Cargando…

Micro‐ribonucleic acid‐binding site variants of type 2 diabetes candidate loci predispose to gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese Han women

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence has suggested that the genetic background of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was analogous to type 2 diabetes mellitus. In contrast to type 2 diabetes mellitus, the genetic studies for GDM were limited. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to extensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiaojing, Li, Wei, Ma, Liangkun, Ping, Fan, Liu, Juntao, Wu, Xueyan, Mao, Jiangfeng, Wang, Xi, Nie, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29352517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12803
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence has suggested that the genetic background of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was analogous to type 2 diabetes mellitus. In contrast to type 2 diabetes mellitus, the genetic studies for GDM were limited. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to extensively explore the influence of micro‐ribonucleic acid‐binding single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in type 2 diabetes mellitus candidate loci on GDM susceptibility in Chinese. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 839 GDM patients and 900 controls were enrolled. Six micro‐ribonucleic acid‐binding SNPs were selected from 30 type 2 diabetes mellitus susceptibility loci and genotyped using TaqMan allelic discrimination assays. RESULTS: The minor allele of three SNPs, PAX4 rs712699 (OR 1.366, 95% confidence interval 1.021–1.828, P = 0.036), KCNB1 rs1051295 (OR 1.579, 95% confidence interval 1.172–2.128, P = 0.003) and MFN2 rs1042842 (OR 1.398, 95% confidence interval 1.050–1.862, P = 0.022) were identified to significantly confer higher a risk of GDM in the additive model. The association between rs1051295 and increased fasting plasma glucose (b = 0.006, P = 0.008), 3‐h oral glucose tolerance test plasma glucose (b = 0.058, P = 0.025) and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (b = 0.065, P = 0.017) was also shown. Rs1042842 was correlated with higher 3‐h oral glucose tolerance test plasma glucose (b = 0.056, P = 0.028). However, no significant correlation between the other included SNPs (LPIN1 rs1050800, VPS26A rs1802295 and NLRP3 rs10802502) and GDM susceptibility were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings showed that micro‐ribonucleic acid‐binding SNPs in type 2 diabetes mellitus candidate loci were also associated with GDM susceptibility, which further highlighted the similar genetic basis underlying GDM and type 2 diabetes mellitus.