Cargando…
High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the first-line treatment of adult patients with exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNT) might benefit patients with hypoxemia and can reduce physiological dead space. We hypothesized that HFNT and NIV would similarly r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30187270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4 |
_version_ | 1783353123281043456 |
---|---|
author | Sklar, Michael C. Dres, Martin Rittayamai, Nuttapol West, Brent Grieco, Domenico Luca Telias, Irene Junhasavasdikul, Detajin Rauseo, Michela Pham, Tai Madotto, Fabiana Campbell, Carolyn Tullis, Elizabeth Brochard, Laurent |
author_facet | Sklar, Michael C. Dres, Martin Rittayamai, Nuttapol West, Brent Grieco, Domenico Luca Telias, Irene Junhasavasdikul, Detajin Rauseo, Michela Pham, Tai Madotto, Fabiana Campbell, Carolyn Tullis, Elizabeth Brochard, Laurent |
author_sort | Sklar, Michael C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the first-line treatment of adult patients with exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNT) might benefit patients with hypoxemia and can reduce physiological dead space. We hypothesized that HFNT and NIV would similarly reduce work of breathing and improving breathing pattern in CF patients. Our objective was to compare the effects of HFNT versus NIV in terms of work of breathing, assessed noninvasively by the thickening fraction of the diaphragm (TFdi, measured with ultrasound), breathing pattern, transcutaneous CO(2) (PtcCO(2)), hemodynamics, dyspnea and comfort. METHODS: Adult CF patients who had been stabilized after requiring ventilatory support for a few days were enrolled and ventilated with HFNT and NIV for 30 min in crossover random order. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. Compared to baseline, HFNT, but not NIV, reduced respiratory rate (by 3 breaths/min, p = 0.01) and minute ventilation (by 2 L/min, p = 0.01). Patients also took slightly larger tidal volumes with HFNT compared to NIV (p = 0.02). TFdi per breath was similar under the two techniques and did not change from baseline. MAP increased from baseline with NIV and compared to HFNT (p ≤ 0.01). Comfort was poorer with the application of both HFNT and NIV than baseline. No differences were found for heart rate, SpO(2), PtcCO(2) or dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: In adult CF patients stabilized after indication for ventilatory support, HFNT and NIV have similar effects on diaphragmatic work per breath, but high-flow therapy confers additional physiological benefits by decreasing respiratory rate and minute ventilation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethics Committee of St. Michael’s Hospital (REB #14-338) and clinicaltrial.gov (NCT02262871). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6125258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61252582018-09-11 High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study Sklar, Michael C. Dres, Martin Rittayamai, Nuttapol West, Brent Grieco, Domenico Luca Telias, Irene Junhasavasdikul, Detajin Rauseo, Michela Pham, Tai Madotto, Fabiana Campbell, Carolyn Tullis, Elizabeth Brochard, Laurent Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the first-line treatment of adult patients with exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNT) might benefit patients with hypoxemia and can reduce physiological dead space. We hypothesized that HFNT and NIV would similarly reduce work of breathing and improving breathing pattern in CF patients. Our objective was to compare the effects of HFNT versus NIV in terms of work of breathing, assessed noninvasively by the thickening fraction of the diaphragm (TFdi, measured with ultrasound), breathing pattern, transcutaneous CO(2) (PtcCO(2)), hemodynamics, dyspnea and comfort. METHODS: Adult CF patients who had been stabilized after requiring ventilatory support for a few days were enrolled and ventilated with HFNT and NIV for 30 min in crossover random order. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. Compared to baseline, HFNT, but not NIV, reduced respiratory rate (by 3 breaths/min, p = 0.01) and minute ventilation (by 2 L/min, p = 0.01). Patients also took slightly larger tidal volumes with HFNT compared to NIV (p = 0.02). TFdi per breath was similar under the two techniques and did not change from baseline. MAP increased from baseline with NIV and compared to HFNT (p ≤ 0.01). Comfort was poorer with the application of both HFNT and NIV than baseline. No differences were found for heart rate, SpO(2), PtcCO(2) or dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: In adult CF patients stabilized after indication for ventilatory support, HFNT and NIV have similar effects on diaphragmatic work per breath, but high-flow therapy confers additional physiological benefits by decreasing respiratory rate and minute ventilation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethics Committee of St. Michael’s Hospital (REB #14-338) and clinicaltrial.gov (NCT02262871). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6125258/ /pubmed/30187270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Sklar, Michael C. Dres, Martin Rittayamai, Nuttapol West, Brent Grieco, Domenico Luca Telias, Irene Junhasavasdikul, Detajin Rauseo, Michela Pham, Tai Madotto, Fabiana Campbell, Carolyn Tullis, Elizabeth Brochard, Laurent High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study |
title | High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study |
title_full | High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study |
title_fullStr | High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study |
title_full_unstemmed | High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study |
title_short | High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study |
title_sort | high-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30187270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sklarmichaelc highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT dresmartin highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT rittayamainuttapol highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT westbrent highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT griecodomenicoluca highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT teliasirene highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT junhasavasdikuldetajin highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT rauseomichela highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT phamtai highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT madottofabiana highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT campbellcarolyn highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT tulliselizabeth highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy AT brochardlaurent highflownasaloxygenversusnoninvasiveventilationinadultpatientswithcysticfibrosisarandomizedcrossoverphysiologicalstudy |