Cargando…

The Effect of Aircraft, Road, and Railway Traffic Noise on Stroke – Results of a Case–Control Study Based on Secondary Data

AIM: To examine the stroke risks associated with aircraft, road traffic, and railway noise exposure in a large case–control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All people aged ≥40 years living around the Frankfurt airport that were insured by one of three large statutory health insurance funds between 200...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seidler, Anna Lene, Hegewald, Janice, Schubert, Melanie, Weihofen, Verena Maria, Wagner, Mandy, Dröge, Patrik, Swart, Enno, Zeeb, Hajo, Seidler, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136675
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_7_18
_version_ 1783352618911793152
author Seidler, Anna Lene
Hegewald, Janice
Schubert, Melanie
Weihofen, Verena Maria
Wagner, Mandy
Dröge, Patrik
Swart, Enno
Zeeb, Hajo
Seidler, Andreas
author_facet Seidler, Anna Lene
Hegewald, Janice
Schubert, Melanie
Weihofen, Verena Maria
Wagner, Mandy
Dröge, Patrik
Swart, Enno
Zeeb, Hajo
Seidler, Andreas
author_sort Seidler, Anna Lene
collection PubMed
description AIM: To examine the stroke risks associated with aircraft, road traffic, and railway noise exposure in a large case–control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All people aged ≥40 years living around the Frankfurt airport that were insured by one of three large statutory health insurance funds between 2005 and 2010 were included in the study (n = 1,026,670). Address-specific exposure to aircraft, road, and railway traffic noise was estimated for 2005. We used insurance claim data to identify 25,495 newly diagnosed cases of stroke between 2006 and 2010 and compared them with 827,601 control participants. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios adjusted for age, sex, local proportion of people receiving unemployment benefits, and if available individual indicators of socioeconomic status (education, occupation). RESULTS: For 24-h continuous aircraft noise exposure, neither increased risk estimates nor a positive linear exposure–risk relation was found. However, stroke risk was statistically significantly increased by 7% [95% confidence intervals (95%CI): 2–13%] for people who were exposed to <40 dB of 24-h continuous aircraft noise, but ≥6 events of maximum nightly sound pressure levels ≥50 dB. For road and railway traffic noise, there was a positive linear exposure–risk relation: Per 10 dB the stroke risk increased by 1.7% (95%CI: 0.3–3.2%) for road traffic noise and by 1.8% (95%CI: 0.1–3.3%) for railway traffic noise. The maximum risk increase of 7% (95%CI: 0–14%) for road traffic noise and 18% (95%CI: 2–38%) for railway traffic noise was found in the exposure category ≥65 to <70 dB. CONCLUSION: This large case–control study indicates that traffic noise exposure may lead to an increase in stroke risk. It furthermore suggests that maximum aircraft noise levels at night increase the stroke risk even when continuous noise exposure is low, and thus highlights the relevance of maximum noise levels for research and policies on noise protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61222632018-09-12 The Effect of Aircraft, Road, and Railway Traffic Noise on Stroke – Results of a Case–Control Study Based on Secondary Data Seidler, Anna Lene Hegewald, Janice Schubert, Melanie Weihofen, Verena Maria Wagner, Mandy Dröge, Patrik Swart, Enno Zeeb, Hajo Seidler, Andreas Noise Health Original Article AIM: To examine the stroke risks associated with aircraft, road traffic, and railway noise exposure in a large case–control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All people aged ≥40 years living around the Frankfurt airport that were insured by one of three large statutory health insurance funds between 2005 and 2010 were included in the study (n = 1,026,670). Address-specific exposure to aircraft, road, and railway traffic noise was estimated for 2005. We used insurance claim data to identify 25,495 newly diagnosed cases of stroke between 2006 and 2010 and compared them with 827,601 control participants. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios adjusted for age, sex, local proportion of people receiving unemployment benefits, and if available individual indicators of socioeconomic status (education, occupation). RESULTS: For 24-h continuous aircraft noise exposure, neither increased risk estimates nor a positive linear exposure–risk relation was found. However, stroke risk was statistically significantly increased by 7% [95% confidence intervals (95%CI): 2–13%] for people who were exposed to <40 dB of 24-h continuous aircraft noise, but ≥6 events of maximum nightly sound pressure levels ≥50 dB. For road and railway traffic noise, there was a positive linear exposure–risk relation: Per 10 dB the stroke risk increased by 1.7% (95%CI: 0.3–3.2%) for road traffic noise and by 1.8% (95%CI: 0.1–3.3%) for railway traffic noise. The maximum risk increase of 7% (95%CI: 0–14%) for road traffic noise and 18% (95%CI: 2–38%) for railway traffic noise was found in the exposure category ≥65 to <70 dB. CONCLUSION: This large case–control study indicates that traffic noise exposure may lead to an increase in stroke risk. It furthermore suggests that maximum aircraft noise levels at night increase the stroke risk even when continuous noise exposure is low, and thus highlights the relevance of maximum noise levels for research and policies on noise protection. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6122263/ /pubmed/30136675 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_7_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Seidler, Anna Lene
Hegewald, Janice
Schubert, Melanie
Weihofen, Verena Maria
Wagner, Mandy
Dröge, Patrik
Swart, Enno
Zeeb, Hajo
Seidler, Andreas
The Effect of Aircraft, Road, and Railway Traffic Noise on Stroke – Results of a Case–Control Study Based on Secondary Data
title The Effect of Aircraft, Road, and Railway Traffic Noise on Stroke – Results of a Case–Control Study Based on Secondary Data
title_full The Effect of Aircraft, Road, and Railway Traffic Noise on Stroke – Results of a Case–Control Study Based on Secondary Data
title_fullStr The Effect of Aircraft, Road, and Railway Traffic Noise on Stroke – Results of a Case–Control Study Based on Secondary Data
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Aircraft, Road, and Railway Traffic Noise on Stroke – Results of a Case–Control Study Based on Secondary Data
title_short The Effect of Aircraft, Road, and Railway Traffic Noise on Stroke – Results of a Case–Control Study Based on Secondary Data
title_sort effect of aircraft, road, and railway traffic noise on stroke – results of a case–control study based on secondary data
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136675
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_7_18
work_keys_str_mv AT seidlerannalene theeffectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT hegewaldjanice theeffectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT schubertmelanie theeffectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT weihofenverenamaria theeffectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT wagnermandy theeffectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT drogepatrik theeffectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT swartenno theeffectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT zeebhajo theeffectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT seidlerandreas theeffectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT seidlerannalene effectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT hegewaldjanice effectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT schubertmelanie effectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT weihofenverenamaria effectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT wagnermandy effectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT drogepatrik effectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT swartenno effectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT zeebhajo effectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata
AT seidlerandreas effectofaircraftroadandrailwaytrafficnoiseonstrokeresultsofacasecontrolstudybasedonsecondarydata