Cargando…

Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?

The process of domestication has long fascinated evolutionary biologists, yielding insights into the rapidity with which selection can alter behaviour and morphology. Previous studies on dogs, cattle and pigeons have demonstrated that domesticated forms show greater magnitudes of morphological varia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stange, Madlen, Núñez-León, Daniel, Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R., Jensen, Per, Wilson, Laura A. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180993
_version_ 1783352957574578176
author Stange, Madlen
Núñez-León, Daniel
Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.
Jensen, Per
Wilson, Laura A. B.
author_facet Stange, Madlen
Núñez-León, Daniel
Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.
Jensen, Per
Wilson, Laura A. B.
author_sort Stange, Madlen
collection PubMed
description The process of domestication has long fascinated evolutionary biologists, yielding insights into the rapidity with which selection can alter behaviour and morphology. Previous studies on dogs, cattle and pigeons have demonstrated that domesticated forms show greater magnitudes of morphological variation than their wild ancestors. Here, we quantify variation in skull morphology, modularity and integration in chickens and compare those to the wild fowl using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics and multivariate statistics. Similar to other domesticated species, chickens exhibit a greater magnitude of variation in shape compared with their ancestors. The most variable part of the chicken skull is the cranial vault, being formed by dermal and neural crest-derived bones, its form possibly related to brain shape variation in chickens, especially in crested breeds. Neural crest-derived portions of the skull exhibit a higher amount of variation. Further, we find that the chicken skull is strongly integrated, confirming previous studies in birds, in contrast to the presence of modularity and decreased integration in mammals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6124038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61240382018-09-17 Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens? Stange, Madlen Núñez-León, Daniel Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. Jensen, Per Wilson, Laura A. B. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) The process of domestication has long fascinated evolutionary biologists, yielding insights into the rapidity with which selection can alter behaviour and morphology. Previous studies on dogs, cattle and pigeons have demonstrated that domesticated forms show greater magnitudes of morphological variation than their wild ancestors. Here, we quantify variation in skull morphology, modularity and integration in chickens and compare those to the wild fowl using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics and multivariate statistics. Similar to other domesticated species, chickens exhibit a greater magnitude of variation in shape compared with their ancestors. The most variable part of the chicken skull is the cranial vault, being formed by dermal and neural crest-derived bones, its form possibly related to brain shape variation in chickens, especially in crested breeds. Neural crest-derived portions of the skull exhibit a higher amount of variation. Further, we find that the chicken skull is strongly integrated, confirming previous studies in birds, in contrast to the presence of modularity and decreased integration in mammals. The Royal Society Publishing 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6124038/ /pubmed/30225085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180993 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Stange, Madlen
Núñez-León, Daniel
Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.
Jensen, Per
Wilson, Laura A. B.
Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?
title Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?
title_full Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?
title_fullStr Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?
title_full_unstemmed Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?
title_short Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?
title_sort morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180993
work_keys_str_mv AT stangemadlen morphologicalvariationunderdomesticationhowvariablearechickens
AT nunezleondaniel morphologicalvariationunderdomesticationhowvariablearechickens
AT sanchezvillagramarcelor morphologicalvariationunderdomesticationhowvariablearechickens
AT jensenper morphologicalvariationunderdomesticationhowvariablearechickens
AT wilsonlauraab morphologicalvariationunderdomesticationhowvariablearechickens