Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas

Targeted therapy is lagging behind in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To guide the development of new treatment strategies, we provide an overview of the prognostic biomarkers in resectable EAC treated with curative intent. The Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were systematically searched, fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Creemers, Aafke, Ebbing, Eva A., Pelgrim, Thomas C., Lagarde, Sjoerd M., van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S., van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I., Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M., Krishnadath, Kausilia K., Meijer, Sybren L., Bijlsma, Maarten F., van Oijen, Martijn G. H., van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31548-6
_version_ 1783353173372567552
author Creemers, Aafke
Ebbing, Eva A.
Pelgrim, Thomas C.
Lagarde, Sjoerd M.
van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S.
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M.
Krishnadath, Kausilia K.
Meijer, Sybren L.
Bijlsma, Maarten F.
van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
author_facet Creemers, Aafke
Ebbing, Eva A.
Pelgrim, Thomas C.
Lagarde, Sjoerd M.
van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S.
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M.
Krishnadath, Kausilia K.
Meijer, Sybren L.
Bijlsma, Maarten F.
van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
author_sort Creemers, Aafke
collection PubMed
description Targeted therapy is lagging behind in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To guide the development of new treatment strategies, we provide an overview of the prognostic biomarkers in resectable EAC treated with curative intent. The Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were systematically searched, focusing on overall survival (OS). The quality of the studies was assessed using a scoring system ranging from 0–7 points based on modified REMARK criteria. To evaluate all identified prognostic biomarkers, the hallmarks of cancer were adapted to fit all biomarkers based on their biological function in EAC, resulting in the features angiogenesis, cell adhesion and extra-cellular matrix remodeling, cell cycle, immune, invasion and metastasis, proliferation, and self-renewal. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived by random effects meta-analyses performed on each hallmarks of cancer feature. Of the 3298 unique articles identified, 84 were included, with a mean quality of 5.9 points (range 3.5–7). The hallmarks of cancer feature ‘immune’ was most significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.88, (95%CI 1.20–2.93)). Of the 82 unique prognostic biomarkers identified, meta-analyses showed prominent biomarkers, including COX-2, PAK-1, p14ARF, PD-L1, MET, LC3B, IGFBP7 and LGR5, associated to each hallmark of cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6125467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61254672018-09-10 A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas Creemers, Aafke Ebbing, Eva A. Pelgrim, Thomas C. Lagarde, Sjoerd M. van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M. Krishnadath, Kausilia K. Meijer, Sybren L. Bijlsma, Maarten F. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. Sci Rep Article Targeted therapy is lagging behind in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To guide the development of new treatment strategies, we provide an overview of the prognostic biomarkers in resectable EAC treated with curative intent. The Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were systematically searched, focusing on overall survival (OS). The quality of the studies was assessed using a scoring system ranging from 0–7 points based on modified REMARK criteria. To evaluate all identified prognostic biomarkers, the hallmarks of cancer were adapted to fit all biomarkers based on their biological function in EAC, resulting in the features angiogenesis, cell adhesion and extra-cellular matrix remodeling, cell cycle, immune, invasion and metastasis, proliferation, and self-renewal. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived by random effects meta-analyses performed on each hallmarks of cancer feature. Of the 3298 unique articles identified, 84 were included, with a mean quality of 5.9 points (range 3.5–7). The hallmarks of cancer feature ‘immune’ was most significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.88, (95%CI 1.20–2.93)). Of the 82 unique prognostic biomarkers identified, meta-analyses showed prominent biomarkers, including COX-2, PAK-1, p14ARF, PD-L1, MET, LC3B, IGFBP7 and LGR5, associated to each hallmark of cancer. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6125467/ /pubmed/30185893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31548-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Creemers, Aafke
Ebbing, Eva A.
Pelgrim, Thomas C.
Lagarde, Sjoerd M.
van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S.
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M.
Krishnadath, Kausilia K.
Meijer, Sybren L.
Bijlsma, Maarten F.
van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31548-6
work_keys_str_mv AT creemersaafke asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT ebbingevaa asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT pelgrimthomasc asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT lagardesjoerdm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT vanettenjamaludinfaridis asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT hulshofmaartenccm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT krishnadathkausiliak asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT meijersybrenl asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT bijlsmamaartenf asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT vanoijenmartijngh asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT creemersaafke systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT ebbingevaa systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT pelgrimthomasc systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT lagardesjoerdm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT vanettenjamaludinfaridis systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT hulshofmaartenccm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT krishnadathkausiliak systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT meijersybrenl systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT bijlsmamaartenf systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT vanoijenmartijngh systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas
AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas