Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas
Targeted therapy is lagging behind in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To guide the development of new treatment strategies, we provide an overview of the prognostic biomarkers in resectable EAC treated with curative intent. The Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were systematically searched, fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31548-6 |
_version_ | 1783353173372567552 |
---|---|
author | Creemers, Aafke Ebbing, Eva A. Pelgrim, Thomas C. Lagarde, Sjoerd M. van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M. Krishnadath, Kausilia K. Meijer, Sybren L. Bijlsma, Maarten F. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. |
author_facet | Creemers, Aafke Ebbing, Eva A. Pelgrim, Thomas C. Lagarde, Sjoerd M. van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M. Krishnadath, Kausilia K. Meijer, Sybren L. Bijlsma, Maarten F. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. |
author_sort | Creemers, Aafke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Targeted therapy is lagging behind in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To guide the development of new treatment strategies, we provide an overview of the prognostic biomarkers in resectable EAC treated with curative intent. The Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were systematically searched, focusing on overall survival (OS). The quality of the studies was assessed using a scoring system ranging from 0–7 points based on modified REMARK criteria. To evaluate all identified prognostic biomarkers, the hallmarks of cancer were adapted to fit all biomarkers based on their biological function in EAC, resulting in the features angiogenesis, cell adhesion and extra-cellular matrix remodeling, cell cycle, immune, invasion and metastasis, proliferation, and self-renewal. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived by random effects meta-analyses performed on each hallmarks of cancer feature. Of the 3298 unique articles identified, 84 were included, with a mean quality of 5.9 points (range 3.5–7). The hallmarks of cancer feature ‘immune’ was most significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.88, (95%CI 1.20–2.93)). Of the 82 unique prognostic biomarkers identified, meta-analyses showed prominent biomarkers, including COX-2, PAK-1, p14ARF, PD-L1, MET, LC3B, IGFBP7 and LGR5, associated to each hallmark of cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6125467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61254672018-09-10 A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas Creemers, Aafke Ebbing, Eva A. Pelgrim, Thomas C. Lagarde, Sjoerd M. van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M. Krishnadath, Kausilia K. Meijer, Sybren L. Bijlsma, Maarten F. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. Sci Rep Article Targeted therapy is lagging behind in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To guide the development of new treatment strategies, we provide an overview of the prognostic biomarkers in resectable EAC treated with curative intent. The Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were systematically searched, focusing on overall survival (OS). The quality of the studies was assessed using a scoring system ranging from 0–7 points based on modified REMARK criteria. To evaluate all identified prognostic biomarkers, the hallmarks of cancer were adapted to fit all biomarkers based on their biological function in EAC, resulting in the features angiogenesis, cell adhesion and extra-cellular matrix remodeling, cell cycle, immune, invasion and metastasis, proliferation, and self-renewal. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived by random effects meta-analyses performed on each hallmarks of cancer feature. Of the 3298 unique articles identified, 84 were included, with a mean quality of 5.9 points (range 3.5–7). The hallmarks of cancer feature ‘immune’ was most significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.88, (95%CI 1.20–2.93)). Of the 82 unique prognostic biomarkers identified, meta-analyses showed prominent biomarkers, including COX-2, PAK-1, p14ARF, PD-L1, MET, LC3B, IGFBP7 and LGR5, associated to each hallmark of cancer. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6125467/ /pubmed/30185893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31548-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Creemers, Aafke Ebbing, Eva A. Pelgrim, Thomas C. Lagarde, Sjoerd M. van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M. Krishnadath, Kausilia K. Meijer, Sybren L. Bijlsma, Maarten F. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31548-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT creemersaafke asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT ebbingevaa asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT pelgrimthomasc asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT lagardesjoerdm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT vanettenjamaludinfaridis asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT hulshofmaartenccm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT krishnadathkausiliak asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT meijersybrenl asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT bijlsmamaartenf asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT vanoijenmartijngh asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT creemersaafke systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT ebbingevaa systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT pelgrimthomasc systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT lagardesjoerdm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT vanettenjamaludinfaridis systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT hulshofmaartenccm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT krishnadathkausiliak systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT meijersybrenl systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT bijlsmamaartenf systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT vanoijenmartijngh systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticbiomarkersinresectableesophagealadenocarcinomas |