Cargando…

No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric Heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions

Mechanisms that suppress recombination are known to help maintain species barriers by preventing the breakup of coadapted gene combinations. The sympatric butterfly species Heliconius melpomene and Heliconius cydno are separated by many strong barriers, but the species still hybridize infrequently i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davey, John W., Barker, Sarah L., Rastas, Pasi M., Pinharanda, Ana, Martin, Simon H., Durbin, Richard, McMillan, W. Owen, Merrill, Richard M., Jiggins, Chris D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.12
_version_ 1783352588274499584
author Davey, John W.
Barker, Sarah L.
Rastas, Pasi M.
Pinharanda, Ana
Martin, Simon H.
Durbin, Richard
McMillan, W. Owen
Merrill, Richard M.
Jiggins, Chris D.
author_facet Davey, John W.
Barker, Sarah L.
Rastas, Pasi M.
Pinharanda, Ana
Martin, Simon H.
Durbin, Richard
McMillan, W. Owen
Merrill, Richard M.
Jiggins, Chris D.
author_sort Davey, John W.
collection PubMed
description Mechanisms that suppress recombination are known to help maintain species barriers by preventing the breakup of coadapted gene combinations. The sympatric butterfly species Heliconius melpomene and Heliconius cydno are separated by many strong barriers, but the species still hybridize infrequently in the wild, and around 40% of the genome is influenced by introgression. We tested the hypothesis that genetic barriers between the species are maintained by inversions or other mechanisms that reduce between‐species recombination rate. We constructed fine‐scale recombination maps for Panamanian populations of both species and their hybrids to directly measure recombination rate within and between species, and generated long sequence reads to detect inversions. We find no evidence for a systematic reduction in recombination rates in F1 hybrids, and also no evidence for inversions longer than 50 kb that might be involved in generating or maintaining species barriers. This suggests that mechanisms leading to global or local reduction in recombination do not play a significant role in the maintenance of species barriers between H. melpomene and H. cydno.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61221232018-10-03 No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric Heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions Davey, John W. Barker, Sarah L. Rastas, Pasi M. Pinharanda, Ana Martin, Simon H. Durbin, Richard McMillan, W. Owen Merrill, Richard M. Jiggins, Chris D. Evol Lett Letters Mechanisms that suppress recombination are known to help maintain species barriers by preventing the breakup of coadapted gene combinations. The sympatric butterfly species Heliconius melpomene and Heliconius cydno are separated by many strong barriers, but the species still hybridize infrequently in the wild, and around 40% of the genome is influenced by introgression. We tested the hypothesis that genetic barriers between the species are maintained by inversions or other mechanisms that reduce between‐species recombination rate. We constructed fine‐scale recombination maps for Panamanian populations of both species and their hybrids to directly measure recombination rate within and between species, and generated long sequence reads to detect inversions. We find no evidence for a systematic reduction in recombination rates in F1 hybrids, and also no evidence for inversions longer than 50 kb that might be involved in generating or maintaining species barriers. This suggests that mechanisms leading to global or local reduction in recombination do not play a significant role in the maintenance of species barriers between H. melpomene and H. cydno. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6122123/ /pubmed/30283645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.12 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Davey, John W.
Barker, Sarah L.
Rastas, Pasi M.
Pinharanda, Ana
Martin, Simon H.
Durbin, Richard
McMillan, W. Owen
Merrill, Richard M.
Jiggins, Chris D.
No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric Heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions
title No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric Heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions
title_full No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric Heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions
title_fullStr No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric Heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric Heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions
title_short No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric Heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions
title_sort no evidence for maintenance of a sympatric heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.12
work_keys_str_mv AT daveyjohnw noevidenceformaintenanceofasympatricheliconiusspeciesbarrierbychromosomalinversions
AT barkersarahl noevidenceformaintenanceofasympatricheliconiusspeciesbarrierbychromosomalinversions
AT rastaspasim noevidenceformaintenanceofasympatricheliconiusspeciesbarrierbychromosomalinversions
AT pinharandaana noevidenceformaintenanceofasympatricheliconiusspeciesbarrierbychromosomalinversions
AT martinsimonh noevidenceformaintenanceofasympatricheliconiusspeciesbarrierbychromosomalinversions
AT durbinrichard noevidenceformaintenanceofasympatricheliconiusspeciesbarrierbychromosomalinversions
AT mcmillanwowen noevidenceformaintenanceofasympatricheliconiusspeciesbarrierbychromosomalinversions
AT merrillrichardm noevidenceformaintenanceofasympatricheliconiusspeciesbarrierbychromosomalinversions
AT jigginschrisd noevidenceformaintenanceofasympatricheliconiusspeciesbarrierbychromosomalinversions