Cargando…

Why some mothers overestimate birth size and length of pregnancy in rural Nepal

BACKGROUND: Quantitative validation studies alone may not be able to distinguish between instances when participants did not accurately report an event vs when participants did not understand a question. We used an explanatory qualitative study design to acquire an in-depth understanding of why some...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Karen T, Mullany, Luke C, Khatry, Subarna K, LeClerq, Steven C, Munos, Melinda K, Katz, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206478
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.020801
_version_ 1783352568064245760
author Chang, Karen T
Mullany, Luke C
Khatry, Subarna K
LeClerq, Steven C
Munos, Melinda K
Katz, Joanne
author_facet Chang, Karen T
Mullany, Luke C
Khatry, Subarna K
LeClerq, Steven C
Munos, Melinda K
Katz, Joanne
author_sort Chang, Karen T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantitative validation studies alone may not be able to distinguish between instances when participants did not accurately report an event vs when participants did not understand a question. We used an explanatory qualitative study design to acquire an in-depth understanding of why some mothers in rural Nepal overestimate birth size of their newborn and their length of pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted two focus group discussions (FGDs) with study staff who administered a quantitative questionnaire and 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with mothers who had participated in a quantitative validation study. Transcripts were coded and analyzed for themes in patterns of meaning within and across FGDs and IDIs. Using this thematic map, we synthesized our data into common and divergent responses from participants to facilitate our interpretation of the quantitative findings. RESULTS: We identified five themes specific to this analysis: difficulties with the length of pregnancy question, challenges in administering the birth size question, the perceived effect of time since birth on mothers’ ability to remember information, the language and style differences specific to this setting, and the study context shaping the relationship between study staff and mothers who participated and how this may have influenced mothers’ responses. Visual aids may help to scale the question about birth size within a cultural frame of reference for maternal reports to be more interpretable. Among both study staff and mothers, a longer period of time since the birth of a child was thought to be associated with diminished accuracy of maternal reports, a perception not supported by our previously published quantitative findings. CONCLUSIONS: Poor validity of low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth indicators based on maternal reports may be partly attributed to challenges in maternal understanding of questions assessing birth size and length of pregnancy. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings regarding maternal comprehension and to further evaluate the utility of visual aids developed for this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Edinburgh University Global Health Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61220072018-09-11 Why some mothers overestimate birth size and length of pregnancy in rural Nepal Chang, Karen T Mullany, Luke C Khatry, Subarna K LeClerq, Steven C Munos, Melinda K Katz, Joanne J Glob Health Research Theme 4: Improving Coverage Measurement BACKGROUND: Quantitative validation studies alone may not be able to distinguish between instances when participants did not accurately report an event vs when participants did not understand a question. We used an explanatory qualitative study design to acquire an in-depth understanding of why some mothers in rural Nepal overestimate birth size of their newborn and their length of pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted two focus group discussions (FGDs) with study staff who administered a quantitative questionnaire and 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with mothers who had participated in a quantitative validation study. Transcripts were coded and analyzed for themes in patterns of meaning within and across FGDs and IDIs. Using this thematic map, we synthesized our data into common and divergent responses from participants to facilitate our interpretation of the quantitative findings. RESULTS: We identified five themes specific to this analysis: difficulties with the length of pregnancy question, challenges in administering the birth size question, the perceived effect of time since birth on mothers’ ability to remember information, the language and style differences specific to this setting, and the study context shaping the relationship between study staff and mothers who participated and how this may have influenced mothers’ responses. Visual aids may help to scale the question about birth size within a cultural frame of reference for maternal reports to be more interpretable. Among both study staff and mothers, a longer period of time since the birth of a child was thought to be associated with diminished accuracy of maternal reports, a perception not supported by our previously published quantitative findings. CONCLUSIONS: Poor validity of low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth indicators based on maternal reports may be partly attributed to challenges in maternal understanding of questions assessing birth size and length of pregnancy. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings regarding maternal comprehension and to further evaluate the utility of visual aids developed for this study. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2018-12 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6122007/ /pubmed/30206478 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.020801 Text en Copyright © 2018 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Theme 4: Improving Coverage Measurement
Chang, Karen T
Mullany, Luke C
Khatry, Subarna K
LeClerq, Steven C
Munos, Melinda K
Katz, Joanne
Why some mothers overestimate birth size and length of pregnancy in rural Nepal
title Why some mothers overestimate birth size and length of pregnancy in rural Nepal
title_full Why some mothers overestimate birth size and length of pregnancy in rural Nepal
title_fullStr Why some mothers overestimate birth size and length of pregnancy in rural Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Why some mothers overestimate birth size and length of pregnancy in rural Nepal
title_short Why some mothers overestimate birth size and length of pregnancy in rural Nepal
title_sort why some mothers overestimate birth size and length of pregnancy in rural nepal
topic Research Theme 4: Improving Coverage Measurement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30206478
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.020801
work_keys_str_mv AT changkarent whysomemothersoverestimatebirthsizeandlengthofpregnancyinruralnepal
AT mullanylukec whysomemothersoverestimatebirthsizeandlengthofpregnancyinruralnepal
AT khatrysubarnak whysomemothersoverestimatebirthsizeandlengthofpregnancyinruralnepal
AT leclerqstevenc whysomemothersoverestimatebirthsizeandlengthofpregnancyinruralnepal
AT munosmelindak whysomemothersoverestimatebirthsizeandlengthofpregnancyinruralnepal
AT katzjoanne whysomemothersoverestimatebirthsizeandlengthofpregnancyinruralnepal