Cargando…

Comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starches have been withdrawn from the European market. In Sweden, dextran was the main colloid until 2000, when starches overtook the market. After the recent 6S-trial, it was suggested that dextran could be reinstituted, but concerns for greater coagulopathy, bleeding and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sigurjonsson, Johann, Hedman, David, Bansch, Peter, Schött, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0100-0
_version_ 1783353254374014976
author Sigurjonsson, Johann
Hedman, David
Bansch, Peter
Schött, Ulf
author_facet Sigurjonsson, Johann
Hedman, David
Bansch, Peter
Schött, Ulf
author_sort Sigurjonsson, Johann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starches have been withdrawn from the European market. In Sweden, dextran was the main colloid until 2000, when starches overtook the market. After the recent 6S-trial, it was suggested that dextran could be reinstituted, but concerns for greater coagulopathy, bleeding and anaphylaxis still remain. An experimental study from our department indicated that isovolemic substitution of dextran-70 did not derange the von Willebrand function more than albumin 5%, considering the fact that dextran is hyperoncotic in comparison to albumin 5% and, therefore, induces a greater plasma volume expansion and thereby a greater dilutional coagulopathy. METHODS: Eighteen patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery were assigned to receive either 5% albumin or 6% dextran-70 with 9 patients in each group. Standard coagulation tests, including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen and platelet count, viscoelastic coagulation test thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and the Multiplate platelet aggregation test were used to test for coagulation defects at different time points perioperatively. Blood loss, blood loss replacement data and haemodynamic parameters were retrieved from anaesthetic and postoperative charts. A local departmental fluid and transfusion/infusion protocol assured haemoglobin > 90 g/l and mean arterial pressure > 65 mmHg with Ringer’s acetate in addition to the colloid use. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic data between the groups. The tissue factor-activated (EXTEM) clot-structure parameter ROTEM A10 was decreased significantly in the dextran group as compared to the albumin group after the infusion of 500 ml of either colloid solution. The PT and aPTT were significantly prolonged, and the platelet count decreased postoperatively in the dextran group, whereas albumin only deranged fibrinogen levels as compared to preoperative levels. There were no differences in Multiplate platelet aggregometry, amount of haemorrhage or transfusion of blood components between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Standard plasma-based coagulation tests, platelet count and whole blood viscoelastic clot structure are affected by 6% dextran-70 to a greater extent than by 5% albumin, but platelet aggregation is not. Future studies should use more advanced haemodynamic monitoring to assess isovolemic plasma volume expansion with dextran and whether this affects haemostasis to a lesser degree.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6126009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61260092018-09-10 Comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery Sigurjonsson, Johann Hedman, David Bansch, Peter Schött, Ulf Perioper Med (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starches have been withdrawn from the European market. In Sweden, dextran was the main colloid until 2000, when starches overtook the market. After the recent 6S-trial, it was suggested that dextran could be reinstituted, but concerns for greater coagulopathy, bleeding and anaphylaxis still remain. An experimental study from our department indicated that isovolemic substitution of dextran-70 did not derange the von Willebrand function more than albumin 5%, considering the fact that dextran is hyperoncotic in comparison to albumin 5% and, therefore, induces a greater plasma volume expansion and thereby a greater dilutional coagulopathy. METHODS: Eighteen patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery were assigned to receive either 5% albumin or 6% dextran-70 with 9 patients in each group. Standard coagulation tests, including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen and platelet count, viscoelastic coagulation test thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and the Multiplate platelet aggregation test were used to test for coagulation defects at different time points perioperatively. Blood loss, blood loss replacement data and haemodynamic parameters were retrieved from anaesthetic and postoperative charts. A local departmental fluid and transfusion/infusion protocol assured haemoglobin > 90 g/l and mean arterial pressure > 65 mmHg with Ringer’s acetate in addition to the colloid use. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic data between the groups. The tissue factor-activated (EXTEM) clot-structure parameter ROTEM A10 was decreased significantly in the dextran group as compared to the albumin group after the infusion of 500 ml of either colloid solution. The PT and aPTT were significantly prolonged, and the platelet count decreased postoperatively in the dextran group, whereas albumin only deranged fibrinogen levels as compared to preoperative levels. There were no differences in Multiplate platelet aggregometry, amount of haemorrhage or transfusion of blood components between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Standard plasma-based coagulation tests, platelet count and whole blood viscoelastic clot structure are affected by 6% dextran-70 to a greater extent than by 5% albumin, but platelet aggregation is not. Future studies should use more advanced haemodynamic monitoring to assess isovolemic plasma volume expansion with dextran and whether this affects haemostasis to a lesser degree. BioMed Central 2018-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6126009/ /pubmed/30202516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0100-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sigurjonsson, Johann
Hedman, David
Bansch, Peter
Schött, Ulf
Comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery
title Comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery
title_full Comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery
title_short Comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery
title_sort comparison of dextran and albumin on blood coagulation in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0100-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sigurjonssonjohann comparisonofdextranandalbuminonbloodcoagulationinpatientsundergoingmajorgynaecologicalsurgery
AT hedmandavid comparisonofdextranandalbuminonbloodcoagulationinpatientsundergoingmajorgynaecologicalsurgery
AT banschpeter comparisonofdextranandalbuminonbloodcoagulationinpatientsundergoingmajorgynaecologicalsurgery
AT schottulf comparisonofdextranandalbuminonbloodcoagulationinpatientsundergoingmajorgynaecologicalsurgery