Cargando…

Recommendation of fiducial marker implantation for better target tracking using MV imager in prostate radiotherapy

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a model that optimizes the fiducial marker locations in the prostate to increase detectability of the markers in the projected EPID images during VMAT treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The fiducial marker tracking capability for each arc was evaluated t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Tianjun, Kilian‐Meneghin, Joshua, Kumaraswamy, Lalith K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29947073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12390
_version_ 1783352796356018176
author Ma, Tianjun
Kilian‐Meneghin, Joshua
Kumaraswamy, Lalith K.
author_facet Ma, Tianjun
Kilian‐Meneghin, Joshua
Kumaraswamy, Lalith K.
author_sort Ma, Tianjun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a model that optimizes the fiducial marker locations in the prostate to increase detectability of the markers in the projected EPID images during VMAT treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The fiducial marker tracking capability for each arc was evaluated through a proposed formula. The output of the formula, a detectability score, was calculated with the in‐house developed software written in MATLAB (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Three unique weighting factors were added to penalize the detectability score. The detectability scores of four different patterns containing 40 combinations of simulated fiducial marker locations were evaluated with 101 previously treated prostate treatment plans (containing 202 individual arcs). The results were analyzed for each pattern group and each marker separation distance on the transverse plane. RESULTS: The maximum detectability of the markers occurred when they were placed between 10 and 15 mm from the center of the prostate in the transverse plane and 6–13 mm in the superior–inferior direction. The detectability decreased when the markers were placed beyond 20 mm in both directions. CONCLUSIONS: The fiducial marker‐based detectability score can be used to predict the real‐time tracking capability. Suggestions for optimal insertion locations were given to improve prostate motion management using MV imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6123135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61231352018-09-10 Recommendation of fiducial marker implantation for better target tracking using MV imager in prostate radiotherapy Ma, Tianjun Kilian‐Meneghin, Joshua Kumaraswamy, Lalith K. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a model that optimizes the fiducial marker locations in the prostate to increase detectability of the markers in the projected EPID images during VMAT treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The fiducial marker tracking capability for each arc was evaluated through a proposed formula. The output of the formula, a detectability score, was calculated with the in‐house developed software written in MATLAB (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Three unique weighting factors were added to penalize the detectability score. The detectability scores of four different patterns containing 40 combinations of simulated fiducial marker locations were evaluated with 101 previously treated prostate treatment plans (containing 202 individual arcs). The results were analyzed for each pattern group and each marker separation distance on the transverse plane. RESULTS: The maximum detectability of the markers occurred when they were placed between 10 and 15 mm from the center of the prostate in the transverse plane and 6–13 mm in the superior–inferior direction. The detectability decreased when the markers were placed beyond 20 mm in both directions. CONCLUSIONS: The fiducial marker‐based detectability score can be used to predict the real‐time tracking capability. Suggestions for optimal insertion locations were given to improve prostate motion management using MV imaging. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6123135/ /pubmed/29947073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12390 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Ma, Tianjun
Kilian‐Meneghin, Joshua
Kumaraswamy, Lalith K.
Recommendation of fiducial marker implantation for better target tracking using MV imager in prostate radiotherapy
title Recommendation of fiducial marker implantation for better target tracking using MV imager in prostate radiotherapy
title_full Recommendation of fiducial marker implantation for better target tracking using MV imager in prostate radiotherapy
title_fullStr Recommendation of fiducial marker implantation for better target tracking using MV imager in prostate radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Recommendation of fiducial marker implantation for better target tracking using MV imager in prostate radiotherapy
title_short Recommendation of fiducial marker implantation for better target tracking using MV imager in prostate radiotherapy
title_sort recommendation of fiducial marker implantation for better target tracking using mv imager in prostate radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29947073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12390
work_keys_str_mv AT matianjun recommendationoffiducialmarkerimplantationforbettertargettrackingusingmvimagerinprostateradiotherapy
AT kilianmeneghinjoshua recommendationoffiducialmarkerimplantationforbettertargettrackingusingmvimagerinprostateradiotherapy
AT kumaraswamylalithk recommendationoffiducialmarkerimplantationforbettertargettrackingusingmvimagerinprostateradiotherapy