Cargando…
Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial Groups
Prejudicial attitudes are widely seen between human groups, with significant consequences. Actions taken in light of prejudice result in discrimination, and can contribute to societal division and hostile behaviours. We define a new class of group, the prejudicial group, with membership based on a c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31363-z |
_version_ | 1783353152862420992 |
---|---|
author | Whitaker, Roger M. Colombo, Gualtiero B. Rand, David G. |
author_facet | Whitaker, Roger M. Colombo, Gualtiero B. Rand, David G. |
author_sort | Whitaker, Roger M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prejudicial attitudes are widely seen between human groups, with significant consequences. Actions taken in light of prejudice result in discrimination, and can contribute to societal division and hostile behaviours. We define a new class of group, the prejudicial group, with membership based on a common prejudicial attitude towards the out-group. It is assumed that prejudice acts as a phenotypic tag, enabling groups to form and identify themselves on this basis. Using computational simulation, we study the evolution of prejudicial groups, where members interact through indirect reciprocity. We observe how cooperation and prejudice coevolve, with cooperation being directed in-group. We also consider the co-evolution of these variables when out-group interaction and global learning are immutable, emulating the possible pluralism of a society. Diversity through three factors is found to be influential, namely out-group interaction, out-group learning and number of sub-populations. Additionally populations with greater in-group interaction promote both cooperation and prejudice, while global rather than local learning promotes cooperation and reduces prejudice. The results also demonstrate that prejudice is not dependent on sophisticated human cognition and is easily manifested in simple agents with limited intelligence, having potential implications for future autonomous systems and human-machine interaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6125379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61253792018-09-10 Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial Groups Whitaker, Roger M. Colombo, Gualtiero B. Rand, David G. Sci Rep Article Prejudicial attitudes are widely seen between human groups, with significant consequences. Actions taken in light of prejudice result in discrimination, and can contribute to societal division and hostile behaviours. We define a new class of group, the prejudicial group, with membership based on a common prejudicial attitude towards the out-group. It is assumed that prejudice acts as a phenotypic tag, enabling groups to form and identify themselves on this basis. Using computational simulation, we study the evolution of prejudicial groups, where members interact through indirect reciprocity. We observe how cooperation and prejudice coevolve, with cooperation being directed in-group. We also consider the co-evolution of these variables when out-group interaction and global learning are immutable, emulating the possible pluralism of a society. Diversity through three factors is found to be influential, namely out-group interaction, out-group learning and number of sub-populations. Additionally populations with greater in-group interaction promote both cooperation and prejudice, while global rather than local learning promotes cooperation and reduces prejudice. The results also demonstrate that prejudice is not dependent on sophisticated human cognition and is easily manifested in simple agents with limited intelligence, having potential implications for future autonomous systems and human-machine interaction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6125379/ /pubmed/30185868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31363-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Whitaker, Roger M. Colombo, Gualtiero B. Rand, David G. Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial Groups |
title | Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial Groups |
title_full | Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial Groups |
title_fullStr | Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial Groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial Groups |
title_short | Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial Groups |
title_sort | indirect reciprocity and the evolution of prejudicial groups |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31363-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitakerrogerm indirectreciprocityandtheevolutionofprejudicialgroups AT colombogualtierob indirectreciprocityandtheevolutionofprejudicialgroups AT randdavidg indirectreciprocityandtheevolutionofprejudicialgroups |