Cargando…

Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) have been applied to many research issues because these stimulation techniques can modulate neural activity in the human brain painlessly and non-invasively with weak electrical currents. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsumoto, Hideyuki, Ugawa, Yoshikazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2016.12.003
_version_ 1783352915034898432
author Matsumoto, Hideyuki
Ugawa, Yoshikazu
author_facet Matsumoto, Hideyuki
Ugawa, Yoshikazu
author_sort Matsumoto, Hideyuki
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) have been applied to many research issues because these stimulation techniques can modulate neural activity in the human brain painlessly and non-invasively with weak electrical currents. However, there are no formal safety guidelines for the selection of stimulus parameters in either tDCS or tACS. As a means of gathering the information that is needed to produce safety guidelines, in this article, we summarize the adverse events of tDCS and tACS. In both stimulation techniques, most adverse effects are mild and disappear soon after stimulation. Nevertheless, several papers have reported that, in tDCS, some adverse events persist even after stimulation. The persistent events consist of skin lesions similar to burns, which can arise even in healthy subjects, and mania or hypomania in patients with depression. Recently, one paper reported a pediatric patient presenting with seizure after tDCS, although the causal relationship between stimulation and seizure is not clear. As this seizure is the only serious adverse events yet reported in connection with tDCS, tDCS is considered safe. In tACS, meanwhile, no persistent adverse events have been reported, but considerably fewer reports are available on the safety of tACS than on the safety of tDCS. Therefore, to establish the safety of tDCS and tACS, we need to scan the literature continuously for information on the adverse events of both stimulation techniques. Further safety investigations are also required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6123849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61238492018-09-13 Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review Matsumoto, Hideyuki Ugawa, Yoshikazu Clin Neurophysiol Pract Reviews, Expert Opinions and Guideline Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) have been applied to many research issues because these stimulation techniques can modulate neural activity in the human brain painlessly and non-invasively with weak electrical currents. However, there are no formal safety guidelines for the selection of stimulus parameters in either tDCS or tACS. As a means of gathering the information that is needed to produce safety guidelines, in this article, we summarize the adverse events of tDCS and tACS. In both stimulation techniques, most adverse effects are mild and disappear soon after stimulation. Nevertheless, several papers have reported that, in tDCS, some adverse events persist even after stimulation. The persistent events consist of skin lesions similar to burns, which can arise even in healthy subjects, and mania or hypomania in patients with depression. Recently, one paper reported a pediatric patient presenting with seizure after tDCS, although the causal relationship between stimulation and seizure is not clear. As this seizure is the only serious adverse events yet reported in connection with tDCS, tDCS is considered safe. In tACS, meanwhile, no persistent adverse events have been reported, but considerably fewer reports are available on the safety of tACS than on the safety of tDCS. Therefore, to establish the safety of tDCS and tACS, we need to scan the literature continuously for information on the adverse events of both stimulation techniques. Further safety investigations are also required. Elsevier 2016-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6123849/ /pubmed/30214966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2016.12.003 Text en © 2016 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Reviews, Expert Opinions and Guideline
Matsumoto, Hideyuki
Ugawa, Yoshikazu
Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review
title Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review
title_full Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review
title_fullStr Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review
title_full_unstemmed Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review
title_short Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review
title_sort adverse events of tdcs and tacs: a review
topic Reviews, Expert Opinions and Guideline
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2016.12.003
work_keys_str_mv AT matsumotohideyuki adverseeventsoftdcsandtacsareview
AT ugawayoshikazu adverseeventsoftdcsandtacsareview