Cargando…

Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000–2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data

BACKGROUND: The outcomes for planned homebirth in Victoria are unknown. We aimed to compare the rates of outcomes for high risk and low risk women who planned to birth at home compared to those who planned to birth in hospital. METHODS: We undertook a population based cohort study of all births in V...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies-Tuck, Miranda L., Wallace, Euan M., Davey, Mary-Ann, Veitch, Vickie, Oats, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1996-6
_version_ 1783352674031239168
author Davies-Tuck, Miranda L.
Wallace, Euan M.
Davey, Mary-Ann
Veitch, Vickie
Oats, Jeremy
author_facet Davies-Tuck, Miranda L.
Wallace, Euan M.
Davey, Mary-Ann
Veitch, Vickie
Oats, Jeremy
author_sort Davies-Tuck, Miranda L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The outcomes for planned homebirth in Victoria are unknown. We aimed to compare the rates of outcomes for high risk and low risk women who planned to birth at home compared to those who planned to birth in hospital. METHODS: We undertook a population based cohort study of all births in Victoria, Australia 2000–2015. Women were defined as being of low or high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes according to the eligibility criteria for homebirth and either planning to birth at home or in a hospital setting at the at the onset of labour. Rates of perinatal and maternal mortality and morbidity as well as obstetric interventions were compared. RESULTS: Three thousand nine hundred forty-five women planned to give birth at home with a privately practising midwife and 829,286 women planned to give birth in a hospital setting. Regardless of risk status, planned homebirth was associated with significantly lower rates of all obstetric interventions and higher rates of spontaneous vaginal birth (p ≤ 0.0001 for all). For low risk women the rates of perinatal mortality were similar (1.6 per 1000 v’s 1.7 per 1000; p = 0.90) and overall composite perinatal (3.6% v’s 13.4%; p ≤ 0.001) and maternal morbidities (10.7% v’s 17.3%; p ≤ 0.001) were significantly lower for those planning a homebirth. Planned homebirth among high risk women was associated with significantly higher rates of perinatal mortality (9.3 per 1000 v’s 3.5 per 1000; p = 0.009) but an overall significant decrease in composite perinatal (7.8% v’s 16.9%; p ≤ 0.001) and maternal morbidities (16.7% v’s 24.6%; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Regardless of risk status, planned homebirth was associated with significantly lower rates of obstetric interventions and combined overall maternal and perinatal morbidities. For low risk women, planned homebirth was also associated with similar risks of perinatal mortality, however for women with recognized risk factors, planned homebirth was associated with significantly higher rates of perinatal mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61225332018-09-05 Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000–2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data Davies-Tuck, Miranda L. Wallace, Euan M. Davey, Mary-Ann Veitch, Vickie Oats, Jeremy BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The outcomes for planned homebirth in Victoria are unknown. We aimed to compare the rates of outcomes for high risk and low risk women who planned to birth at home compared to those who planned to birth in hospital. METHODS: We undertook a population based cohort study of all births in Victoria, Australia 2000–2015. Women were defined as being of low or high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes according to the eligibility criteria for homebirth and either planning to birth at home or in a hospital setting at the at the onset of labour. Rates of perinatal and maternal mortality and morbidity as well as obstetric interventions were compared. RESULTS: Three thousand nine hundred forty-five women planned to give birth at home with a privately practising midwife and 829,286 women planned to give birth in a hospital setting. Regardless of risk status, planned homebirth was associated with significantly lower rates of all obstetric interventions and higher rates of spontaneous vaginal birth (p ≤ 0.0001 for all). For low risk women the rates of perinatal mortality were similar (1.6 per 1000 v’s 1.7 per 1000; p = 0.90) and overall composite perinatal (3.6% v’s 13.4%; p ≤ 0.001) and maternal morbidities (10.7% v’s 17.3%; p ≤ 0.001) were significantly lower for those planning a homebirth. Planned homebirth among high risk women was associated with significantly higher rates of perinatal mortality (9.3 per 1000 v’s 3.5 per 1000; p = 0.009) but an overall significant decrease in composite perinatal (7.8% v’s 16.9%; p ≤ 0.001) and maternal morbidities (16.7% v’s 24.6%; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Regardless of risk status, planned homebirth was associated with significantly lower rates of obstetric interventions and combined overall maternal and perinatal morbidities. For low risk women, planned homebirth was also associated with similar risks of perinatal mortality, however for women with recognized risk factors, planned homebirth was associated with significantly higher rates of perinatal mortality. BioMed Central 2018-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6122533/ /pubmed/30176816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1996-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Davies-Tuck, Miranda L.
Wallace, Euan M.
Davey, Mary-Ann
Veitch, Vickie
Oats, Jeremy
Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000–2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data
title Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000–2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data
title_full Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000–2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data
title_fullStr Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000–2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data
title_full_unstemmed Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000–2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data
title_short Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000–2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data
title_sort planned private homebirth in victoria 2000–2015: a retrospective cohort study of victorian perinatal data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1996-6
work_keys_str_mv AT daviestuckmirandal plannedprivatehomebirthinvictoria20002015aretrospectivecohortstudyofvictorianperinataldata
AT wallaceeuanm plannedprivatehomebirthinvictoria20002015aretrospectivecohortstudyofvictorianperinataldata
AT daveymaryann plannedprivatehomebirthinvictoria20002015aretrospectivecohortstudyofvictorianperinataldata
AT veitchvickie plannedprivatehomebirthinvictoria20002015aretrospectivecohortstudyofvictorianperinataldata
AT oatsjeremy plannedprivatehomebirthinvictoria20002015aretrospectivecohortstudyofvictorianperinataldata