Cargando…

Speciation genes are more likely to have discordant gene trees

Speciation genes are responsible for reproductive isolation between species. By directly participating in the process of speciation, the genealogies of isolating loci have been thought to more faithfully represent species trees. The unique properties of speciation genes may provide valuable evolutio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Richard J., Hahn, Matthew W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.77
_version_ 1783352542970773504
author Wang, Richard J.
Hahn, Matthew W.
author_facet Wang, Richard J.
Hahn, Matthew W.
author_sort Wang, Richard J.
collection PubMed
description Speciation genes are responsible for reproductive isolation between species. By directly participating in the process of speciation, the genealogies of isolating loci have been thought to more faithfully represent species trees. The unique properties of speciation genes may provide valuable evolutionary insights and help determine the true history of species divergence. Here, we formally analyze whether genealogies from loci participating in Dobzhansky–Muller (DM) incompatibilities are more likely to be concordant with the species tree under incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). Individual loci differ stochastically from the true history of divergence with a predictable frequency due to ILS, and these expectations—combined with the DM model of intrinsic reproductive isolation from epistatic interactions—can be used to examine the probability of concordance at isolating loci. Contrary to existing verbal models, we find that reproductively isolating loci that follow the DM model are often more likely to have discordant gene trees. These results are dependent on the pattern of isolation observed between three species, the time between speciation events, and the time since the last speciation event. Results supporting a higher probability of discordance are found for both derived–derived and derived–ancestral DM pairs, and regardless of whether incompatibilities are allowed or prohibited from segregating in the same population. Our overall results suggest that DM loci are unlikely to be especially useful for reconstructing species relationships, even in the presence of gene flow between incipient species, and may in fact be positively misleading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6121824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61218242018-10-03 Speciation genes are more likely to have discordant gene trees Wang, Richard J. Hahn, Matthew W. Evol Lett Letters Speciation genes are responsible for reproductive isolation between species. By directly participating in the process of speciation, the genealogies of isolating loci have been thought to more faithfully represent species trees. The unique properties of speciation genes may provide valuable evolutionary insights and help determine the true history of species divergence. Here, we formally analyze whether genealogies from loci participating in Dobzhansky–Muller (DM) incompatibilities are more likely to be concordant with the species tree under incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). Individual loci differ stochastically from the true history of divergence with a predictable frequency due to ILS, and these expectations—combined with the DM model of intrinsic reproductive isolation from epistatic interactions—can be used to examine the probability of concordance at isolating loci. Contrary to existing verbal models, we find that reproductively isolating loci that follow the DM model are often more likely to have discordant gene trees. These results are dependent on the pattern of isolation observed between three species, the time between speciation events, and the time since the last speciation event. Results supporting a higher probability of discordance are found for both derived–derived and derived–ancestral DM pairs, and regardless of whether incompatibilities are allowed or prohibited from segregating in the same population. Our overall results suggest that DM loci are unlikely to be especially useful for reconstructing species relationships, even in the presence of gene flow between incipient species, and may in fact be positively misleading. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6121824/ /pubmed/30283682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.77 Text en © 2018, Society for the Study of Evolution This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Wang, Richard J.
Hahn, Matthew W.
Speciation genes are more likely to have discordant gene trees
title Speciation genes are more likely to have discordant gene trees
title_full Speciation genes are more likely to have discordant gene trees
title_fullStr Speciation genes are more likely to have discordant gene trees
title_full_unstemmed Speciation genes are more likely to have discordant gene trees
title_short Speciation genes are more likely to have discordant gene trees
title_sort speciation genes are more likely to have discordant gene trees
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.77
work_keys_str_mv AT wangrichardj speciationgenesaremorelikelytohavediscordantgenetrees
AT hahnmattheww speciationgenesaremorelikelytohavediscordantgenetrees