Cargando…
Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies
BACKGROUND: Multiplex assays are increasingly applied to analyze multicomponent signatures of human immune responses, including the dynamics of cytokine and chemokine production, in observational as well as interventional studies following treatment or vaccination. However, relatively limited inform...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30180167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201205 |
_version_ | 1783352727306240000 |
---|---|
author | van Meijgaarden, Krista E. Khatri, Bhagwati Smith, Steven G. Drittij, Anne M. F. H. de Paus, Roelof A. Goeman, Jelle J. Ho, Mei M. Dockrell, Hazel M. McShane, Helen Joosten, Simone A. Ottenhoff, Tom H. M. |
author_facet | van Meijgaarden, Krista E. Khatri, Bhagwati Smith, Steven G. Drittij, Anne M. F. H. de Paus, Roelof A. Goeman, Jelle J. Ho, Mei M. Dockrell, Hazel M. McShane, Helen Joosten, Simone A. Ottenhoff, Tom H. M. |
author_sort | van Meijgaarden, Krista E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiplex assays are increasingly applied to analyze multicomponent signatures of human immune responses, including the dynamics of cytokine and chemokine production, in observational as well as interventional studies following treatment or vaccination. However, relatively limited information is available on the performance of the different available multiplex kits, and comparative evaluations addressing this important issue are lacking. STUDY DESIGN: To fill this knowledge gap we performed a technical comparison of multiplex bead assays from 4 manufacturers, each represented by 3 different lots, and with the assays performed by 3 different laboratories. To cross compare kits directly, spiked samples, biological samples and a newly made reference standard were included in all assays. Analyses were performed on 324 standard curves to allow for evaluation of the quality of the standard curves and the subsequent interpretation of biological specimens. RESULTS: Manufacturer was the factor which contributed most to the observed variation whereas variation in lots, laboratory or type of detection reagent contributed minimally. Inclusion of a common reference standard allowed us to overcome observed differences in cytokine and chemokine levels between manufacturers. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly recommend using multiplex assays from the same manufacturer within a single study and across studies that are likely to compare results in a quantitative manner. Incorporation of common reference standards, and application of the same analysis method in assays can overcome many analytical biases and thus could bridge comparison of independent immune profiling (e.g. vaccine immunogenicity) studies. With these recommendations taken into account, the multiplex bead assays performed as described here are useful tools in capturing complex human immune-signatures in observational and interventional studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6122788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61227882018-09-16 Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies van Meijgaarden, Krista E. Khatri, Bhagwati Smith, Steven G. Drittij, Anne M. F. H. de Paus, Roelof A. Goeman, Jelle J. Ho, Mei M. Dockrell, Hazel M. McShane, Helen Joosten, Simone A. Ottenhoff, Tom H. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiplex assays are increasingly applied to analyze multicomponent signatures of human immune responses, including the dynamics of cytokine and chemokine production, in observational as well as interventional studies following treatment or vaccination. However, relatively limited information is available on the performance of the different available multiplex kits, and comparative evaluations addressing this important issue are lacking. STUDY DESIGN: To fill this knowledge gap we performed a technical comparison of multiplex bead assays from 4 manufacturers, each represented by 3 different lots, and with the assays performed by 3 different laboratories. To cross compare kits directly, spiked samples, biological samples and a newly made reference standard were included in all assays. Analyses were performed on 324 standard curves to allow for evaluation of the quality of the standard curves and the subsequent interpretation of biological specimens. RESULTS: Manufacturer was the factor which contributed most to the observed variation whereas variation in lots, laboratory or type of detection reagent contributed minimally. Inclusion of a common reference standard allowed us to overcome observed differences in cytokine and chemokine levels between manufacturers. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly recommend using multiplex assays from the same manufacturer within a single study and across studies that are likely to compare results in a quantitative manner. Incorporation of common reference standards, and application of the same analysis method in assays can overcome many analytical biases and thus could bridge comparison of independent immune profiling (e.g. vaccine immunogenicity) studies. With these recommendations taken into account, the multiplex bead assays performed as described here are useful tools in capturing complex human immune-signatures in observational and interventional studies. Public Library of Science 2018-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6122788/ /pubmed/30180167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201205 Text en © 2018 van Meijgaarden et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Meijgaarden, Krista E. Khatri, Bhagwati Smith, Steven G. Drittij, Anne M. F. H. de Paus, Roelof A. Goeman, Jelle J. Ho, Mei M. Dockrell, Hazel M. McShane, Helen Joosten, Simone A. Ottenhoff, Tom H. M. Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies |
title | Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies |
title_full | Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies |
title_fullStr | Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies |
title_short | Cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies |
title_sort | cross-laboratory evaluation of multiplex bead assays including independent common reference standards for immunological monitoring of observational and interventional human studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30180167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanmeijgaardenkristae crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT khatribhagwati crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT smithsteveng crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT drittijannemfh crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT depausroelofa crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT goemanjellej crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT homeim crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT dockrellhazelm crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT mcshanehelen crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT joostensimonea crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies AT ottenhofftomhm crosslaboratoryevaluationofmultiplexbeadassaysincludingindependentcommonreferencestandardsforimmunologicalmonitoringofobservationalandinterventionalhumanstudies |