Cargando…
Computed tomography with a stomach protocol and virtual gastroscopy in the staging of gastric cancer: an initial experience
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography with a stomach protocol in staging of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 14 patients who underwent computed tomography in a 16-channel scanner for preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma between Septembe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por
Imagem
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0097 |
_version_ | 1783353048130650112 |
---|---|
author | Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda Verza, Leonardo Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira Boaventura, Camila Silva Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Chojniak, Rubens |
author_facet | Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda Verza, Leonardo Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira Boaventura, Camila Silva Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Chojniak, Rubens |
author_sort | Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography with a stomach protocol in staging of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 14 patients who underwent computed tomography in a 16-channel scanner for preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma between September 2015 and December 2016. All images were analyzed by the same radiologist, who had extensive experience in abdominal cancer imaging. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the method were calculated by comparing it with the pathology result. All patients underwent partial or total gastrectomy. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.5 years, and 53.8% of the patients were male. The gastric lesions were classified as T1/T2 in 35.7% of the cases, as T3 in 28.5%, and as T4 in 35.7%. Eleven patients (68.7%) had suspicious (N positive) lymph nodes. The accuracy of the T1/T2, T3, T4, and lymph node staging tests was 85%, 78%, 90%, and 78%, respectively. The respective sensitivity and specificity values were 71% and 100% for T1/T2, 66% and 81% for T3, 100% and 90% for T4, and 88% and 60% for lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: Multidetector computed tomography with a stomach protocol, used in conjunction with virtual gastroscopy, shows good accuracy in the tumor and lymph node staging of gastric adenocarcinoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6124583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por
Imagem |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61245832018-09-10 Computed tomography with a stomach protocol and virtual gastroscopy in the staging of gastric cancer: an initial experience Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda Verza, Leonardo Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira Boaventura, Camila Silva Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Chojniak, Rubens Radiol Bras Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography with a stomach protocol in staging of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 14 patients who underwent computed tomography in a 16-channel scanner for preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma between September 2015 and December 2016. All images were analyzed by the same radiologist, who had extensive experience in abdominal cancer imaging. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the method were calculated by comparing it with the pathology result. All patients underwent partial or total gastrectomy. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.5 years, and 53.8% of the patients were male. The gastric lesions were classified as T1/T2 in 35.7% of the cases, as T3 in 28.5%, and as T4 in 35.7%. Eleven patients (68.7%) had suspicious (N positive) lymph nodes. The accuracy of the T1/T2, T3, T4, and lymph node staging tests was 85%, 78%, 90%, and 78%, respectively. The respective sensitivity and specificity values were 71% and 100% for T1/T2, 66% and 81% for T3, 100% and 90% for T4, and 88% and 60% for lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: Multidetector computed tomography with a stomach protocol, used in conjunction with virtual gastroscopy, shows good accuracy in the tumor and lymph node staging of gastric adenocarcinoma. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6124583/ /pubmed/30202123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0097 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Almeida, Maria Fernanda Arruda Verza, Leonardo Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira Boaventura, Camila Silva Barbosa, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Chojniak, Rubens Computed tomography with a stomach protocol and virtual gastroscopy in the staging of gastric cancer: an initial experience |
title | Computed tomography with a stomach protocol and virtual gastroscopy
in the staging of gastric cancer: an initial experience |
title_full | Computed tomography with a stomach protocol and virtual gastroscopy
in the staging of gastric cancer: an initial experience |
title_fullStr | Computed tomography with a stomach protocol and virtual gastroscopy
in the staging of gastric cancer: an initial experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Computed tomography with a stomach protocol and virtual gastroscopy
in the staging of gastric cancer: an initial experience |
title_short | Computed tomography with a stomach protocol and virtual gastroscopy
in the staging of gastric cancer: an initial experience |
title_sort | computed tomography with a stomach protocol and virtual gastroscopy
in the staging of gastric cancer: an initial experience |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almeidamariafernandaarruda computedtomographywithastomachprotocolandvirtualgastroscopyinthestagingofgastriccanceraninitialexperience AT verzaleonardo computedtomographywithastomachprotocolandvirtualgastroscopyinthestagingofgastriccanceraninitialexperience AT bitencourtalmirgalvaovieira computedtomographywithastomachprotocolandvirtualgastroscopyinthestagingofgastriccanceraninitialexperience AT boaventuracamilasilva computedtomographywithastomachprotocolandvirtualgastroscopyinthestagingofgastriccanceraninitialexperience AT barbosapaulanicolevieirapinto computedtomographywithastomachprotocolandvirtualgastroscopyinthestagingofgastriccanceraninitialexperience AT chojniakrubens computedtomographywithastomachprotocolandvirtualgastroscopyinthestagingofgastriccanceraninitialexperience |