Cargando…

Differences in Cross-Sectional Intervertebral Foraminal Area From C3 to C7

STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical comparative study. OBJECTIVES: Few studies have evaluated foraminal areas in the cervical spine without degenerative changes. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the mean cross-sectional foraminal areas between the C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 levels while a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knapik, Derrick M., Abola, Matthew V., Gordon, Zachary L., Seiler, John G., Marcus, Randall E., Liu, Raymond W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218758085
_version_ 1783353242520911872
author Knapik, Derrick M.
Abola, Matthew V.
Gordon, Zachary L.
Seiler, John G.
Marcus, Randall E.
Liu, Raymond W.
author_facet Knapik, Derrick M.
Abola, Matthew V.
Gordon, Zachary L.
Seiler, John G.
Marcus, Randall E.
Liu, Raymond W.
author_sort Knapik, Derrick M.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical comparative study. OBJECTIVES: Few studies have evaluated foraminal areas in the cervical spine without degenerative changes. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the mean cross-sectional foraminal areas between the C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 levels while also analyzing specimens for differences between sexes and races. METHODS: We performed an anatomic study of the intervertebral foramen at 4 levels (C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, C6/7) in 100 skeletally mature osseous specimens. Specimens were selected to obtain equal number of African American and Caucasian males and females (n = 25/group) aged 20 to 40 years at time of death. Foramina were photographed bilaterally with and without a silicone rubber disc. The maximal vertical height and mid-sagittal width of each foramen were digitally measured and the areas were calculated using an ellipse as a model. RESULTS: The average age at death for all specimens was 30 ± 6 years. The mean cross-sectional area of the C4/5 foramen was significantly smaller compared with the C5/6 (P < .001). C5/6 was significantly narrower than C6/7 (P < .001) foramen with and without disc augmentation. C3/4 was not significantly different from more caudal levels. There was no difference between male and female specimens, while African Americans had smaller foraminal sizes than Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the largest anatomical reference of the cervical intervertebral foramen. In a mature spine without facet joint hypertrophy or osteophytic changes, the C4/5 foramen was narrower than C5/6, which was narrower than C6/7. Understanding the relative foraminal areas in the nonpathological cervical spine is crucial to understanding degenerative changes as well as the anatomical changes in pathologies that affect the intervertebral foramen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6125938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61259382018-09-10 Differences in Cross-Sectional Intervertebral Foraminal Area From C3 to C7 Knapik, Derrick M. Abola, Matthew V. Gordon, Zachary L. Seiler, John G. Marcus, Randall E. Liu, Raymond W. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical comparative study. OBJECTIVES: Few studies have evaluated foraminal areas in the cervical spine without degenerative changes. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the mean cross-sectional foraminal areas between the C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 levels while also analyzing specimens for differences between sexes and races. METHODS: We performed an anatomic study of the intervertebral foramen at 4 levels (C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, C6/7) in 100 skeletally mature osseous specimens. Specimens were selected to obtain equal number of African American and Caucasian males and females (n = 25/group) aged 20 to 40 years at time of death. Foramina were photographed bilaterally with and without a silicone rubber disc. The maximal vertical height and mid-sagittal width of each foramen were digitally measured and the areas were calculated using an ellipse as a model. RESULTS: The average age at death for all specimens was 30 ± 6 years. The mean cross-sectional area of the C4/5 foramen was significantly smaller compared with the C5/6 (P < .001). C5/6 was significantly narrower than C6/7 (P < .001) foramen with and without disc augmentation. C3/4 was not significantly different from more caudal levels. There was no difference between male and female specimens, while African Americans had smaller foraminal sizes than Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the largest anatomical reference of the cervical intervertebral foramen. In a mature spine without facet joint hypertrophy or osteophytic changes, the C4/5 foramen was narrower than C5/6, which was narrower than C6/7. Understanding the relative foraminal areas in the nonpathological cervical spine is crucial to understanding degenerative changes as well as the anatomical changes in pathologies that affect the intervertebral foramen. SAGE Publications 2018-03-18 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6125938/ /pubmed/30202714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218758085 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Knapik, Derrick M.
Abola, Matthew V.
Gordon, Zachary L.
Seiler, John G.
Marcus, Randall E.
Liu, Raymond W.
Differences in Cross-Sectional Intervertebral Foraminal Area From C3 to C7
title Differences in Cross-Sectional Intervertebral Foraminal Area From C3 to C7
title_full Differences in Cross-Sectional Intervertebral Foraminal Area From C3 to C7
title_fullStr Differences in Cross-Sectional Intervertebral Foraminal Area From C3 to C7
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Cross-Sectional Intervertebral Foraminal Area From C3 to C7
title_short Differences in Cross-Sectional Intervertebral Foraminal Area From C3 to C7
title_sort differences in cross-sectional intervertebral foraminal area from c3 to c7
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6125938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218758085
work_keys_str_mv AT knapikderrickm differencesincrosssectionalintervertebralforaminalareafromc3toc7
AT abolamatthewv differencesincrosssectionalintervertebralforaminalareafromc3toc7
AT gordonzacharyl differencesincrosssectionalintervertebralforaminalareafromc3toc7
AT seilerjohng differencesincrosssectionalintervertebralforaminalareafromc3toc7
AT marcusrandalle differencesincrosssectionalintervertebralforaminalareafromc3toc7
AT liuraymondw differencesincrosssectionalintervertebralforaminalareafromc3toc7