Cargando…

Treatment preferences among Japanese women with dysmenorrhea: results from a discrete choice experiment study

PURPOSE: To examine patient preferences for oral and intrauterine system treatments for dysmenorrhea in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted to assess the willingness to accept trade-offs among hypothetical treatment profiles. An internet-based survey was administe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akiyama, Sayako, Goren, Amir, Basurto, Enrique, Komori, Tetsushi, Harada, Tasuku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214165
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S166332
_version_ 1783353083645919232
author Akiyama, Sayako
Goren, Amir
Basurto, Enrique
Komori, Tetsushi
Harada, Tasuku
author_facet Akiyama, Sayako
Goren, Amir
Basurto, Enrique
Komori, Tetsushi
Harada, Tasuku
author_sort Akiyama, Sayako
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine patient preferences for oral and intrauterine system treatments for dysmenorrhea in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted to assess the willingness to accept trade-offs among hypothetical treatment profiles. An internet-based survey was administered to women 18–49 years of age who self-reported a dysmenorrhea diagnosis or experienced dysmenorrhea at least once in the past 6 months (N=309). Choice questions included pairs of treatments presented with different attributes: mode of administration, reduction in bleeding after 6 months, chance of symptoms becoming “improved”, nausea, weight gain, irregular bleeding, and risk of venous thromboembolism. Relative importance (RI) estimates were computed. RESULTS: The mean respondent age was 35.8 years (standard deviation =7.0), and 85 women (27.5%) reported that they had previously used hormonal therapy for dysmenorrhea. Treatment preference was most strongly associated with mode of administration (RI=49.8%), followed by chance of irregular bleeding (RI=17.3%). In contrast, treatment preference was most weakly associated with chance of weight gain (RI=2.4%) and reduction in bleeding after 6 months (RI=0.8%). Respondents preferred oral treatments: for twice-daily regimen, odds ratio (OR)=4.90; for once-daily fixed cyclic regimen, OR=4.20; and for once-daily flexible extended regimen, OR=2.44; whereas for intrauterine system, OR=0.02 (p<0.001 for all). Those with prior hormonal therapy experience exhibited the same pattern. CONCLUSION: Mode of administration factored heavily in dysmenorrhea treatment preferences. Women of reproductive age preferred oral medication, especially twice-daily regimen and once-daily fixed cyclic regimen. Findings can potentially help to improve physician–patient communication and treatment decision making. Physicians should consider factors that can influence patient preference to optimize treatment acceptance and adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6124802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61248022018-09-13 Treatment preferences among Japanese women with dysmenorrhea: results from a discrete choice experiment study Akiyama, Sayako Goren, Amir Basurto, Enrique Komori, Tetsushi Harada, Tasuku Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: To examine patient preferences for oral and intrauterine system treatments for dysmenorrhea in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted to assess the willingness to accept trade-offs among hypothetical treatment profiles. An internet-based survey was administered to women 18–49 years of age who self-reported a dysmenorrhea diagnosis or experienced dysmenorrhea at least once in the past 6 months (N=309). Choice questions included pairs of treatments presented with different attributes: mode of administration, reduction in bleeding after 6 months, chance of symptoms becoming “improved”, nausea, weight gain, irregular bleeding, and risk of venous thromboembolism. Relative importance (RI) estimates were computed. RESULTS: The mean respondent age was 35.8 years (standard deviation =7.0), and 85 women (27.5%) reported that they had previously used hormonal therapy for dysmenorrhea. Treatment preference was most strongly associated with mode of administration (RI=49.8%), followed by chance of irregular bleeding (RI=17.3%). In contrast, treatment preference was most weakly associated with chance of weight gain (RI=2.4%) and reduction in bleeding after 6 months (RI=0.8%). Respondents preferred oral treatments: for twice-daily regimen, odds ratio (OR)=4.90; for once-daily fixed cyclic regimen, OR=4.20; and for once-daily flexible extended regimen, OR=2.44; whereas for intrauterine system, OR=0.02 (p<0.001 for all). Those with prior hormonal therapy experience exhibited the same pattern. CONCLUSION: Mode of administration factored heavily in dysmenorrhea treatment preferences. Women of reproductive age preferred oral medication, especially twice-daily regimen and once-daily fixed cyclic regimen. Findings can potentially help to improve physician–patient communication and treatment decision making. Physicians should consider factors that can influence patient preference to optimize treatment acceptance and adherence. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6124802/ /pubmed/30214165 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S166332 Text en © 2018 Akiyama et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Akiyama, Sayako
Goren, Amir
Basurto, Enrique
Komori, Tetsushi
Harada, Tasuku
Treatment preferences among Japanese women with dysmenorrhea: results from a discrete choice experiment study
title Treatment preferences among Japanese women with dysmenorrhea: results from a discrete choice experiment study
title_full Treatment preferences among Japanese women with dysmenorrhea: results from a discrete choice experiment study
title_fullStr Treatment preferences among Japanese women with dysmenorrhea: results from a discrete choice experiment study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment preferences among Japanese women with dysmenorrhea: results from a discrete choice experiment study
title_short Treatment preferences among Japanese women with dysmenorrhea: results from a discrete choice experiment study
title_sort treatment preferences among japanese women with dysmenorrhea: results from a discrete choice experiment study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214165
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S166332
work_keys_str_mv AT akiyamasayako treatmentpreferencesamongjapanesewomenwithdysmenorrhearesultsfromadiscretechoiceexperimentstudy
AT gorenamir treatmentpreferencesamongjapanesewomenwithdysmenorrhearesultsfromadiscretechoiceexperimentstudy
AT basurtoenrique treatmentpreferencesamongjapanesewomenwithdysmenorrhearesultsfromadiscretechoiceexperimentstudy
AT komoritetsushi treatmentpreferencesamongjapanesewomenwithdysmenorrhearesultsfromadiscretechoiceexperimentstudy
AT haradatasuku treatmentpreferencesamongjapanesewomenwithdysmenorrhearesultsfromadiscretechoiceexperimentstudy