Cargando…
The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review
BACKGROUND: Observational studies have reported conflicting results on the impact of mammography service screening programmes on the advanced breast cancer rate (ABCR), a correlation that was firmly established in randomized controlled trials. We reviewed and summarized studies of the effect of serv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4666-1 |
_version_ | 1783352712318943232 |
---|---|
author | Broeders, M. J. M. Allgood, P. Duffy, S. W. Hofvind, S. Nagtegaal, I. D. Paci, E. Moss, S. M. Bucchi, L. |
author_facet | Broeders, M. J. M. Allgood, P. Duffy, S. W. Hofvind, S. Nagtegaal, I. D. Paci, E. Moss, S. M. Bucchi, L. |
author_sort | Broeders, M. J. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Observational studies have reported conflicting results on the impact of mammography service screening programmes on the advanced breast cancer rate (ABCR), a correlation that was firmly established in randomized controlled trials. We reviewed and summarized studies of the effect of service screening programmes in the European Union on ABCR and discussed their limitations. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for English language studies published between 01-01-2000 and 01–06-2018. After inspection of titles and abstracts, 220 of the 8644 potentially eligible papers were considered relevant. Their abstracts were reviewed by groups of two authors using predefined criteria. Fifty studies were selected for full paper review, and 22 of these were eligible. A theoretical framework for their review was developed. Review was performed using a ten-point checklist of the methodological caveats in the analysis of studies of ABCR and a standardised assessment form designed to extract quantitative and qualitative information. RESULTS: Most of the evaluable studies support a reduction in ABCR following the introduction of screening. However, all studies were challenged by issues of design and analysis which could at least potentially cause bias, and showed considerable variation in the estimated effect. Problems were observed in duration of follow-up time, availability of reliable reference ABCR, definition of advanced stage, temporal variation in the proportion of unknown-stage cancers, and statistical approach. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that much of the current controversy on the impact of service screening programmes on ABCR is due to observational data that were gathered and/or analysed with methodological approaches which could not capture stage effects in full. Future research on this important early indicator of screening effectiveness should focus on establishing consensus in the correct methodology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4666-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6122725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61227252018-09-10 The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review Broeders, M. J. M. Allgood, P. Duffy, S. W. Hofvind, S. Nagtegaal, I. D. Paci, E. Moss, S. M. Bucchi, L. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Observational studies have reported conflicting results on the impact of mammography service screening programmes on the advanced breast cancer rate (ABCR), a correlation that was firmly established in randomized controlled trials. We reviewed and summarized studies of the effect of service screening programmes in the European Union on ABCR and discussed their limitations. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for English language studies published between 01-01-2000 and 01–06-2018. After inspection of titles and abstracts, 220 of the 8644 potentially eligible papers were considered relevant. Their abstracts were reviewed by groups of two authors using predefined criteria. Fifty studies were selected for full paper review, and 22 of these were eligible. A theoretical framework for their review was developed. Review was performed using a ten-point checklist of the methodological caveats in the analysis of studies of ABCR and a standardised assessment form designed to extract quantitative and qualitative information. RESULTS: Most of the evaluable studies support a reduction in ABCR following the introduction of screening. However, all studies were challenged by issues of design and analysis which could at least potentially cause bias, and showed considerable variation in the estimated effect. Problems were observed in duration of follow-up time, availability of reliable reference ABCR, definition of advanced stage, temporal variation in the proportion of unknown-stage cancers, and statistical approach. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that much of the current controversy on the impact of service screening programmes on ABCR is due to observational data that were gathered and/or analysed with methodological approaches which could not capture stage effects in full. Future research on this important early indicator of screening effectiveness should focus on establishing consensus in the correct methodology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4666-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6122725/ /pubmed/30176813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4666-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Broeders, M. J. M. Allgood, P. Duffy, S. W. Hofvind, S. Nagtegaal, I. D. Paci, E. Moss, S. M. Bucchi, L. The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review |
title | The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review |
title_full | The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review |
title_fullStr | The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review |
title_short | The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review |
title_sort | impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in europe: a literature review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4666-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broedersmjm theimpactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT allgoodp theimpactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT duffysw theimpactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT hofvinds theimpactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT nagtegaalid theimpactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT pacie theimpactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT mosssm theimpactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT bucchil theimpactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT broedersmjm impactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT allgoodp impactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT duffysw impactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT hofvinds impactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT nagtegaalid impactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT pacie impactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT mosssm impactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview AT bucchil impactofmammographyscreeningprogrammesonincidenceofadvancedbreastcancerineuropealiteraturereview |