Reducing seed waste and increasing value of dynamic intraoperative implantation of Pd‐103 seeds in prostate brachytherapy

Several nomograms exist for ordering palladium‐103 seeds for permanent prostate seed implants (PSI). Excess seeds from PSIs pose additional radiation safety risks and increase the cost of care. This study compared five nomograms to clinical data from dynamic modified‐peripheral intraoperative PSI to determine (a) the cause of excess seeds and (b) the optimal nomogram for our institution. Pre‐ and intraoperative patient data were collected for monotherapy PSIs and compiled into a clinical database. All patients were prescribed 125 Gy with dose coverage of D90% = 100% to the planning target volume (PTV) using (103)Pd seeds with mean air‐kerma strength ([Formula: see text]) of 2 U. Seeds were ordered based upon an in‐house nomogram as a function of preoperative prostate volume and prescription dose. Preoperative prostate volume was assessed with transrectal ultrasound. If any of the following four conditions were not met: (a) preoperative volume = intraoperative volume, (b) D90% = 100%, (c) [Formula: see text] , and (d) seed ordering matched the in‐house nomogram, then a normalization factor was applied to the number of seeds used intraoperatively to meet all four conditions. Four published nomograms, an in‐house nomogram, and the normalized number of implanted seeds for each patient were plotted against intraoperative prostate volume. Of the 226 patients, 223 had excess seeds at the completion of their PSI. On average, 25.7 ± 9.9% of ordered seeds were not implanted. Excess seeds were separated into two categories, accounted‐for excess, determined by the four normalization factors, and residual excess, assumed to be due to overordering. The upper 99.9% CI linear fit of the normalized clinical data plus a 5% “cushion” may provide a more reasonable nomogram for (103)Pd seed ordering for our institution. Nomograms customized for individual institutions may reduce seed waste, thereby reducing radiation safety risks and increasing the value of prostate brachytherapy.