Cargando…

Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort

Background and purpose: The optimal anesthetic management of acute ischemic stroke patients during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. In this post-hoc analysis, we investigated the impact of anesthesia type on clinical outcomes in patients included in SWIFT PRIME trial. Methods: Nin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eker, Omer F., Saver, Jeffrey L., Goyal, Mayank, Jahan, Reza, Levy, Elad I., Nogueira, Raul G., Yavagal, Dileep R., Bonafé, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00702
_version_ 1783352826715439104
author Eker, Omer F.
Saver, Jeffrey L.
Goyal, Mayank
Jahan, Reza
Levy, Elad I.
Nogueira, Raul G.
Yavagal, Dileep R.
Bonafé, Alain
author_facet Eker, Omer F.
Saver, Jeffrey L.
Goyal, Mayank
Jahan, Reza
Levy, Elad I.
Nogueira, Raul G.
Yavagal, Dileep R.
Bonafé, Alain
author_sort Eker, Omer F.
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose: The optimal anesthetic management of acute ischemic stroke patients during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. In this post-hoc analysis, we investigated the impact of anesthesia type on clinical outcomes in patients included in SWIFT PRIME trial. Methods: Ninety-seven patients treated with MT were included. Patients treated in centers with general anesthesia (GA) policy (n = 32) were compared with those treated in centers with conscious sedation (CS) policy (n = 65). Primary outcomes studied included times to treatment initiation (TTI), rates of successful recanalization (TICI 2b/3), and functional independence (mRS 0–2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, lowest systolic and diastolic blood pressures (LSBP and LDBP) during MT. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression logistic modeling were conducted. Results: The GA-policy and CS-policy groups presented comparable TTI (94 ± 36 min vs. 102 ± 48 min; p = 0.44), rates of TICI 2b/3 recanalization (22/32 [68.8%] vs. 51/65 [78.5%]; p = 0.32). CS-policy was associated to higher rate of functional independence than GA-policy, but the difference was not significant (43/65 [66.2%] vs. 16/32 [50.0%]; p = 0.18). GA-policy patients had a higher rate of postoperative pneumonia (11/32 [34.4%] vs. 8/65 [12.3%]; p = 0.02) and lower LSBP (110 [30,160] mmHg vs. 119 [77,170] mmHg; p = 0.03) and LDBP (55 (15,75) mmHg vs. 67 [40,121]; p < 0.001). When corrected for differences in baseline characteristics, GA-policy was associated with lower rate of functional independence (OR 0.32; p = 0.05). A 10-point increase in perprocedural LDBP was associated with an increased likelihood of favorable outcome (OR 1.51; p = 0.01). Conclusions: GA-policy for MT presented comparable TTI and rates of successful revascularization to CS-policy. However, GA-policy was associated with lower rates of functional independence and with higher incidence of perprocedural hypotension and postoperative pneumonia. Clinical Trial Registration: URL—http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01657461
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6123376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61233762018-09-12 Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort Eker, Omer F. Saver, Jeffrey L. Goyal, Mayank Jahan, Reza Levy, Elad I. Nogueira, Raul G. Yavagal, Dileep R. Bonafé, Alain Front Neurol Neurology Background and purpose: The optimal anesthetic management of acute ischemic stroke patients during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. In this post-hoc analysis, we investigated the impact of anesthesia type on clinical outcomes in patients included in SWIFT PRIME trial. Methods: Ninety-seven patients treated with MT were included. Patients treated in centers with general anesthesia (GA) policy (n = 32) were compared with those treated in centers with conscious sedation (CS) policy (n = 65). Primary outcomes studied included times to treatment initiation (TTI), rates of successful recanalization (TICI 2b/3), and functional independence (mRS 0–2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, lowest systolic and diastolic blood pressures (LSBP and LDBP) during MT. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression logistic modeling were conducted. Results: The GA-policy and CS-policy groups presented comparable TTI (94 ± 36 min vs. 102 ± 48 min; p = 0.44), rates of TICI 2b/3 recanalization (22/32 [68.8%] vs. 51/65 [78.5%]; p = 0.32). CS-policy was associated to higher rate of functional independence than GA-policy, but the difference was not significant (43/65 [66.2%] vs. 16/32 [50.0%]; p = 0.18). GA-policy patients had a higher rate of postoperative pneumonia (11/32 [34.4%] vs. 8/65 [12.3%]; p = 0.02) and lower LSBP (110 [30,160] mmHg vs. 119 [77,170] mmHg; p = 0.03) and LDBP (55 (15,75) mmHg vs. 67 [40,121]; p < 0.001). When corrected for differences in baseline characteristics, GA-policy was associated with lower rate of functional independence (OR 0.32; p = 0.05). A 10-point increase in perprocedural LDBP was associated with an increased likelihood of favorable outcome (OR 1.51; p = 0.01). Conclusions: GA-policy for MT presented comparable TTI and rates of successful revascularization to CS-policy. However, GA-policy was associated with lower rates of functional independence and with higher incidence of perprocedural hypotension and postoperative pneumonia. Clinical Trial Registration: URL—http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01657461 Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6123376/ /pubmed/30210431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00702 Text en Copyright © 2018 Eker, Saver, Goyal, Jahan, Levy, Nogueira, Yavagal, Bonafé and SWIFT PRIME investigators. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Eker, Omer F.
Saver, Jeffrey L.
Goyal, Mayank
Jahan, Reza
Levy, Elad I.
Nogueira, Raul G.
Yavagal, Dileep R.
Bonafé, Alain
Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort
title Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort
title_full Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort
title_fullStr Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort
title_short Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort
title_sort impact of anesthetic management on safety and outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke in swift prime cohort
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00702
work_keys_str_mv AT ekeromerf impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort
AT saverjeffreyl impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort
AT goyalmayank impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort
AT jahanreza impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort
AT levyeladi impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort
AT nogueiraraulg impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort
AT yavagaldileepr impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort
AT bonafealain impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort
AT impactofanestheticmanagementonsafetyandoutcomesfollowingmechanicalthrombectomyforischemicstrokeinswiftprimecohort