Cargando…

The Fibrotic Substrate in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Comparison Between Predictions From Computational Modeling and Measurements From Focal Impulse and Rotor Mapping

Focal impulse and rotor mapping (FIRM) involves intracardiac detection and catheter ablation of re-entrant drivers (RDs), some of which may contribute to arrhythmia perpetuation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). Patient-specific computational models derived from late gadolinium-enhanced magn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyle, Patrick M., Hakim, Joe B., Zahid, Sohail, Franceschi, William H., Murphy, Michael J., Prakosa, Adityo, Aronis, Konstantinos N., Zghaib, Tarek, Balouch, Muhammed, Ipek, Esra G., Chrispin, Jonathan, Berger, Ronald D., Ashikaga, Hiroshi, Marine, Joseph E., Calkins, Hugh, Nazarian, Saman, Spragg, David D., Trayanova, Natalia A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01151
Descripción
Sumario:Focal impulse and rotor mapping (FIRM) involves intracardiac detection and catheter ablation of re-entrant drivers (RDs), some of which may contribute to arrhythmia perpetuation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). Patient-specific computational models derived from late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) has the potential to non-invasively identify all areas of the fibrotic substrate where RDs could potentially be sustained, including locations where RDs may not manifest during mapped AF episodes. The objective of this study was to carry out multi-modal assessment of the arrhythmogenic propensity of the fibrotic substrate in PsAF patients by comparing locations of RD-harboring regions found in simulations and detected by FIRM (RD(sim) and RD(FIRM)) and analyze implications for ablation strategies predicated on targeting RDs. For 11 PsAF patients who underwent pre-procedure LGE-MRI and FIRM-guided ablation, we retrospectively simulated AF in individualized atrial models, with geometry and fibrosis distribution reconstructed from pre-ablation LGE-MRI scans, and identified RD(sim) sites. Regions harboring RD(sim) and RD(FIRM) were compared. RD(sim) were found in 38 atrial regions (median [inter-quartile range (IQR)] = 4 [3; 4] per model). RD(FIRM) were identified and subsequently ablated in 24 atrial regions (2 [1; 3] per patient), which was significantly fewer than the number of RD(sim)-harboring regions in corresponding models (p < 0.05). Computational modeling predicted RD(sim) in 20 of 24 (83%) atrial regions identified as RD(FIRM)-harboring during clinical mapping. In a large number of cases, we uncovered RD(sim)-harboring regions in which RD(FIRM) were never observed (18/22 regions that differed between the two modalities; 82%); we termed such cases “latent” RD(sim) sites. During follow-up (230 [180; 326] days), AF recurrence occurred in 7/11 (64%) individuals. Interestingly, latent RD(sim) sites were observed in all seven computational models corresponding to patients who experienced recurrent AF (2 [2; 2] per patient); in contrast, latent RD(sim) sites were only discovered in two of four patients who were free from AF during follow-up (0.5 [0; 1.5] per patient; p < 0.05 vs. patients with AF recurrence). We conclude that substrate-based ablation based on computational modeling could improve outcomes.