Cargando…

Production of patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs using a low‐cost, multi‐purpose 3D printer

Electron beam collimators for non‐standard field sizes and shapes are typically fabricated using Styrofoam molds to cast the aperture cut‐out. These molds are often produced using a dedicated foam cutter, which may be expensive and only serves a single purpose. An increasing number of radiotherapy d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michiels, Steven, Mangelschots, Bram, Roover, Robin De, Devroye, Cédric, Depuydt, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30047204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12421
_version_ 1783352794522058752
author Michiels, Steven
Mangelschots, Bram
Roover, Robin De
Devroye, Cédric
Depuydt, Tom
author_facet Michiels, Steven
Mangelschots, Bram
Roover, Robin De
Devroye, Cédric
Depuydt, Tom
author_sort Michiels, Steven
collection PubMed
description Electron beam collimators for non‐standard field sizes and shapes are typically fabricated using Styrofoam molds to cast the aperture cut‐out. These molds are often produced using a dedicated foam cutter, which may be expensive and only serves a single purpose. An increasing number of radiotherapy departments, however, has a 3D printer on‐site, to create a wide range of custom‐made treatment auxiliaries, such as bolus and dosimetry phantoms. The 3D printer can also be used to produce patient‐specific aperture cut‐outs, as elaborated in this note. Open‐source programming language was used to automatically generate the mold's shape in a generic digital file format readable by 3D printer software. The geometric mold model has the patient's identification number integrated and is to be mounted on a uniquely fitting, reusable positioning device, which can be 3D printed as well. This assembly likewise fits uniquely onto the applicator tray, ensuring correct and error‐free alignment of the mold during casting of the aperture. For dosimetric verification, two aperture cut‐outs were cast, one using a conventionally cut Styrofoam mold and one using a 3D printed mold. Using these cut‐outs, the clinical plan was delivered onto a phantom, for which the transversal dose distributions were measured at 2 cm depth using radiochromic film and compared using gamma‐index analysis. An agreement score of 99.9% between the measured 2D dose distributions was found in the (10%–80%) dose region, using 1% (local) dose‐difference and 1.0 mm distance‐to‐agreement acceptance criteria. The workflow using 3D printing has been clinically implemented and is in routine use at the author's institute for all patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs. It allows for a standardized, cost‐effective, and operator‐friendly workflow without the need for dedicated equipment. In addition, it offers possibilities to increase safety and quality of the process including patient identification and methods for accurate mold alignment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6123127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61231272018-09-10 Production of patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs using a low‐cost, multi‐purpose 3D printer Michiels, Steven Mangelschots, Bram Roover, Robin De Devroye, Cédric Depuydt, Tom J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Electron beam collimators for non‐standard field sizes and shapes are typically fabricated using Styrofoam molds to cast the aperture cut‐out. These molds are often produced using a dedicated foam cutter, which may be expensive and only serves a single purpose. An increasing number of radiotherapy departments, however, has a 3D printer on‐site, to create a wide range of custom‐made treatment auxiliaries, such as bolus and dosimetry phantoms. The 3D printer can also be used to produce patient‐specific aperture cut‐outs, as elaborated in this note. Open‐source programming language was used to automatically generate the mold's shape in a generic digital file format readable by 3D printer software. The geometric mold model has the patient's identification number integrated and is to be mounted on a uniquely fitting, reusable positioning device, which can be 3D printed as well. This assembly likewise fits uniquely onto the applicator tray, ensuring correct and error‐free alignment of the mold during casting of the aperture. For dosimetric verification, two aperture cut‐outs were cast, one using a conventionally cut Styrofoam mold and one using a 3D printed mold. Using these cut‐outs, the clinical plan was delivered onto a phantom, for which the transversal dose distributions were measured at 2 cm depth using radiochromic film and compared using gamma‐index analysis. An agreement score of 99.9% between the measured 2D dose distributions was found in the (10%–80%) dose region, using 1% (local) dose‐difference and 1.0 mm distance‐to‐agreement acceptance criteria. The workflow using 3D printing has been clinically implemented and is in routine use at the author's institute for all patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs. It allows for a standardized, cost‐effective, and operator‐friendly workflow without the need for dedicated equipment. In addition, it offers possibilities to increase safety and quality of the process including patient identification and methods for accurate mold alignment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6123127/ /pubmed/30047204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12421 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Michiels, Steven
Mangelschots, Bram
Roover, Robin De
Devroye, Cédric
Depuydt, Tom
Production of patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs using a low‐cost, multi‐purpose 3D printer
title Production of patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs using a low‐cost, multi‐purpose 3D printer
title_full Production of patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs using a low‐cost, multi‐purpose 3D printer
title_fullStr Production of patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs using a low‐cost, multi‐purpose 3D printer
title_full_unstemmed Production of patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs using a low‐cost, multi‐purpose 3D printer
title_short Production of patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs using a low‐cost, multi‐purpose 3D printer
title_sort production of patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs using a low‐cost, multi‐purpose 3d printer
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30047204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12421
work_keys_str_mv AT michielssteven productionofpatientspecificelectronbeamaperturecutoutsusingalowcostmultipurpose3dprinter
AT mangelschotsbram productionofpatientspecificelectronbeamaperturecutoutsusingalowcostmultipurpose3dprinter
AT rooverrobinde productionofpatientspecificelectronbeamaperturecutoutsusingalowcostmultipurpose3dprinter
AT devroyecedric productionofpatientspecificelectronbeamaperturecutoutsusingalowcostmultipurpose3dprinter
AT depuydttom productionofpatientspecificelectronbeamaperturecutoutsusingalowcostmultipurpose3dprinter