Cargando…

Exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a useful and noninvasive biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation, particularly in asthma. However, its utility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Zhiyu, Huang, Weina, Wang, Linfeng, Xu, Ning, Ding, Qunli, Cao, Chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214187
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S165780
_version_ 1783353029560369152
author Lu, Zhiyu
Huang, Weina
Wang, Linfeng
Xu, Ning
Ding, Qunli
Cao, Chao
author_facet Lu, Zhiyu
Huang, Weina
Wang, Linfeng
Xu, Ning
Ding, Qunli
Cao, Chao
author_sort Lu, Zhiyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a useful and noninvasive biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation, particularly in asthma. However, its utility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate FENO levels in COPD. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registry was conducted from inception to January 2018. Studies were included if they reported FENO levels in patients with COPD and healthy controls. We then extracted relevant information and analyzed data. Standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2,073 studies were reviewed for eligibility, with 24 studies pooled for analysis. The FENO levels in patients with COPD were elevated mildly compared with healthy controls (SMD 1.28, 95% CI 0.60–1.96). A similar result was also observed in stable COPD, with an SMD of 1.21 (95% CI 0.47–1.96). On the other hand, we found no association between FENO levels and exacerbated COPD. Additionally, for patients with COPD, ex-smokers had higher levels of FENO than current smokers (SMD 2.05, 95% CI 1.13–2.97). CONCLUSION: Our studies demonstrated a mild elevation of FENO in COPD, and the association between exacerbated COPD and FENO levels needs to be further explored. The potential mechanism is still unknown and conflicting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6124452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61244522018-09-13 Exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lu, Zhiyu Huang, Weina Wang, Linfeng Xu, Ning Ding, Qunli Cao, Chao Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Review BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a useful and noninvasive biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation, particularly in asthma. However, its utility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate FENO levels in COPD. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registry was conducted from inception to January 2018. Studies were included if they reported FENO levels in patients with COPD and healthy controls. We then extracted relevant information and analyzed data. Standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2,073 studies were reviewed for eligibility, with 24 studies pooled for analysis. The FENO levels in patients with COPD were elevated mildly compared with healthy controls (SMD 1.28, 95% CI 0.60–1.96). A similar result was also observed in stable COPD, with an SMD of 1.21 (95% CI 0.47–1.96). On the other hand, we found no association between FENO levels and exacerbated COPD. Additionally, for patients with COPD, ex-smokers had higher levels of FENO than current smokers (SMD 2.05, 95% CI 1.13–2.97). CONCLUSION: Our studies demonstrated a mild elevation of FENO in COPD, and the association between exacerbated COPD and FENO levels needs to be further explored. The potential mechanism is still unknown and conflicting. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6124452/ /pubmed/30214187 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S165780 Text en © 2018 Lu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Lu, Zhiyu
Huang, Weina
Wang, Linfeng
Xu, Ning
Ding, Qunli
Cao, Chao
Exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort exhaled nitric oxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214187
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S165780
work_keys_str_mv AT luzhiyu exhalednitricoxideinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangweina exhalednitricoxideinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanglinfeng exhalednitricoxideinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuning exhalednitricoxideinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dingqunli exhalednitricoxideinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caochao exhalednitricoxideinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis