Cargando…

High‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy pretreatment dwell position verification using a transparent applicator

PURPOSE: The major errors in HDR brachytherapy are related to treatment distance, almost all of which are caused by incorrect applicator information. The aim of this study is to propose a quick pretreatment verification method to evaluate channel length and dwell position with a transparent applicat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otani, Yuki, Sumida, Iori, Nose, Takayuki, Shimamoto, Shigetoshi, Okubo, Hirofumi, Ogawa, Kazuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12405
_version_ 1783352794284032000
author Otani, Yuki
Sumida, Iori
Nose, Takayuki
Shimamoto, Shigetoshi
Okubo, Hirofumi
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
author_facet Otani, Yuki
Sumida, Iori
Nose, Takayuki
Shimamoto, Shigetoshi
Okubo, Hirofumi
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
author_sort Otani, Yuki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The major errors in HDR brachytherapy are related to treatment distance, almost all of which are caused by incorrect applicator information. The aim of this study is to propose a quick pretreatment verification method to evaluate channel length and dwell position with a transparent applicator, which, in addition, is suitable as an education tool to assist in the understanding of the applicator structure. METHODS: A transparent applicator model was fabricated using a three‐dimensional printer and transparent resin. Its aim is to be a replica of a real gynecological applicator. The pretreatment verification is performed by observing the planned dwell positions of a check cable inside a transparent applicator. A digital camera acquired images and the dwell positions of the radioactive source and check cable were evaluated by comparing them with respect to the theoretical dwell positions marked by the proper x‐ray marker. The potential effectiveness of verification using a transparent applicator was also evaluated using brachytherapy events reported in the literature. RESULTS: The transparent applicator closely resembles the real applicator in shape and had an error of less than 0.2 mm. The average dwell position displacement between the radioactive source and check cable was 0.4 mm. The analysis of brachytherapy events showed that channel‐length, dwell‐position, and step‐size errors made up 50% of all events, but affected 64% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The transparent applicator model enables a noninvasive, repeatable verification of the channel length and dwell positions to be performed before treatment. This verification has the potential to help prevent common errors in treatment delivery. In addition, the transparent applicator model can be used as a teaching tool to help clinicians understand the operation of the applicator, lowering the risk of events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6123126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61231262018-09-10 High‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy pretreatment dwell position verification using a transparent applicator Otani, Yuki Sumida, Iori Nose, Takayuki Shimamoto, Shigetoshi Okubo, Hirofumi Ogawa, Kazuhiko J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The major errors in HDR brachytherapy are related to treatment distance, almost all of which are caused by incorrect applicator information. The aim of this study is to propose a quick pretreatment verification method to evaluate channel length and dwell position with a transparent applicator, which, in addition, is suitable as an education tool to assist in the understanding of the applicator structure. METHODS: A transparent applicator model was fabricated using a three‐dimensional printer and transparent resin. Its aim is to be a replica of a real gynecological applicator. The pretreatment verification is performed by observing the planned dwell positions of a check cable inside a transparent applicator. A digital camera acquired images and the dwell positions of the radioactive source and check cable were evaluated by comparing them with respect to the theoretical dwell positions marked by the proper x‐ray marker. The potential effectiveness of verification using a transparent applicator was also evaluated using brachytherapy events reported in the literature. RESULTS: The transparent applicator closely resembles the real applicator in shape and had an error of less than 0.2 mm. The average dwell position displacement between the radioactive source and check cable was 0.4 mm. The analysis of brachytherapy events showed that channel‐length, dwell‐position, and step‐size errors made up 50% of all events, but affected 64% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The transparent applicator model enables a noninvasive, repeatable verification of the channel length and dwell positions to be performed before treatment. This verification has the potential to help prevent common errors in treatment delivery. In addition, the transparent applicator model can be used as a teaching tool to help clinicians understand the operation of the applicator, lowering the risk of events. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6123126/ /pubmed/29959815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12405 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Otani, Yuki
Sumida, Iori
Nose, Takayuki
Shimamoto, Shigetoshi
Okubo, Hirofumi
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
High‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy pretreatment dwell position verification using a transparent applicator
title High‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy pretreatment dwell position verification using a transparent applicator
title_full High‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy pretreatment dwell position verification using a transparent applicator
title_fullStr High‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy pretreatment dwell position verification using a transparent applicator
title_full_unstemmed High‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy pretreatment dwell position verification using a transparent applicator
title_short High‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy pretreatment dwell position verification using a transparent applicator
title_sort high‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy pretreatment dwell position verification using a transparent applicator
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12405
work_keys_str_mv AT otaniyuki highdoserateintracavitarybrachytherapypretreatmentdwellpositionverificationusingatransparentapplicator
AT sumidaiori highdoserateintracavitarybrachytherapypretreatmentdwellpositionverificationusingatransparentapplicator
AT nosetakayuki highdoserateintracavitarybrachytherapypretreatmentdwellpositionverificationusingatransparentapplicator
AT shimamotoshigetoshi highdoserateintracavitarybrachytherapypretreatmentdwellpositionverificationusingatransparentapplicator
AT okubohirofumi highdoserateintracavitarybrachytherapypretreatmentdwellpositionverificationusingatransparentapplicator
AT ogawakazuhiko highdoserateintracavitarybrachytherapypretreatmentdwellpositionverificationusingatransparentapplicator