Cargando…

Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies

BACKGROUND: Multiplex assays are increasingly applied to analyze multicomponent signatures of human immune responses, including the dynamics of cytokine and chemokine production, in observational as well as interventional studies following treatment or vaccination. However, relatively limited inform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Meijgaarden, Krista E., Khatri, Bhagwati, Smith, Steven G., Drittij, Anne M. F. H., de Paus, Roelof A., Goeman, Jelle J., Ho, Mei M., Dockrell, Hazel M., McShane, Helen, Joosten, Simone A., Ottenhoff, Tom H. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30180167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201205
_version_ 1783352727306240000
author van Meijgaarden, Krista E.
Khatri, Bhagwati
Smith, Steven G.
Drittij, Anne M. F. H.
de Paus, Roelof A.
Goeman, Jelle J.
Ho, Mei M.
Dockrell, Hazel M.
McShane, Helen
Joosten, Simone A.
Ottenhoff, Tom H. M.
author_facet van Meijgaarden, Krista E.
Khatri, Bhagwati
Smith, Steven G.
Drittij, Anne M. F. H.
de Paus, Roelof A.
Goeman, Jelle J.
Ho, Mei M.
Dockrell, Hazel M.
McShane, Helen
Joosten, Simone A.
Ottenhoff, Tom H. M.
author_sort van Meijgaarden, Krista E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiplex assays are increasingly applied to analyze multicomponent signatures of human immune responses, including the dynamics of cytokine and chemokine production, in observational as well as interventional studies following treatment or vaccination. However, relatively limited information is available on the performance of the different available multiplex kits, and comparative evaluations addressing this important issue are lacking. STUDY DESIGN: To fill this knowledge gap we performed a technical comparison of multiplex bead assays from 4 manufacturers, each represented by 3 different lots, and with the assays performed by 3 different laboratories. To cross compare kits directly, spiked samples, biological samples and a newly made reference standard were included in all assays. Analyses were performed on 324 standard curves to allow for evaluation of the quality of the standard curves and the subsequent interpretation of biological specimens. RESULTS: Manufacturer was the factor which contributed most to the observed variation whereas variation in lots, laboratory or type of detection reagent contributed minimally. Inclusion of a common reference standard allowed us to overcome observed differences in cytokine and chemokine levels between manufacturers. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly recommend using multiplex assays from the same manufacturer within a single study and across studies that are likely to compare results in a quantitative manner. Incorporation of common reference standards, and application of the same analysis method in assays can overcome many analytical biases and thus could bridge comparison of independent immune profiling (e.g. vaccine immunogenicity) studies. With these recommendations taken into account, the multiplex bead assays performed as described here are useful tools in capturing complex human immune-signatures in observational and interventional studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6122788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61227882018-09-16 Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies van Meijgaarden, Krista E. Khatri, Bhagwati Smith, Steven G. Drittij, Anne M. F. H. de Paus, Roelof A. Goeman, Jelle J. Ho, Mei M. Dockrell, Hazel M. McShane, Helen Joosten, Simone A. Ottenhoff, Tom H. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiplex assays are increasingly applied to analyze multicomponent signatures of human immune responses, including the dynamics of cytokine and chemokine production, in observational as well as interventional studies following treatment or vaccination. However, relatively limited information is available on the performance of the different available multiplex kits, and comparative evaluations addressing this important issue are lacking. STUDY DESIGN: To fill this knowledge gap we performed a technical comparison of multiplex bead assays from 4 manufacturers, each represented by 3 different lots, and with the assays performed by 3 different laboratories. To cross compare kits directly, spiked samples, biological samples and a newly made reference standard were included in all assays. Analyses were performed on 324 standard curves to allow for evaluation of the quality of the standard curves and the subsequent interpretation of biological specimens. RESULTS: Manufacturer was the factor which contributed most to the observed variation whereas variation in lots, laboratory or type of detection reagent contributed minimally. Inclusion of a common reference standard allowed us to overcome observed differences in cytokine and chemokine levels between manufacturers. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly recommend using multiplex assays from the same manufacturer within a single study and across studies that are likely to compare results in a quantitative manner. Incorporation of common reference standards, and application of the same analysis method in assays can overcome many analytical biases and thus could bridge comparison of independent immune profiling (e.g. vaccine immunogenicity) studies. With these recommendations taken into account, the multiplex bead assays performed as described here are useful tools in capturing complex human immune-signatures in observational and interventional studies. Public Library of Science 2018-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6122788/ /pubmed/30180167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201205 Text en © 2018 van Meijgaarden et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Meijgaarden, Krista E.
Khatri, Bhagwati
Smith, Steven G.
Drittij, Anne M. F. H.
de Paus, Roelof A.
Goeman, Jelle J.
Ho, Mei M.
Dockrell, Hazel M.
McShane, Helen
Joosten, Simone A.
Ottenhoff, Tom H. M.
Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies
title Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies
title_full Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies
title_fullStr Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies
title_full_unstemmed Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies
title_short Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies
title_sort cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30180167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201205
work_keys_str_mv AT vanmeijgaardenkristae crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT khatribhagwati crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT smithsteveng crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT drittijannemfh crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT depausroelofa crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT goemanjellej crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT homeim crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT dockrellhazelm crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT mcshanehelen crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT joostensimonea crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies
AT ottenhofftomhm crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies