Cargando…

Focus on biosimilar etanercept – bioequivalence and interchangeability

BACKGROUND: The recent approval of reference etanercept (re-ETN) biosimilars SB4, GP2015, and HD203 produced relevant changes in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis due to the considerably lower cost of these products and the consequent saving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cantini, Fabrizio, Benucci, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214149
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S126854
_version_ 1783352532387495936
author Cantini, Fabrizio
Benucci, Maurizio
author_facet Cantini, Fabrizio
Benucci, Maurizio
author_sort Cantini, Fabrizio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recent approval of reference etanercept (re-ETN) biosimilars SB4, GP2015, and HD203 produced relevant changes in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis due to the considerably lower cost of these products and the consequent savings. AIMS: To review the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of ETN biosimilars when employed as first-line therapy or after transition from re-ETN. Patients’ acceptability was also addressed. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The available literature was reviewed through a search of PubMed database, and abstract books of the American College for Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism annual meetings. SB4, GP2015, and HD203 were licensed by the US, European and South Korea regulatory agencies after the bioequivalence to re-ETN was demonstrated through pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, and randomized, head to head, controlled trials. Based on the evidence of efficacy and safety of SB4 and HD203 in RA, and of GP2015 in psoriasis, by the extrapolation principle, the three biosimilars were approved for all indications licensed for re-ETN, and the regulatory agencies introduced the interchangeability from the originator to the biosimilar. Extrapolation of indications, and particularly interchangeability raised relevant concerns among the rheumatologists due to the low level of evidence supporting the switching strategy (or transition). Rheumatologists’ concerns are oriented toward the relevant number of biosimilar discontinuations after the transition ranging from 7%–17% over a short-term follow-up period. As resulted from two studies, at least 20%–30% of the patients claimed more exhaustive information on the switching procedure. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, re-ETN biosimilars may be a good option as first-line therapy, while further data are needed to definitively establish the efficacy, safety, and the economic reflexes of transitioning from re-ETN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6121755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61217552018-09-13 Focus on biosimilar etanercept – bioequivalence and interchangeability Cantini, Fabrizio Benucci, Maurizio Biologics Review BACKGROUND: The recent approval of reference etanercept (re-ETN) biosimilars SB4, GP2015, and HD203 produced relevant changes in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis due to the considerably lower cost of these products and the consequent savings. AIMS: To review the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of ETN biosimilars when employed as first-line therapy or after transition from re-ETN. Patients’ acceptability was also addressed. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The available literature was reviewed through a search of PubMed database, and abstract books of the American College for Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism annual meetings. SB4, GP2015, and HD203 were licensed by the US, European and South Korea regulatory agencies after the bioequivalence to re-ETN was demonstrated through pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, and randomized, head to head, controlled trials. Based on the evidence of efficacy and safety of SB4 and HD203 in RA, and of GP2015 in psoriasis, by the extrapolation principle, the three biosimilars were approved for all indications licensed for re-ETN, and the regulatory agencies introduced the interchangeability from the originator to the biosimilar. Extrapolation of indications, and particularly interchangeability raised relevant concerns among the rheumatologists due to the low level of evidence supporting the switching strategy (or transition). Rheumatologists’ concerns are oriented toward the relevant number of biosimilar discontinuations after the transition ranging from 7%–17% over a short-term follow-up period. As resulted from two studies, at least 20%–30% of the patients claimed more exhaustive information on the switching procedure. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, re-ETN biosimilars may be a good option as first-line therapy, while further data are needed to definitively establish the efficacy, safety, and the economic reflexes of transitioning from re-ETN. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6121755/ /pubmed/30214149 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S126854 Text en © 2018 Cantini and Benucci. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Cantini, Fabrizio
Benucci, Maurizio
Focus on biosimilar etanercept – bioequivalence and interchangeability
title Focus on biosimilar etanercept – bioequivalence and interchangeability
title_full Focus on biosimilar etanercept – bioequivalence and interchangeability
title_fullStr Focus on biosimilar etanercept – bioequivalence and interchangeability
title_full_unstemmed Focus on biosimilar etanercept – bioequivalence and interchangeability
title_short Focus on biosimilar etanercept – bioequivalence and interchangeability
title_sort focus on biosimilar etanercept – bioequivalence and interchangeability
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214149
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S126854
work_keys_str_mv AT cantinifabrizio focusonbiosimilaretanerceptbioequivalenceandinterchangeability
AT benuccimaurizio focusonbiosimilaretanerceptbioequivalenceandinterchangeability