Cargando…
Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort
Background and purpose: The optimal anesthetic management of acute ischemic stroke patients during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. In this post-hoc analysis, we investigated the impact of anesthesia type on clinical outcomes in patients included in SWIFT PRIME trial. Methods: Nin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00702 |
_version_ | 1783352826715439104 |
---|---|
author | Eker, Omer F. Saver, Jeffrey L. Goyal, Mayank Jahan, Reza Levy, Elad I. Nogueira, Raul G. Yavagal, Dileep R. Bonafé, Alain |
author_facet | Eker, Omer F. Saver, Jeffrey L. Goyal, Mayank Jahan, Reza Levy, Elad I. Nogueira, Raul G. Yavagal, Dileep R. Bonafé, Alain |
author_sort | Eker, Omer F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and purpose: The optimal anesthetic management of acute ischemic stroke patients during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. In this post-hoc analysis, we investigated the impact of anesthesia type on clinical outcomes in patients included in SWIFT PRIME trial. Methods: Ninety-seven patients treated with MT were included. Patients treated in centers with general anesthesia (GA) policy (n = 32) were compared with those treated in centers with conscious sedation (CS) policy (n = 65). Primary outcomes studied included times to treatment initiation (TTI), rates of successful recanalization (TICI 2b/3), and functional independence (mRS 0–2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, lowest systolic and diastolic blood pressures (LSBP and LDBP) during MT. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression logistic modeling were conducted. Results: The GA-policy and CS-policy groups presented comparable TTI (94 ± 36 min vs. 102 ± 48 min; p = 0.44), rates of TICI 2b/3 recanalization (22/32 [68.8%] vs. 51/65 [78.5%]; p = 0.32). CS-policy was associated to higher rate of functional independence than GA-policy, but the difference was not significant (43/65 [66.2%] vs. 16/32 [50.0%]; p = 0.18). GA-policy patients had a higher rate of postoperative pneumonia (11/32 [34.4%] vs. 8/65 [12.3%]; p = 0.02) and lower LSBP (110 [30,160] mmHg vs. 119 [77,170] mmHg; p = 0.03) and LDBP (55 (15,75) mmHg vs. 67 [40,121]; p < 0.001). When corrected for differences in baseline characteristics, GA-policy was associated with lower rate of functional independence (OR 0.32; p = 0.05). A 10-point increase in perprocedural LDBP was associated with an increased likelihood of favorable outcome (OR 1.51; p = 0.01). Conclusions: GA-policy for MT presented comparable TTI and rates of successful revascularization to CS-policy. However, GA-policy was associated with lower rates of functional independence and with higher incidence of perprocedural hypotension and postoperative pneumonia. Clinical Trial Registration: URL—http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01657461 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6123376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61233762018-09-12 Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort Eker, Omer F. Saver, Jeffrey L. Goyal, Mayank Jahan, Reza Levy, Elad I. Nogueira, Raul G. Yavagal, Dileep R. Bonafé, Alain Front Neurol Neurology Background and purpose: The optimal anesthetic management of acute ischemic stroke patients during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. In this post-hoc analysis, we investigated the impact of anesthesia type on clinical outcomes in patients included in SWIFT PRIME trial. Methods: Ninety-seven patients treated with MT were included. Patients treated in centers with general anesthesia (GA) policy (n = 32) were compared with those treated in centers with conscious sedation (CS) policy (n = 65). Primary outcomes studied included times to treatment initiation (TTI), rates of successful recanalization (TICI 2b/3), and functional independence (mRS 0–2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, lowest systolic and diastolic blood pressures (LSBP and LDBP) during MT. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression logistic modeling were conducted. Results: The GA-policy and CS-policy groups presented comparable TTI (94 ± 36 min vs. 102 ± 48 min; p = 0.44), rates of TICI 2b/3 recanalization (22/32 [68.8%] vs. 51/65 [78.5%]; p = 0.32). CS-policy was associated to higher rate of functional independence than GA-policy, but the difference was not significant (43/65 [66.2%] vs. 16/32 [50.0%]; p = 0.18). GA-policy patients had a higher rate of postoperative pneumonia (11/32 [34.4%] vs. 8/65 [12.3%]; p = 0.02) and lower LSBP (110 [30,160] mmHg vs. 119 [77,170] mmHg; p = 0.03) and LDBP (55 (15,75) mmHg vs. 67 [40,121]; p < 0.001). When corrected for differences in baseline characteristics, GA-policy was associated with lower rate of functional independence (OR 0.32; p = 0.05). A 10-point increase in perprocedural LDBP was associated with an increased likelihood of favorable outcome (OR 1.51; p = 0.01). Conclusions: GA-policy for MT presented comparable TTI and rates of successful revascularization to CS-policy. However, GA-policy was associated with lower rates of functional independence and with higher incidence of perprocedural hypotension and postoperative pneumonia. Clinical Trial Registration: URL—http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01657461 Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6123376/ /pubmed/30210431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00702 Text en Copyright © 2018 Eker, Saver, Goyal, Jahan, Levy, Nogueira, Yavagal, Bonafé and SWIFT PRIME investigators. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Eker, Omer F. Saver, Jeffrey L. Goyal, Mayank Jahan, Reza Levy, Elad I. Nogueira, Raul G. Yavagal, Dileep R. Bonafé, Alain Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort |
title | Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort |
title_full | Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort |
title_fullStr | Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort |
title_short | Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort |
title_sort | impact of anesthetic management on safety and outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke in swift prime cohort |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ekeromerf impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort AT saverjeffreyl impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort AT goyalmayank impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort AT jahanreza impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort AT levyeladi impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort AT nogueiraraulg impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort AT yavagaldileepr impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort AT bonafealain impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort AT impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort |