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Private Drinking Water Wells in Maryland, USA
Although many U.S. homes rely on private wells, few studies have investigated the quality of these water sources. This cross-sectional study evaluated private well water quality in Maryland, and explored possible environmental sources that could impact water quality. Well water samples (n = 118) wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081686 |
_version_ | 1783352464906387456 |
---|---|
author | Murray, Rianna T. Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. Maring, Elisabeth F. Pee, Daphne G. Aspinwall, Karen Wilson, Sacoby M. Sapkota, Amy R. |
author_facet | Murray, Rianna T. Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. Maring, Elisabeth F. Pee, Daphne G. Aspinwall, Karen Wilson, Sacoby M. Sapkota, Amy R. |
author_sort | Murray, Rianna T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although many U.S. homes rely on private wells, few studies have investigated the quality of these water sources. This cross-sectional study evaluated private well water quality in Maryland, and explored possible environmental sources that could impact water quality. Well water samples (n = 118) were collected in four Maryland counties and were analyzed for microbiological and chemical contaminants. Data from the U.S. Census of Agriculture were used to evaluate associations between the presence of animal feeding operations and well water quality at the zip code level using logistic regression. Overall, 43.2% of tested wells did not meet at least one federal health-based drinking water standard. Total coliforms, fecal coliforms, enterococci, and Escherichia coli were detected in 25.4%, 15.3%, 5.1%, and 3.4% of tested wells, respectively. Approximately 26%, 3.4%, and <1% of wells did not meet standards for pH, nitrate-N, and total dissolved solids, respectively. There were no statistically significant associations between the presence of cattle, dairy, broiler, turkey, or aquaculture operations and the detection of fecal indicator bacteria in tested wells. In conclusion, nearly half of tested wells did not meet federal health-based drinking water standards, and additional research is needed to evaluate factors that impact well water quality. However, homeowner education on well water testing and well maintenance could be important for public health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6121425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61214252018-09-07 Prevalence of Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Private Drinking Water Wells in Maryland, USA Murray, Rianna T. Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. Maring, Elisabeth F. Pee, Daphne G. Aspinwall, Karen Wilson, Sacoby M. Sapkota, Amy R. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Although many U.S. homes rely on private wells, few studies have investigated the quality of these water sources. This cross-sectional study evaluated private well water quality in Maryland, and explored possible environmental sources that could impact water quality. Well water samples (n = 118) were collected in four Maryland counties and were analyzed for microbiological and chemical contaminants. Data from the U.S. Census of Agriculture were used to evaluate associations between the presence of animal feeding operations and well water quality at the zip code level using logistic regression. Overall, 43.2% of tested wells did not meet at least one federal health-based drinking water standard. Total coliforms, fecal coliforms, enterococci, and Escherichia coli were detected in 25.4%, 15.3%, 5.1%, and 3.4% of tested wells, respectively. Approximately 26%, 3.4%, and <1% of wells did not meet standards for pH, nitrate-N, and total dissolved solids, respectively. There were no statistically significant associations between the presence of cattle, dairy, broiler, turkey, or aquaculture operations and the detection of fecal indicator bacteria in tested wells. In conclusion, nearly half of tested wells did not meet federal health-based drinking water standards, and additional research is needed to evaluate factors that impact well water quality. However, homeowner education on well water testing and well maintenance could be important for public health. MDPI 2018-08-07 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6121425/ /pubmed/30087312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081686 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Murray, Rianna T. Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. Maring, Elisabeth F. Pee, Daphne G. Aspinwall, Karen Wilson, Sacoby M. Sapkota, Amy R. Prevalence of Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Private Drinking Water Wells in Maryland, USA |
title | Prevalence of Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Private Drinking Water Wells in Maryland, USA |
title_full | Prevalence of Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Private Drinking Water Wells in Maryland, USA |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Private Drinking Water Wells in Maryland, USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Private Drinking Water Wells in Maryland, USA |
title_short | Prevalence of Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Private Drinking Water Wells in Maryland, USA |
title_sort | prevalence of microbiological and chemical contaminants in private drinking water wells in maryland, usa |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murrayriannat prevalenceofmicrobiologicalandchemicalcontaminantsinprivatedrinkingwaterwellsinmarylandusa AT rosenberggoldsteinrachele prevalenceofmicrobiologicalandchemicalcontaminantsinprivatedrinkingwaterwellsinmarylandusa AT maringelisabethf prevalenceofmicrobiologicalandchemicalcontaminantsinprivatedrinkingwaterwellsinmarylandusa AT peedaphneg prevalenceofmicrobiologicalandchemicalcontaminantsinprivatedrinkingwaterwellsinmarylandusa AT aspinwallkaren prevalenceofmicrobiologicalandchemicalcontaminantsinprivatedrinkingwaterwellsinmarylandusa AT wilsonsacobym prevalenceofmicrobiologicalandchemicalcontaminantsinprivatedrinkingwaterwellsinmarylandusa AT sapkotaamyr prevalenceofmicrobiologicalandchemicalcontaminantsinprivatedrinkingwaterwellsinmarylandusa |