Cargando…

Energy‐dependent OAR sparing and dose conformity for total marrow irradiation of obese patients

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect on target coverage and organs at risk sparing by using 10 versus 6 MV for VMAT total marrow irradiation of obese patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty‐six total marrow irradiation, TMI, treatment plans delivered between December 2014 and June 2017 were reviewed a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cherpak, Amanda J., Monajemi, Thalat, Chytyk‐Praznik, Krista, Mulroy, Liam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12413
_version_ 1783352798265475072
author Cherpak, Amanda J.
Monajemi, Thalat
Chytyk‐Praznik, Krista
Mulroy, Liam
author_facet Cherpak, Amanda J.
Monajemi, Thalat
Chytyk‐Praznik, Krista
Mulroy, Liam
author_sort Cherpak, Amanda J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the effect on target coverage and organs at risk sparing by using 10 versus 6 MV for VMAT total marrow irradiation of obese patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty‐six total marrow irradiation, TMI, treatment plans delivered between December 2014 and June 2017 were reviewed and 10 were chosen for replanning based on patient characteristics and plan metrics. Beam geometry and isocenter placement were conserved, energy was changed from 6 to 10 MV and plans were reoptimized. Resulting dose distributions were compared to original plans to evaluate any potential advantage of choosing one energy over the other. RESULTS: Target coverage and total monitor units were consistent between the 6 and 10 MV plans when averaged over all ten patients. Improvement in the conformity index (−11.0%, P = 0.009) when using 10 MV was statistically significant compared to the 6 MV plans. Volumes of normal tissue receiving 50%, 75%, and 90% Rx all decreased for the 10 MV plans compared to the original 6 MV plans. The mean dose to individual OARs decreased significantly for all investigated structures except for the lenses, oral cavity, and genitalia. The largest decreases in D(mean) were found for the rectum (22.4%, P = 0.004) and bladder (18.1%, P = 0.005). The three highest priorities for sparing during plan optimization (lungs, liver, and heart), showed decreases of 7.6%, 16.1%, and 13.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a higher energy 10 MV beam provided similar dose to target while achieving increased OAR and normal tissue sparing for the patients reviewed in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6123143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61231432018-09-10 Energy‐dependent OAR sparing and dose conformity for total marrow irradiation of obese patients Cherpak, Amanda J. Monajemi, Thalat Chytyk‐Praznik, Krista Mulroy, Liam J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To investigate the effect on target coverage and organs at risk sparing by using 10 versus 6 MV for VMAT total marrow irradiation of obese patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty‐six total marrow irradiation, TMI, treatment plans delivered between December 2014 and June 2017 were reviewed and 10 were chosen for replanning based on patient characteristics and plan metrics. Beam geometry and isocenter placement were conserved, energy was changed from 6 to 10 MV and plans were reoptimized. Resulting dose distributions were compared to original plans to evaluate any potential advantage of choosing one energy over the other. RESULTS: Target coverage and total monitor units were consistent between the 6 and 10 MV plans when averaged over all ten patients. Improvement in the conformity index (−11.0%, P = 0.009) when using 10 MV was statistically significant compared to the 6 MV plans. Volumes of normal tissue receiving 50%, 75%, and 90% Rx all decreased for the 10 MV plans compared to the original 6 MV plans. The mean dose to individual OARs decreased significantly for all investigated structures except for the lenses, oral cavity, and genitalia. The largest decreases in D(mean) were found for the rectum (22.4%, P = 0.004) and bladder (18.1%, P = 0.005). The three highest priorities for sparing during plan optimization (lungs, liver, and heart), showed decreases of 7.6%, 16.1%, and 13.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a higher energy 10 MV beam provided similar dose to target while achieving increased OAR and normal tissue sparing for the patients reviewed in this study. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6123143/ /pubmed/30099836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12413 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Cherpak, Amanda J.
Monajemi, Thalat
Chytyk‐Praznik, Krista
Mulroy, Liam
Energy‐dependent OAR sparing and dose conformity for total marrow irradiation of obese patients
title Energy‐dependent OAR sparing and dose conformity for total marrow irradiation of obese patients
title_full Energy‐dependent OAR sparing and dose conformity for total marrow irradiation of obese patients
title_fullStr Energy‐dependent OAR sparing and dose conformity for total marrow irradiation of obese patients
title_full_unstemmed Energy‐dependent OAR sparing and dose conformity for total marrow irradiation of obese patients
title_short Energy‐dependent OAR sparing and dose conformity for total marrow irradiation of obese patients
title_sort energy‐dependent oar sparing and dose conformity for total marrow irradiation of obese patients
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12413
work_keys_str_mv AT cherpakamandaj energydependentoarsparinganddoseconformityfortotalmarrowirradiationofobesepatients
AT monajemithalat energydependentoarsparinganddoseconformityfortotalmarrowirradiationofobesepatients
AT chytykpraznikkrista energydependentoarsparinganddoseconformityfortotalmarrowirradiationofobesepatients
AT mulroyliam energydependentoarsparinganddoseconformityfortotalmarrowirradiationofobesepatients