Cargando…

Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) are faced with complex management decisions. Watchful waiting, surgical resection, and radiation are all viable options with associated risks and benefits. We sought to determine if patients with VS experience decisional conflict when deciding be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham, M. Elise, Westerberg, Brian D., Lea, Jane, Hong, Paul, Walling, Simon, Morris, David P., Hebb, Andrea L. O., Galleto, Rochelle, Papsin, Emily, Mulroy, Maeve, Foggin, Hannah, Bance, Manohar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0297-4
_version_ 1783352606300569600
author Graham, M. Elise
Westerberg, Brian D.
Lea, Jane
Hong, Paul
Walling, Simon
Morris, David P.
Hebb, Andrea L. O.
Galleto, Rochelle
Papsin, Emily
Mulroy, Maeve
Foggin, Hannah
Bance, Manohar
author_facet Graham, M. Elise
Westerberg, Brian D.
Lea, Jane
Hong, Paul
Walling, Simon
Morris, David P.
Hebb, Andrea L. O.
Galleto, Rochelle
Papsin, Emily
Mulroy, Maeve
Foggin, Hannah
Bance, Manohar
author_sort Graham, M. Elise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) are faced with complex management decisions. Watchful waiting, surgical resection, and radiation are all viable options with associated risks and benefits. We sought to determine if patients with VS experience decisional conflict when deciding between surgery or non-surgical management, and factors influencing the degree of decisional conflict. METHODS: A prospective cohort study in two tertiary ambulatory skull-base clinics was performed. Patients with newly diagnosed or newly growing vestibular schwannomas were recruited. Patients were given a demographic form and the decisional conflict scale (DCS), a validated measure to assess the degree of uncertainty when making medical decisions. The degree of shared decision making (SDM) experienced by the patient and physician were assessed via the SDM-Q-10 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires, respectively. Non-parametric statistics were used. Questionnaires and demographic information were correlated with DCS using Spearman correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors independently associated with DCS scores. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients participated (55% female, aged 37–81 years); VS ranged in size from 2 mm–50 mm. Significant decisional conflict (DCS score 25 or greater) was experienced by 17 (22%) patients. Patients reported an average SDM-Q-10 score of 86, indicating highly perceived level of SDM. Physician and patient SDM scores were weakly correlated (p = 0.045, Spearman correlation coefficient 0.234). DCS scores were significantly negatively correlated with a decision to pursue surgery, presence of a trainee, and higher SDM-Q-10 score. DCS was higher with female gender. Using logistic regression, the SDM-Q-10 score was the only variable associated with significantly reduced DCS. CONCLUSIONS: About one fifth of patients deciding how to manage their vestibular schwannoma experienced a significant degree of decisional conflict. Involving the patients in the process through shared decision-making significantly reduced the degree of uncertainty patients experienced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61222062018-09-05 Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: a prospective cohort study Graham, M. Elise Westerberg, Brian D. Lea, Jane Hong, Paul Walling, Simon Morris, David P. Hebb, Andrea L. O. Galleto, Rochelle Papsin, Emily Mulroy, Maeve Foggin, Hannah Bance, Manohar J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) are faced with complex management decisions. Watchful waiting, surgical resection, and radiation are all viable options with associated risks and benefits. We sought to determine if patients with VS experience decisional conflict when deciding between surgery or non-surgical management, and factors influencing the degree of decisional conflict. METHODS: A prospective cohort study in two tertiary ambulatory skull-base clinics was performed. Patients with newly diagnosed or newly growing vestibular schwannomas were recruited. Patients were given a demographic form and the decisional conflict scale (DCS), a validated measure to assess the degree of uncertainty when making medical decisions. The degree of shared decision making (SDM) experienced by the patient and physician were assessed via the SDM-Q-10 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires, respectively. Non-parametric statistics were used. Questionnaires and demographic information were correlated with DCS using Spearman correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors independently associated with DCS scores. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients participated (55% female, aged 37–81 years); VS ranged in size from 2 mm–50 mm. Significant decisional conflict (DCS score 25 or greater) was experienced by 17 (22%) patients. Patients reported an average SDM-Q-10 score of 86, indicating highly perceived level of SDM. Physician and patient SDM scores were weakly correlated (p = 0.045, Spearman correlation coefficient 0.234). DCS scores were significantly negatively correlated with a decision to pursue surgery, presence of a trainee, and higher SDM-Q-10 score. DCS was higher with female gender. Using logistic regression, the SDM-Q-10 score was the only variable associated with significantly reduced DCS. CONCLUSIONS: About one fifth of patients deciding how to manage their vestibular schwannoma experienced a significant degree of decisional conflict. Involving the patients in the process through shared decision-making significantly reduced the degree of uncertainty patients experienced. BioMed Central 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6122206/ /pubmed/30176947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0297-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Graham, M. Elise
Westerberg, Brian D.
Lea, Jane
Hong, Paul
Walling, Simon
Morris, David P.
Hebb, Andrea L. O.
Galleto, Rochelle
Papsin, Emily
Mulroy, Maeve
Foggin, Hannah
Bance, Manohar
Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: a prospective cohort study
title Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: a prospective cohort study
title_full Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: a prospective cohort study
title_short Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: a prospective cohort study
title_sort shared decision making and decisional conflict in the management of vestibular schwannoma: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0297-4
work_keys_str_mv AT grahammelise shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT westerbergbriand shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT leajane shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT hongpaul shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT wallingsimon shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT morrisdavidp shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT hebbandrealo shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT galletorochelle shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT papsinemily shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT mulroymaeve shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT fogginhannah shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy
AT bancemanohar shareddecisionmakinganddecisionalconflictinthemanagementofvestibularschwannomaaprospectivecohortstudy