Cargando…

Impacts of Low Frequency Noise Exposure on Well-Being: A Case-Study From Portugal

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article is to assess the impacts of low frequency noise, emitted by high-voltage lines and power poles, on the perception of discomfort, comparing two different groups of inhabitants (exposed and unexposed groups) in two areas in the Northwest of Portugal. It proposes a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alves, Juliana A., Silva, Ligia T., Remoaldo, Paula C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136673
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_64_17
_version_ 1783352619136188416
author Alves, Juliana A.
Silva, Ligia T.
Remoaldo, Paula C.
author_facet Alves, Juliana A.
Silva, Ligia T.
Remoaldo, Paula C.
author_sort Alves, Juliana A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article is to assess the impacts of low frequency noise, emitted by high-voltage lines and power poles, on the perception of discomfort, comparing two different groups of inhabitants (exposed and unexposed groups) in two areas in the Northwest of Portugal. It proposes a new oriented methodology to assess discomfort due to the low frequency noise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two predominantly urban areas were used to test the methodology: an “exposed” area with a high presence of the source under study and an “unexposed” area without records of power transmission lines. The research developed included measuring sound levels (in frequency bands from 10 to 160 Hz) with the help of a sound level meter in the two selected urban areas. RESULTS: The real sound coming from the source was recorded and reproduced in an audiometric testing booth to determine the hearing threshold and discomfort of the volunteers. Using the criteria curve developed by DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs/University of Salford) in 2011, the results reveal that the sound levels recorded for the “exposed” group were higher than that for the “unexposed” group. The first recording showed an average of 68.9 dB and the second 64.6 dB, resulting in a significant difference of 4.3 dB between the two groups. After an attempt to isolate the source, the difference was 5.6 dB. Regarding the adapted audiometric tests, the real sound was used, which was collected 5 m between the receiver and the source. CONCLUSION: These results provide support that at this distance the noise was considered annoying.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61222642018-09-12 Impacts of Low Frequency Noise Exposure on Well-Being: A Case-Study From Portugal Alves, Juliana A. Silva, Ligia T. Remoaldo, Paula C. Noise Health Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article is to assess the impacts of low frequency noise, emitted by high-voltage lines and power poles, on the perception of discomfort, comparing two different groups of inhabitants (exposed and unexposed groups) in two areas in the Northwest of Portugal. It proposes a new oriented methodology to assess discomfort due to the low frequency noise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two predominantly urban areas were used to test the methodology: an “exposed” area with a high presence of the source under study and an “unexposed” area without records of power transmission lines. The research developed included measuring sound levels (in frequency bands from 10 to 160 Hz) with the help of a sound level meter in the two selected urban areas. RESULTS: The real sound coming from the source was recorded and reproduced in an audiometric testing booth to determine the hearing threshold and discomfort of the volunteers. Using the criteria curve developed by DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs/University of Salford) in 2011, the results reveal that the sound levels recorded for the “exposed” group were higher than that for the “unexposed” group. The first recording showed an average of 68.9 dB and the second 64.6 dB, resulting in a significant difference of 4.3 dB between the two groups. After an attempt to isolate the source, the difference was 5.6 dB. Regarding the adapted audiometric tests, the real sound was used, which was collected 5 m between the receiver and the source. CONCLUSION: These results provide support that at this distance the noise was considered annoying. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6122264/ /pubmed/30136673 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_64_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alves, Juliana A.
Silva, Ligia T.
Remoaldo, Paula C.
Impacts of Low Frequency Noise Exposure on Well-Being: A Case-Study From Portugal
title Impacts of Low Frequency Noise Exposure on Well-Being: A Case-Study From Portugal
title_full Impacts of Low Frequency Noise Exposure on Well-Being: A Case-Study From Portugal
title_fullStr Impacts of Low Frequency Noise Exposure on Well-Being: A Case-Study From Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of Low Frequency Noise Exposure on Well-Being: A Case-Study From Portugal
title_short Impacts of Low Frequency Noise Exposure on Well-Being: A Case-Study From Portugal
title_sort impacts of low frequency noise exposure on well-being: a case-study from portugal
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136673
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_64_17
work_keys_str_mv AT alvesjulianaa impactsoflowfrequencynoiseexposureonwellbeingacasestudyfromportugal
AT silvaligiat impactsoflowfrequencynoiseexposureonwellbeingacasestudyfromportugal
AT remoaldopaulac impactsoflowfrequencynoiseexposureonwellbeingacasestudyfromportugal