Cargando…
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison among left ventricular bipolar, quadripolar and active fixation leads
We evaluated the performance of 3 different left ventricular leads (LV) for resynchronization therapy: bipolar (BL), quadripolar (QL) and active fixation leads (AFL). We enrolled 290 consecutive CRTD candidates implanted with BL (n = 136) or QL (n = 97) or AFL (n = 57). Over a minimum 10 months foll...
Autores principales: | Ziacchi, M., Diemberger, I., Corzani, A., Martignani, C., Mazzotti, A., Massaro, G., Valzania, C., Rapezzi, C., Boriani, G., Biffi, M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31692-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in persistent left superior vena cava: Can you do it two-leads-only?
por: Biffi, Mauro, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
New left ventricular active fixation lead: The experience of lead extraction
por: Ziacchi, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Performance and clinical comparison between left ventricular quadripolar and bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Observational research
por: Ziacchi, M., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
QRS pattern and improvement in right and left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a radionuclide study
por: Domenichini, Giulia, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Performance of an active fixation bipolar left ventricular lead vs passive fixation quadripolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy, a randomized trial
por: Keilegavlen, Havard, et al.
Publicado: (2020)