Cargando…

Dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with Statistical Parametric Mapping in molecular neuroimaging

PURPOSE: PET and SPECT voxel kinetics are highly noised. To our knowledge, no study has determined the effect of denoising on the ability to detect differences in binding at the voxel level using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). METHODS: In the present study, groups of subject-images with a 10%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsartsalis, Stergios, Tournier, Benjamin B., Graf, Christophe E., Ginovart, Nathalie, Ibáñez, Vicente, Millet, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30183783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203589
_version_ 1783353085371875328
author Tsartsalis, Stergios
Tournier, Benjamin B.
Graf, Christophe E.
Ginovart, Nathalie
Ibáñez, Vicente
Millet, Philippe
author_facet Tsartsalis, Stergios
Tournier, Benjamin B.
Graf, Christophe E.
Ginovart, Nathalie
Ibáñez, Vicente
Millet, Philippe
author_sort Tsartsalis, Stergios
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: PET and SPECT voxel kinetics are highly noised. To our knowledge, no study has determined the effect of denoising on the ability to detect differences in binding at the voxel level using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). METHODS: In the present study, groups of subject-images with a 10%- and 20%- difference in binding of [(123)I]iomazenil (IMZ) were simulated. They were denoised with Factor Analysis (FA). Parametric images of binding potential (BP(ND)) were produced with the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) and the Logan non-invasive graphical analysis (LNIGA) and analyzed using SPM to detect group differences. FA was also applied to [(123)I]IMZ and [(11)C]flumazenil (FMZ) clinical images (n = 4) and the variance of BP(ND) was evaluated. RESULTS: Estimations from FA-denoised simulated images provided a more favorable bias-precision profile in SRTM and LNIGA quantification. Simulated differences were detected in a higher number of voxels when denoised simulated images were used for voxel-wise estimations, compared to quantification on raw simulated images. Variability of voxel-wise binding estimations on denoised clinical SPECT and PET images was also significantly diminished. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, noise removal from dynamic brain SPECT and PET images may optimize voxel-wise BP(ND) estimations and detection of biological differences using SPM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6124809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61248092018-09-16 Dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with Statistical Parametric Mapping in molecular neuroimaging Tsartsalis, Stergios Tournier, Benjamin B. Graf, Christophe E. Ginovart, Nathalie Ibáñez, Vicente Millet, Philippe PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: PET and SPECT voxel kinetics are highly noised. To our knowledge, no study has determined the effect of denoising on the ability to detect differences in binding at the voxel level using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). METHODS: In the present study, groups of subject-images with a 10%- and 20%- difference in binding of [(123)I]iomazenil (IMZ) were simulated. They were denoised with Factor Analysis (FA). Parametric images of binding potential (BP(ND)) were produced with the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) and the Logan non-invasive graphical analysis (LNIGA) and analyzed using SPM to detect group differences. FA was also applied to [(123)I]IMZ and [(11)C]flumazenil (FMZ) clinical images (n = 4) and the variance of BP(ND) was evaluated. RESULTS: Estimations from FA-denoised simulated images provided a more favorable bias-precision profile in SRTM and LNIGA quantification. Simulated differences were detected in a higher number of voxels when denoised simulated images were used for voxel-wise estimations, compared to quantification on raw simulated images. Variability of voxel-wise binding estimations on denoised clinical SPECT and PET images was also significantly diminished. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, noise removal from dynamic brain SPECT and PET images may optimize voxel-wise BP(ND) estimations and detection of biological differences using SPM. Public Library of Science 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6124809/ /pubmed/30183783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203589 Text en © 2018 Tsartsalis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tsartsalis, Stergios
Tournier, Benjamin B.
Graf, Christophe E.
Ginovart, Nathalie
Ibáñez, Vicente
Millet, Philippe
Dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with Statistical Parametric Mapping in molecular neuroimaging
title Dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with Statistical Parametric Mapping in molecular neuroimaging
title_full Dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with Statistical Parametric Mapping in molecular neuroimaging
title_fullStr Dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with Statistical Parametric Mapping in molecular neuroimaging
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with Statistical Parametric Mapping in molecular neuroimaging
title_short Dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with Statistical Parametric Mapping in molecular neuroimaging
title_sort dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with statistical parametric mapping in molecular neuroimaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6124809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30183783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203589
work_keys_str_mv AT tsartsalisstergios dynamicimagedenoisingforvoxelwisequantificationwithstatisticalparametricmappinginmolecularneuroimaging
AT tournierbenjaminb dynamicimagedenoisingforvoxelwisequantificationwithstatisticalparametricmappinginmolecularneuroimaging
AT grafchristophee dynamicimagedenoisingforvoxelwisequantificationwithstatisticalparametricmappinginmolecularneuroimaging
AT ginovartnathalie dynamicimagedenoisingforvoxelwisequantificationwithstatisticalparametricmappinginmolecularneuroimaging
AT ibanezvicente dynamicimagedenoisingforvoxelwisequantificationwithstatisticalparametricmappinginmolecularneuroimaging
AT milletphilippe dynamicimagedenoisingforvoxelwisequantificationwithstatisticalparametricmappinginmolecularneuroimaging