Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for IgA nephropathy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) remains debatable. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were analyzed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Jian-Nan, Bi, Tong-Dan, Zhu, Lin-Bo, Liu, Lin-Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6418
_version_ 1783352629294792704
author Zheng, Jian-Nan
Bi, Tong-Dan
Zhu, Lin-Bo
Liu, Lin-Lin
author_facet Zheng, Jian-Nan
Bi, Tong-Dan
Zhu, Lin-Bo
Liu, Lin-Lin
author_sort Zheng, Jian-Nan
collection PubMed
description The efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) remains debatable. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were analyzed to identify eligible trials. The pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for all the dichotomous outcome measures. A total of eight RCTs with nine publications (n=510 patients) were included. No significant difference was noted between therapeutic regimens with and without MMF for renal remission and end stage renal disease (ESRD) of patients with IgAN (seven trials; RR, 1.250; 95% CI, 0.993–1.574; P=0.057; and four trials; RR, 0.728; 95% CI, 0.164–3.236; P=0.676). To further define the effects of MMF for renal remission, subgroup analysis was performed, demonstrating that MMF was significantly more effective compared with the placebo (three trials; RR, 2.152; 95% CI, 1.198–3.867; P=0.010), although the immunosuppressive regimens with MMF had no significantly different effects compared with those without MMF (four trials; RR, 1.140; 95% CI, 0.955–1.361; P=0.146), indicating that MMF was superior to placebo and had a similar efficacy to other immunosuppressants for renal remission. In addition, subgroup analysis for ESRD revealed no significant differences between MMF and placebo and between the immunosuppressive regimens with and without MMF (three trials; RR, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.160–5.726; P=0.962; and one trial; RR, 0.205; 95% CI, 0.010–4.200; P=0.303). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the therapeutic regimens with and without MMF in terms of the risk of adverse events. The present meta-analysis demonstrated that MMF was more effective compared with the placebo, may have similar efficacy to other immunosuppressants in terms of inducing renal remission of IgAN and may not increase the risk of adverse events. The long-term effects of MMF on the prognosis of patients with IgAN require verification in further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61223112018-09-05 Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for IgA nephropathy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Zheng, Jian-Nan Bi, Tong-Dan Zhu, Lin-Bo Liu, Lin-Lin Exp Ther Med Articles The efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) remains debatable. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were analyzed to identify eligible trials. The pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for all the dichotomous outcome measures. A total of eight RCTs with nine publications (n=510 patients) were included. No significant difference was noted between therapeutic regimens with and without MMF for renal remission and end stage renal disease (ESRD) of patients with IgAN (seven trials; RR, 1.250; 95% CI, 0.993–1.574; P=0.057; and four trials; RR, 0.728; 95% CI, 0.164–3.236; P=0.676). To further define the effects of MMF for renal remission, subgroup analysis was performed, demonstrating that MMF was significantly more effective compared with the placebo (three trials; RR, 2.152; 95% CI, 1.198–3.867; P=0.010), although the immunosuppressive regimens with MMF had no significantly different effects compared with those without MMF (four trials; RR, 1.140; 95% CI, 0.955–1.361; P=0.146), indicating that MMF was superior to placebo and had a similar efficacy to other immunosuppressants for renal remission. In addition, subgroup analysis for ESRD revealed no significant differences between MMF and placebo and between the immunosuppressive regimens with and without MMF (three trials; RR, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.160–5.726; P=0.962; and one trial; RR, 0.205; 95% CI, 0.010–4.200; P=0.303). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the therapeutic regimens with and without MMF in terms of the risk of adverse events. The present meta-analysis demonstrated that MMF was more effective compared with the placebo, may have similar efficacy to other immunosuppressants in terms of inducing renal remission of IgAN and may not increase the risk of adverse events. The long-term effects of MMF on the prognosis of patients with IgAN require verification in further studies. D.A. Spandidos 2018-09 2018-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6122311/ /pubmed/30186414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6418 Text en Copyright: © Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Zheng, Jian-Nan
Bi, Tong-Dan
Zhu, Lin-Bo
Liu, Lin-Lin
Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for IgA nephropathy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for IgA nephropathy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for IgA nephropathy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for IgA nephropathy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for IgA nephropathy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for IgA nephropathy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for iga nephropathy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6418
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengjiannan efficacyandsafetyofmycophenolatemofetilforiganephropathyanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bitongdan efficacyandsafetyofmycophenolatemofetilforiganephropathyanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhulinbo efficacyandsafetyofmycophenolatemofetilforiganephropathyanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liulinlin efficacyandsafetyofmycophenolatemofetilforiganephropathyanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials