Cargando…

Evaluation of the combined use of two different respiratory monitoring systems for 4D CT simulation and gated treatment

PURPOSE: Two different respiratory monitoring systems (Varian's Real‐Time Position Management (RPM) System and Siemens’ ANZAI belt Respiratory Gating System) are compared in the context of respiratory signals and 4D CT images that are accordingly reconstructed. This study aims to evaluate the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jie, Lin, Teh, Fan, Jiajin, Chen, Lili, Price, Robert, Ma, C‐M Charlie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12434
_version_ 1783352801069367296
author Liu, Jie
Lin, Teh
Fan, Jiajin
Chen, Lili
Price, Robert
Ma, C‐M Charlie
author_facet Liu, Jie
Lin, Teh
Fan, Jiajin
Chen, Lili
Price, Robert
Ma, C‐M Charlie
author_sort Liu, Jie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Two different respiratory monitoring systems (Varian's Real‐Time Position Management (RPM) System and Siemens’ ANZAI belt Respiratory Gating System) are compared in the context of respiratory signals and 4D CT images that are accordingly reconstructed. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of combined use of RPM and ANZAI systems for 4DCT simulation and gated radiotherapy treatment, respectively. METHODS: The RPM infrared reflecting marker and the ANZAI belt pressure sensor were both placed on the patient's abdomen during 4DCT scans. The respiratory signal collected by the two systems was synchronized. Fifteen patients were enrolled for respiratory signal collection and analysis. The discrepancies between the RPM and ANZAI traces can be characterized by phase shift and shape distortion. To reveal the impact of the changes in respiratory signals on 4D images, two sets of 4D images based on the same patient's raw data were reconstructed using the RPM and ANZAI data for phase sorting, respectively. The volume of whole lung and the position of diaphragm apex were measured and compared for each respiratory phase. RESULTS: The mean phase shift was measured as 0.2 ± 0.1 s averaged over 15 patients. The shape of the breathing trace was found to be in disagreement. For all the patients, the ANZAI trace had a steeper falloff in exhalation than RPM. The inhalation curve, however, was matched for nine patients, steeper in ANZAI for five patients and steeper in RPM for one patient. For 4D image comparison, the difference in whole‐lung volume was about −4% to +4% and the difference in diaphragm position was about −5 mm to +4 mm, compared in each individual phase and averaged over seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of one system for 4D CT simulation and the other for gated treatment should be avoided as the resultant gating window would not fully match with each other due to the remarkable discrepancy in breathing traces acquired by the two different surrogate systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6123155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61231552018-09-10 Evaluation of the combined use of two different respiratory monitoring systems for 4D CT simulation and gated treatment Liu, Jie Lin, Teh Fan, Jiajin Chen, Lili Price, Robert Ma, C‐M Charlie J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Two different respiratory monitoring systems (Varian's Real‐Time Position Management (RPM) System and Siemens’ ANZAI belt Respiratory Gating System) are compared in the context of respiratory signals and 4D CT images that are accordingly reconstructed. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of combined use of RPM and ANZAI systems for 4DCT simulation and gated radiotherapy treatment, respectively. METHODS: The RPM infrared reflecting marker and the ANZAI belt pressure sensor were both placed on the patient's abdomen during 4DCT scans. The respiratory signal collected by the two systems was synchronized. Fifteen patients were enrolled for respiratory signal collection and analysis. The discrepancies between the RPM and ANZAI traces can be characterized by phase shift and shape distortion. To reveal the impact of the changes in respiratory signals on 4D images, two sets of 4D images based on the same patient's raw data were reconstructed using the RPM and ANZAI data for phase sorting, respectively. The volume of whole lung and the position of diaphragm apex were measured and compared for each respiratory phase. RESULTS: The mean phase shift was measured as 0.2 ± 0.1 s averaged over 15 patients. The shape of the breathing trace was found to be in disagreement. For all the patients, the ANZAI trace had a steeper falloff in exhalation than RPM. The inhalation curve, however, was matched for nine patients, steeper in ANZAI for five patients and steeper in RPM for one patient. For 4D image comparison, the difference in whole‐lung volume was about −4% to +4% and the difference in diaphragm position was about −5 mm to +4 mm, compared in each individual phase and averaged over seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of one system for 4D CT simulation and the other for gated treatment should be avoided as the resultant gating window would not fully match with each other due to the remarkable discrepancy in breathing traces acquired by the two different surrogate systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6123155/ /pubmed/30105770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12434 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Liu, Jie
Lin, Teh
Fan, Jiajin
Chen, Lili
Price, Robert
Ma, C‐M Charlie
Evaluation of the combined use of two different respiratory monitoring systems for 4D CT simulation and gated treatment
title Evaluation of the combined use of two different respiratory monitoring systems for 4D CT simulation and gated treatment
title_full Evaluation of the combined use of two different respiratory monitoring systems for 4D CT simulation and gated treatment
title_fullStr Evaluation of the combined use of two different respiratory monitoring systems for 4D CT simulation and gated treatment
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the combined use of two different respiratory monitoring systems for 4D CT simulation and gated treatment
title_short Evaluation of the combined use of two different respiratory monitoring systems for 4D CT simulation and gated treatment
title_sort evaluation of the combined use of two different respiratory monitoring systems for 4d ct simulation and gated treatment
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12434
work_keys_str_mv AT liujie evaluationofthecombineduseoftwodifferentrespiratorymonitoringsystemsfor4dctsimulationandgatedtreatment
AT linteh evaluationofthecombineduseoftwodifferentrespiratorymonitoringsystemsfor4dctsimulationandgatedtreatment
AT fanjiajin evaluationofthecombineduseoftwodifferentrespiratorymonitoringsystemsfor4dctsimulationandgatedtreatment
AT chenlili evaluationofthecombineduseoftwodifferentrespiratorymonitoringsystemsfor4dctsimulationandgatedtreatment
AT pricerobert evaluationofthecombineduseoftwodifferentrespiratorymonitoringsystemsfor4dctsimulationandgatedtreatment
AT macmcharlie evaluationofthecombineduseoftwodifferentrespiratorymonitoringsystemsfor4dctsimulationandgatedtreatment