Cargando…

Re-visiting the ATA 2015 sonographic guidelines - who are we missing?: A retrospective review

BACKGROUND: The American Thyroid Association published revised guidelines in 2015 on the management of differentiated thyroid cancer in adults. One of the key changes introduced in the revision proposes that diagnostic biopsy be based on ultrasound findings (i.e. size and nodule characteristics). Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, D. S., Gong, K., Roskies, M. G., Forest, V. I., Hier, M. P., Payne, R. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0296-5
_version_ 1783352698395951104
author Chan, D. S.
Gong, K.
Roskies, M. G.
Forest, V. I.
Hier, M. P.
Payne, R. J.
author_facet Chan, D. S.
Gong, K.
Roskies, M. G.
Forest, V. I.
Hier, M. P.
Payne, R. J.
author_sort Chan, D. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American Thyroid Association published revised guidelines in 2015 on the management of differentiated thyroid cancer in adults. One of the key changes introduced in the revision proposes that diagnostic biopsy be based on ultrasound findings (i.e. size and nodule characteristics). The overall effect of these changes results in fewer nodules requiring biopsy. This study was conducted to determine if the changes to the guidelines will result in overlooked thyroid cancers, specifically malignancies with aggressive characteristics measuring between 1 and 1.49 cm. METHODS: Patients (n = 2083) with thyroid nodules who underwent total or subtotal/hemi thyroidectomy with or without neck dissection by a single surgeon between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively enrolled. Demographic information and nodule characteristics were collected for all patients. Ultrasonography and final pathology reports were reviewed for patients with thyroid nodules between the sizes of 1–1.49 cm (n = 155). RESULTS: 45% (n = 70) of patients with nodules between 1 and 1.49 cm were “low suspicion” nodules according to ultrasound. 47 of these nodules contained malignancies on final histopathological examination, 100% of which were of the papillary subtype. 21% (n = 10) of these malignant nodules demonstrated extrathyroidal extension and 34% (n = 16) were associated with regional metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on sonographic patterns alone could result in missed cancer diagnoses in patients with thyroid nodules measuring between 1 and 1.49 cm. Moreover, a portion of these malignancies may be associated with aggressive features. The effect of this finding on long-term outcomes is unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61226652018-09-10 Re-visiting the ATA 2015 sonographic guidelines - who are we missing?: A retrospective review Chan, D. S. Gong, K. Roskies, M. G. Forest, V. I. Hier, M. P. Payne, R. J. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The American Thyroid Association published revised guidelines in 2015 on the management of differentiated thyroid cancer in adults. One of the key changes introduced in the revision proposes that diagnostic biopsy be based on ultrasound findings (i.e. size and nodule characteristics). The overall effect of these changes results in fewer nodules requiring biopsy. This study was conducted to determine if the changes to the guidelines will result in overlooked thyroid cancers, specifically malignancies with aggressive characteristics measuring between 1 and 1.49 cm. METHODS: Patients (n = 2083) with thyroid nodules who underwent total or subtotal/hemi thyroidectomy with or without neck dissection by a single surgeon between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively enrolled. Demographic information and nodule characteristics were collected for all patients. Ultrasonography and final pathology reports were reviewed for patients with thyroid nodules between the sizes of 1–1.49 cm (n = 155). RESULTS: 45% (n = 70) of patients with nodules between 1 and 1.49 cm were “low suspicion” nodules according to ultrasound. 47 of these nodules contained malignancies on final histopathological examination, 100% of which were of the papillary subtype. 21% (n = 10) of these malignant nodules demonstrated extrathyroidal extension and 34% (n = 16) were associated with regional metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on sonographic patterns alone could result in missed cancer diagnoses in patients with thyroid nodules measuring between 1 and 1.49 cm. Moreover, a portion of these malignancies may be associated with aggressive features. The effect of this finding on long-term outcomes is unclear. BioMed Central 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6122665/ /pubmed/30176940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0296-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Chan, D. S.
Gong, K.
Roskies, M. G.
Forest, V. I.
Hier, M. P.
Payne, R. J.
Re-visiting the ATA 2015 sonographic guidelines - who are we missing?: A retrospective review
title Re-visiting the ATA 2015 sonographic guidelines - who are we missing?: A retrospective review
title_full Re-visiting the ATA 2015 sonographic guidelines - who are we missing?: A retrospective review
title_fullStr Re-visiting the ATA 2015 sonographic guidelines - who are we missing?: A retrospective review
title_full_unstemmed Re-visiting the ATA 2015 sonographic guidelines - who are we missing?: A retrospective review
title_short Re-visiting the ATA 2015 sonographic guidelines - who are we missing?: A retrospective review
title_sort re-visiting the ata 2015 sonographic guidelines - who are we missing?: a retrospective review
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0296-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chands revisitingtheata2015sonographicguidelineswhoarewemissingaretrospectivereview
AT gongk revisitingtheata2015sonographicguidelineswhoarewemissingaretrospectivereview
AT roskiesmg revisitingtheata2015sonographicguidelineswhoarewemissingaretrospectivereview
AT forestvi revisitingtheata2015sonographicguidelineswhoarewemissingaretrospectivereview
AT hiermp revisitingtheata2015sonographicguidelineswhoarewemissingaretrospectivereview
AT paynerj revisitingtheata2015sonographicguidelineswhoarewemissingaretrospectivereview