Cargando…

Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together?

BACKGROUND: In some in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, we may consider transferring one poor-quality embryo with one good-quality embryo. Previous studies have indicated that the poor-quality embryo transferred with a good-quality embryo does not negative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jiaheng, Du, Mingze, Zhang, Zhan, Guan, Yichun, Wang, Xingling, Zhang, Xiao, Liu, Jing, Pan, Zhouhui, Wang, Bijun, Liu, Wenxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30180866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0452-6
_version_ 1783352717746372608
author Li, Jiaheng
Du, Mingze
Zhang, Zhan
Guan, Yichun
Wang, Xingling
Zhang, Xiao
Liu, Jing
Pan, Zhouhui
Wang, Bijun
Liu, Wenxia
author_facet Li, Jiaheng
Du, Mingze
Zhang, Zhan
Guan, Yichun
Wang, Xingling
Zhang, Xiao
Liu, Jing
Pan, Zhouhui
Wang, Bijun
Liu, Wenxia
author_sort Li, Jiaheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In some in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, we may consider transferring one poor-quality embryo with one good-quality embryo. Previous studies have indicated that the poor-quality embryo transferred with a good-quality embryo does not negatively affect the clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes in this context. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 1646 cycles from our centre. Patients were divided into two groups (group A: one good-quality embryo was transferred with one poor-quality embryo; group B: two good-quality embryos were transferred). The primary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Additionally, we investigated the implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, abortion rate, multiple pregnancy rate, birthweight and gestational age. RESULTS: We found that there were no differences in the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate between group A and group B. However, the implantation rate and multiple pregnancy rate were higher in group B than in group A. CONCLUSIONS: The poor-quality embryo does not have a significant influence on the good-quality embryo when transferred together.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61227482018-09-10 Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together? Li, Jiaheng Du, Mingze Zhang, Zhan Guan, Yichun Wang, Xingling Zhang, Xiao Liu, Jing Pan, Zhouhui Wang, Bijun Liu, Wenxia J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: In some in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, we may consider transferring one poor-quality embryo with one good-quality embryo. Previous studies have indicated that the poor-quality embryo transferred with a good-quality embryo does not negatively affect the clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes in this context. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 1646 cycles from our centre. Patients were divided into two groups (group A: one good-quality embryo was transferred with one poor-quality embryo; group B: two good-quality embryos were transferred). The primary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Additionally, we investigated the implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, abortion rate, multiple pregnancy rate, birthweight and gestational age. RESULTS: We found that there were no differences in the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate between group A and group B. However, the implantation rate and multiple pregnancy rate were higher in group B than in group A. CONCLUSIONS: The poor-quality embryo does not have a significant influence on the good-quality embryo when transferred together. BioMed Central 2018-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6122748/ /pubmed/30180866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0452-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Jiaheng
Du, Mingze
Zhang, Zhan
Guan, Yichun
Wang, Xingling
Zhang, Xiao
Liu, Jing
Pan, Zhouhui
Wang, Bijun
Liu, Wenxia
Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together?
title Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together?
title_full Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together?
title_fullStr Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together?
title_full_unstemmed Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together?
title_short Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together?
title_sort does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30180866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0452-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lijiaheng doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether
AT dumingze doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether
AT zhangzhan doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether
AT guanyichun doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether
AT wangxingling doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether
AT zhangxiao doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether
AT liujing doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether
AT panzhouhui doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether
AT wangbijun doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether
AT liuwenxia doesapoorqualityembryohaveanadverseimpactonagoodqualityembryowhentransferredtogether