Cargando…

High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the first-line treatment of adult patients with exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNT) might benefit patients with hypoxemia and can reduce physiological dead space. We hypothesized that HFNT and NIV would similarly r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sklar, Michael C., Dres, Martin, Rittayamai, Nuttapol, West, Brent, Grieco, Domenico Luca, Telias, Irene, Junhasavasdikul, Detajin, Rauseo, Michela, Pham, Tai, Madotto, Fabiana, Campbell, Carolyn, Tullis, Elizabeth, Brochard, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30187270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4
_version_ 1783353123281043456
author Sklar, Michael C.
Dres, Martin
Rittayamai, Nuttapol
West, Brent
Grieco, Domenico Luca
Telias, Irene
Junhasavasdikul, Detajin
Rauseo, Michela
Pham, Tai
Madotto, Fabiana
Campbell, Carolyn
Tullis, Elizabeth
Brochard, Laurent
author_facet Sklar, Michael C.
Dres, Martin
Rittayamai, Nuttapol
West, Brent
Grieco, Domenico Luca
Telias, Irene
Junhasavasdikul, Detajin
Rauseo, Michela
Pham, Tai
Madotto, Fabiana
Campbell, Carolyn
Tullis, Elizabeth
Brochard, Laurent
author_sort Sklar, Michael C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the first-line treatment of adult patients with exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNT) might benefit patients with hypoxemia and can reduce physiological dead space. We hypothesized that HFNT and NIV would similarly reduce work of breathing and improving breathing pattern in CF patients. Our objective was to compare the effects of HFNT versus NIV in terms of work of breathing, assessed noninvasively by the thickening fraction of the diaphragm (TFdi, measured with ultrasound), breathing pattern, transcutaneous CO(2) (PtcCO(2)), hemodynamics, dyspnea and comfort. METHODS: Adult CF patients who had been stabilized after requiring ventilatory support for a few days were enrolled and ventilated with HFNT and NIV for 30 min in crossover random order. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. Compared to baseline, HFNT, but not NIV, reduced respiratory rate (by 3 breaths/min, p = 0.01) and minute ventilation (by 2 L/min, p = 0.01). Patients also took slightly larger tidal volumes with HFNT compared to NIV (p = 0.02). TFdi per breath was similar under the two techniques and did not change from baseline. MAP increased from baseline with NIV and compared to HFNT (p ≤ 0.01). Comfort was poorer with the application of both HFNT and NIV than baseline. No differences were found for heart rate, SpO(2), PtcCO(2) or dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: In adult CF patients stabilized after indication for ventilatory support, HFNT and NIV have similar effects on diaphragmatic work per breath, but high-flow therapy confers additional physiological benefits by decreasing respiratory rate and minute ventilation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethics Committee of St. Michael’s Hospital (REB #14-338) and clinicaltrial.gov (NCT02262871). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6125258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61252582018-09-11 High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study Sklar, Michael C. Dres, Martin Rittayamai, Nuttapol West, Brent Grieco, Domenico Luca Telias, Irene Junhasavasdikul, Detajin Rauseo, Michela Pham, Tai Madotto, Fabiana Campbell, Carolyn Tullis, Elizabeth Brochard, Laurent Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the first-line treatment of adult patients with exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNT) might benefit patients with hypoxemia and can reduce physiological dead space. We hypothesized that HFNT and NIV would similarly reduce work of breathing and improving breathing pattern in CF patients. Our objective was to compare the effects of HFNT versus NIV in terms of work of breathing, assessed noninvasively by the thickening fraction of the diaphragm (TFdi, measured with ultrasound), breathing pattern, transcutaneous CO(2) (PtcCO(2)), hemodynamics, dyspnea and comfort. METHODS: Adult CF patients who had been stabilized after requiring ventilatory support for a few days were enrolled and ventilated with HFNT and NIV for 30 min in crossover random order. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. Compared to baseline, HFNT, but not NIV, reduced respiratory rate (by 3 breaths/min, p = 0.01) and minute ventilation (by 2 L/min, p = 0.01). Patients also took slightly larger tidal volumes with HFNT compared to NIV (p = 0.02). TFdi per breath was similar under the two techniques and did not change from baseline. MAP increased from baseline with NIV and compared to HFNT (p ≤ 0.01). Comfort was poorer with the application of both HFNT and NIV than baseline. No differences were found for heart rate, SpO(2), PtcCO(2) or dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: In adult CF patients stabilized after indication for ventilatory support, HFNT and NIV have similar effects on diaphragmatic work per breath, but high-flow therapy confers additional physiological benefits by decreasing respiratory rate and minute ventilation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethics Committee of St. Michael’s Hospital (REB #14-338) and clinicaltrial.gov (NCT02262871). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6125258/ /pubmed/30187270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Sklar, Michael C.
Dres, Martin
Rittayamai, Nuttapol
West, Brent
Grieco, Domenico Luca
Telias, Irene
Junhasavasdikul, Detajin
Rauseo, Michela
Pham, Tai
Madotto, Fabiana
Campbell, Carolyn
Tullis, Elizabeth
Brochard, Laurent
High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study
title High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study
title_full High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study
title_fullStr High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study
title_full_unstemmed High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study
title_short High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study
title_sort high-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30187270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sklarmichaelc highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT dresmartin highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT rittayamainuttapol highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT westbrent highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT griecodomenicoluca highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT teliasirene highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT junhasavasdikuldetajin highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT rauseomichela highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT phamtai highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT madottofabiana highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT campbellcarolyn highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT tulliselizabeth highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy
AT brochardlaurent highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy