Cargando…
Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Sciatica is a common condition reported to affect over 3% of the UK population at any time and is often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID). Although the duration and severity of symptoms can vary, pain persisting beyond 6 weeks is unlikely to recover spontaneously and may re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5 |
_version_ | 1783353259893719040 |
---|---|
author | Wilby, Martin J. Hopkins, Carolyn Bedson, Emma Howlin, Sue Burnside, Girvan Conroy, Elizabeth J. Hughes, Dyfrig A. Sharma, Manohar Marson, Anthony Clark, Simon R. Williamson, Paula |
author_facet | Wilby, Martin J. Hopkins, Carolyn Bedson, Emma Howlin, Sue Burnside, Girvan Conroy, Elizabeth J. Hughes, Dyfrig A. Sharma, Manohar Marson, Anthony Clark, Simon R. Williamson, Paula |
author_sort | Wilby, Martin J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sciatica is a common condition reported to affect over 3% of the UK population at any time and is often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID). Although the duration and severity of symptoms can vary, pain persisting beyond 6 weeks is unlikely to recover spontaneously and may require investigation and treatment. Currently, there is no specific care pathway for sciatica in the National Health Service (NHS), and no direct comparison exists between surgical microdiscectomy and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The NERVES (NErve Root block VErsus Surgery) trial aims to address this by comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical microdiscectomy and TFESI to treat sciatica secondary to a PID. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 163 patients were recruited from NHS out-patient clinics across the UK and randomised to either microdiscectomy or TFESI. Adult patients (aged 16–65 years) with sciatic pain endured for between 6 weeks and 12 months are eligible if their symptoms have not been improved by at least one form of conservative (non-operative) treatment and they are willing to provide consent. Patients will be excluded if they present with neurological deficit or have had previous surgery at the same level. The primary outcome is patient-reported disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) score at 18 weeks post randomisation and secondary outcomes include disability and pain scales using numerical pain ratings, modified Roland-Morris and Core Outcome Measures Index at 12-weekly intervals, and patient satisfaction at 54 weeks. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life (QOL) will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5 L and self-report cost data at 12-weekly intervals and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Adverse event data will be collected. Analysis will follow the principle of intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION: NERVES is the first trial to evaluate the comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy to local anaesthetic and steroid administered via TFESI. The results of this research may facilitate the development of an evidence-based treatment strategy for patients with sciatica. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN04820368. Registered on 5 June 2014. EudraCT EudraCT2014–002751-25. Registered on 8 October 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6126032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61260322018-09-10 Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial Wilby, Martin J. Hopkins, Carolyn Bedson, Emma Howlin, Sue Burnside, Girvan Conroy, Elizabeth J. Hughes, Dyfrig A. Sharma, Manohar Marson, Anthony Clark, Simon R. Williamson, Paula Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Sciatica is a common condition reported to affect over 3% of the UK population at any time and is often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID). Although the duration and severity of symptoms can vary, pain persisting beyond 6 weeks is unlikely to recover spontaneously and may require investigation and treatment. Currently, there is no specific care pathway for sciatica in the National Health Service (NHS), and no direct comparison exists between surgical microdiscectomy and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The NERVES (NErve Root block VErsus Surgery) trial aims to address this by comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical microdiscectomy and TFESI to treat sciatica secondary to a PID. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 163 patients were recruited from NHS out-patient clinics across the UK and randomised to either microdiscectomy or TFESI. Adult patients (aged 16–65 years) with sciatic pain endured for between 6 weeks and 12 months are eligible if their symptoms have not been improved by at least one form of conservative (non-operative) treatment and they are willing to provide consent. Patients will be excluded if they present with neurological deficit or have had previous surgery at the same level. The primary outcome is patient-reported disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) score at 18 weeks post randomisation and secondary outcomes include disability and pain scales using numerical pain ratings, modified Roland-Morris and Core Outcome Measures Index at 12-weekly intervals, and patient satisfaction at 54 weeks. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life (QOL) will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5 L and self-report cost data at 12-weekly intervals and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Adverse event data will be collected. Analysis will follow the principle of intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION: NERVES is the first trial to evaluate the comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy to local anaesthetic and steroid administered via TFESI. The results of this research may facilitate the development of an evidence-based treatment strategy for patients with sciatica. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN04820368. Registered on 5 June 2014. EudraCT EudraCT2014–002751-25. Registered on 8 October 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6126032/ /pubmed/30185221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Wilby, Martin J. Hopkins, Carolyn Bedson, Emma Howlin, Sue Burnside, Girvan Conroy, Elizabeth J. Hughes, Dyfrig A. Sharma, Manohar Marson, Anthony Clark, Simon R. Williamson, Paula Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title | Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | nerve root block versus surgery (nerves) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilbymartinj nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hopkinscarolyn nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bedsonemma nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT howlinsue nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT burnsidegirvan nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT conroyelizabethj nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hughesdyfriga nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sharmamanohar nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marsonanthony nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT clarksimonr nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT williamsonpaula nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |