Cargando…

Dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in VMAT breast radiotherapy

AIM: Traditional radiotherapy treatment techniques of the breast are insensitive for deformations and swelling of the soft tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose changes seen with tissue deformations using different image matching methods when VMAT technique was used, and compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossi, Maija, Boman, Eeva, Skyttä, Tanja, Haltamo, Mikko, Laaksomaa, Marko, Kapanen, Mika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29978548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12409
_version_ 1783352803188539392
author Rossi, Maija
Boman, Eeva
Skyttä, Tanja
Haltamo, Mikko
Laaksomaa, Marko
Kapanen, Mika
author_facet Rossi, Maija
Boman, Eeva
Skyttä, Tanja
Haltamo, Mikko
Laaksomaa, Marko
Kapanen, Mika
author_sort Rossi, Maija
collection PubMed
description AIM: Traditional radiotherapy treatment techniques of the breast are insensitive for deformations and swelling of the soft tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose changes seen with tissue deformations using different image matching methods when VMAT technique was used, and compare these with tangential technique. METHODS: The study included 24 patients with breast or chest wall irradiations, nine of whom were bilateral. In addition to planar kV setup imaging, patients underwent weekly cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to evaluate soft tissue deformations. The effect of the deformations was evaluated on VMAT plans optimized with 5‐mm virtual bolus to create skin flash, and compared to standard tangential plans with 2.5 cm skin flash. Isocenter positioning using 2D imaging and CBCT were compared. RESULTS: With postural changes and soft tissue deformations, the target coverage decreased more in the VMAT plans than in the tangential plans. The planned V90% coverage was 98.3% and 99.0% in the tangential and VMAT plans, respectively. When tattoo‐based setup and online 2D match were used, the coverage decreased to 97.9% in tangential and 96.5% in VMAT plans (P < 0.001). With automatic CBCT‐based image match the respective coverages were 98.3% and 98.8%. In the cases of large soft tissue deformations, the replanning was needed for the VMAT plan, whereas the tangential plan still covered the whole target volume. CONCLUSIONS: The skin flash created using an optimization bolus for VMAT plans was in most cases enough to take into account the soft tissue deformations seen in breast VMAT treatments. However, in some cases larger skin flash or replanning were needed. The use of 2D match decreased the target coverage for VMAT plans but not for FinF plans when compared to 3D match. The use of CBCT match is recommended when treating breast/chest wall patients with VMAT technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6123165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61231652018-09-10 Dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in VMAT breast radiotherapy Rossi, Maija Boman, Eeva Skyttä, Tanja Haltamo, Mikko Laaksomaa, Marko Kapanen, Mika J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics AIM: Traditional radiotherapy treatment techniques of the breast are insensitive for deformations and swelling of the soft tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose changes seen with tissue deformations using different image matching methods when VMAT technique was used, and compare these with tangential technique. METHODS: The study included 24 patients with breast or chest wall irradiations, nine of whom were bilateral. In addition to planar kV setup imaging, patients underwent weekly cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to evaluate soft tissue deformations. The effect of the deformations was evaluated on VMAT plans optimized with 5‐mm virtual bolus to create skin flash, and compared to standard tangential plans with 2.5 cm skin flash. Isocenter positioning using 2D imaging and CBCT were compared. RESULTS: With postural changes and soft tissue deformations, the target coverage decreased more in the VMAT plans than in the tangential plans. The planned V90% coverage was 98.3% and 99.0% in the tangential and VMAT plans, respectively. When tattoo‐based setup and online 2D match were used, the coverage decreased to 97.9% in tangential and 96.5% in VMAT plans (P < 0.001). With automatic CBCT‐based image match the respective coverages were 98.3% and 98.8%. In the cases of large soft tissue deformations, the replanning was needed for the VMAT plan, whereas the tangential plan still covered the whole target volume. CONCLUSIONS: The skin flash created using an optimization bolus for VMAT plans was in most cases enough to take into account the soft tissue deformations seen in breast VMAT treatments. However, in some cases larger skin flash or replanning were needed. The use of 2D match decreased the target coverage for VMAT plans but not for FinF plans when compared to 3D match. The use of CBCT match is recommended when treating breast/chest wall patients with VMAT technique. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6123165/ /pubmed/29978548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12409 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Rossi, Maija
Boman, Eeva
Skyttä, Tanja
Haltamo, Mikko
Laaksomaa, Marko
Kapanen, Mika
Dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in VMAT breast radiotherapy
title Dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in VMAT breast radiotherapy
title_full Dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in VMAT breast radiotherapy
title_fullStr Dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in VMAT breast radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in VMAT breast radiotherapy
title_short Dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in VMAT breast radiotherapy
title_sort dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in vmat breast radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29978548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12409
work_keys_str_mv AT rossimaija dosimetriceffectsofanatomicaldeformationsandpositioningerrorsinvmatbreastradiotherapy
AT bomaneeva dosimetriceffectsofanatomicaldeformationsandpositioningerrorsinvmatbreastradiotherapy
AT skyttatanja dosimetriceffectsofanatomicaldeformationsandpositioningerrorsinvmatbreastradiotherapy
AT haltamomikko dosimetriceffectsofanatomicaldeformationsandpositioningerrorsinvmatbreastradiotherapy
AT laaksomaamarko dosimetriceffectsofanatomicaldeformationsandpositioningerrorsinvmatbreastradiotherapy
AT kapanenmika dosimetriceffectsofanatomicaldeformationsandpositioningerrorsinvmatbreastradiotherapy