Cargando…
Proof of Kernel Work: a democratic low-energy consensus for distributed access-control protocols
We adjust the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism used in Bitcoin and Ethereum so that we can build on its strength while also addressing, in part, some of its perceived weaknesses. Notably, our work is motivated by the high energy consumption for mining PoW, and we want to restrict the use of P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180422 |
_version_ | 1783352954111131648 |
---|---|
author | Lundbæk, Leif-Nissen Janes Beutel, Daniel Huth, Michael Jackson, Stephen Kirk, Laurence Steiner, Robert |
author_facet | Lundbæk, Leif-Nissen Janes Beutel, Daniel Huth, Michael Jackson, Stephen Kirk, Laurence Steiner, Robert |
author_sort | Lundbæk, Leif-Nissen |
collection | PubMed |
description | We adjust the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism used in Bitcoin and Ethereum so that we can build on its strength while also addressing, in part, some of its perceived weaknesses. Notably, our work is motivated by the high energy consumption for mining PoW, and we want to restrict the use of PoW to a configurable, expected size of nodes, as a function of the local blockchain state. The approach we develop for this rests on three pillars: (i) Proof of Kernel Work (PoKW), a means of dynamically reducing the set of nodes that can participate in the solving of PoW puzzles such that an adversary cannot increase his attack surface because of such a reduction; (ii) Practical Adaptation of Existing Technology, a realization of this PoW reduction through an adaptation of existing blockchain and enterprise technology stacks; and (iii) Machine Learning for Adaptive System Resiliency, the use of techniques from artificial intelligence to make our approach adaptive to system, network and attack dynamics. We develop here, in detail, the first pillar and illustrate the second pillar through a real use case, a pilot project done with Porsche on controlling permissions to vehicle and data log accesses. We also discuss pertinent attack vectors for PoKW consensus and their mitigation. Moreover, we sketch how our approach may lead to more democratic PoKW-based blockchain systems for public networks that may inherit the resilience of blockchains based on PoW. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6124024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Royal Society Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61240242018-09-17 Proof of Kernel Work: a democratic low-energy consensus for distributed access-control protocols Lundbæk, Leif-Nissen Janes Beutel, Daniel Huth, Michael Jackson, Stephen Kirk, Laurence Steiner, Robert R Soc Open Sci Computer Science We adjust the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism used in Bitcoin and Ethereum so that we can build on its strength while also addressing, in part, some of its perceived weaknesses. Notably, our work is motivated by the high energy consumption for mining PoW, and we want to restrict the use of PoW to a configurable, expected size of nodes, as a function of the local blockchain state. The approach we develop for this rests on three pillars: (i) Proof of Kernel Work (PoKW), a means of dynamically reducing the set of nodes that can participate in the solving of PoW puzzles such that an adversary cannot increase his attack surface because of such a reduction; (ii) Practical Adaptation of Existing Technology, a realization of this PoW reduction through an adaptation of existing blockchain and enterprise technology stacks; and (iii) Machine Learning for Adaptive System Resiliency, the use of techniques from artificial intelligence to make our approach adaptive to system, network and attack dynamics. We develop here, in detail, the first pillar and illustrate the second pillar through a real use case, a pilot project done with Porsche on controlling permissions to vehicle and data log accesses. We also discuss pertinent attack vectors for PoKW consensus and their mitigation. Moreover, we sketch how our approach may lead to more democratic PoKW-based blockchain systems for public networks that may inherit the resilience of blockchains based on PoW. The Royal Society Publishing 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6124024/ /pubmed/30225029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180422 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Computer Science Lundbæk, Leif-Nissen Janes Beutel, Daniel Huth, Michael Jackson, Stephen Kirk, Laurence Steiner, Robert Proof of Kernel Work: a democratic low-energy consensus for distributed access-control protocols |
title | Proof of Kernel Work: a democratic low-energy consensus for distributed access-control protocols |
title_full | Proof of Kernel Work: a democratic low-energy consensus for distributed access-control protocols |
title_fullStr | Proof of Kernel Work: a democratic low-energy consensus for distributed access-control protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | Proof of Kernel Work: a democratic low-energy consensus for distributed access-control protocols |
title_short | Proof of Kernel Work: a democratic low-energy consensus for distributed access-control protocols |
title_sort | proof of kernel work: a democratic low-energy consensus for distributed access-control protocols |
topic | Computer Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lundbækleifnissen proofofkernelworkademocraticlowenergyconsensusfordistributedaccesscontrolprotocols AT janesbeuteldaniel proofofkernelworkademocraticlowenergyconsensusfordistributedaccesscontrolprotocols AT huthmichael proofofkernelworkademocraticlowenergyconsensusfordistributedaccesscontrolprotocols AT jacksonstephen proofofkernelworkademocraticlowenergyconsensusfordistributedaccesscontrolprotocols AT kirklaurence proofofkernelworkademocraticlowenergyconsensusfordistributedaccesscontrolprotocols AT steinerrobert proofofkernelworkademocraticlowenergyconsensusfordistributedaccesscontrolprotocols |