Cargando…

Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Sciatica is a common condition reported to affect over 3% of the UK population at any time and is often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID). Although the duration and severity of symptoms can vary, pain persisting beyond 6 weeks is unlikely to recover spontaneously and may re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilby, Martin J., Hopkins, Carolyn, Bedson, Emma, Howlin, Sue, Burnside, Girvan, Conroy, Elizabeth J., Hughes, Dyfrig A., Sharma, Manohar, Marson, Anthony, Clark, Simon R., Williamson, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5
_version_ 1783353259893719040
author Wilby, Martin J.
Hopkins, Carolyn
Bedson, Emma
Howlin, Sue
Burnside, Girvan
Conroy, Elizabeth J.
Hughes, Dyfrig A.
Sharma, Manohar
Marson, Anthony
Clark, Simon R.
Williamson, Paula
author_facet Wilby, Martin J.
Hopkins, Carolyn
Bedson, Emma
Howlin, Sue
Burnside, Girvan
Conroy, Elizabeth J.
Hughes, Dyfrig A.
Sharma, Manohar
Marson, Anthony
Clark, Simon R.
Williamson, Paula
author_sort Wilby, Martin J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sciatica is a common condition reported to affect over 3% of the UK population at any time and is often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID). Although the duration and severity of symptoms can vary, pain persisting beyond 6 weeks is unlikely to recover spontaneously and may require investigation and treatment. Currently, there is no specific care pathway for sciatica in the National Health Service (NHS), and no direct comparison exists between surgical microdiscectomy and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The NERVES (NErve Root block VErsus Surgery) trial aims to address this by comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical microdiscectomy and TFESI to treat sciatica secondary to a PID. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 163 patients were recruited from NHS out-patient clinics across the UK and randomised to either microdiscectomy or TFESI. Adult patients (aged 16–65 years) with sciatic pain endured for between 6 weeks and 12 months are eligible if their symptoms have not been improved by at least one form of conservative (non-operative) treatment and they are willing to provide consent. Patients will be excluded if they present with neurological deficit or have had previous surgery at the same level. The primary outcome is patient-reported disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) score at 18 weeks post randomisation and secondary outcomes include disability and pain scales using numerical pain ratings, modified Roland-Morris and Core Outcome Measures Index at 12-weekly intervals, and patient satisfaction at 54 weeks. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life (QOL) will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5 L and self-report cost data at 12-weekly intervals and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Adverse event data will be collected. Analysis will follow the principle of intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION: NERVES is the first trial to evaluate the comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy to local anaesthetic and steroid administered via TFESI. The results of this research may facilitate the development of an evidence-based treatment strategy for patients with sciatica. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN04820368. Registered on 5 June 2014. EudraCT EudraCT2014–002751-25. Registered on 8 October 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6126032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61260322018-09-10 Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial Wilby, Martin J. Hopkins, Carolyn Bedson, Emma Howlin, Sue Burnside, Girvan Conroy, Elizabeth J. Hughes, Dyfrig A. Sharma, Manohar Marson, Anthony Clark, Simon R. Williamson, Paula Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Sciatica is a common condition reported to affect over 3% of the UK population at any time and is often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID). Although the duration and severity of symptoms can vary, pain persisting beyond 6 weeks is unlikely to recover spontaneously and may require investigation and treatment. Currently, there is no specific care pathway for sciatica in the National Health Service (NHS), and no direct comparison exists between surgical microdiscectomy and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The NERVES (NErve Root block VErsus Surgery) trial aims to address this by comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical microdiscectomy and TFESI to treat sciatica secondary to a PID. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 163 patients were recruited from NHS out-patient clinics across the UK and randomised to either microdiscectomy or TFESI. Adult patients (aged 16–65 years) with sciatic pain endured for between 6 weeks and 12 months are eligible if their symptoms have not been improved by at least one form of conservative (non-operative) treatment and they are willing to provide consent. Patients will be excluded if they present with neurological deficit or have had previous surgery at the same level. The primary outcome is patient-reported disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) score at 18 weeks post randomisation and secondary outcomes include disability and pain scales using numerical pain ratings, modified Roland-Morris and Core Outcome Measures Index at 12-weekly intervals, and patient satisfaction at 54 weeks. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life (QOL) will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5 L and self-report cost data at 12-weekly intervals and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Adverse event data will be collected. Analysis will follow the principle of intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION: NERVES is the first trial to evaluate the comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy to local anaesthetic and steroid administered via TFESI. The results of this research may facilitate the development of an evidence-based treatment strategy for patients with sciatica. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN04820368. Registered on 5 June 2014. EudraCT EudraCT2014–002751-25. Registered on 8 October 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6126032/ /pubmed/30185221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wilby, Martin J.
Hopkins, Carolyn
Bedson, Emma
Howlin, Sue
Burnside, Girvan
Conroy, Elizabeth J.
Hughes, Dyfrig A.
Sharma, Manohar
Marson, Anthony
Clark, Simon R.
Williamson, Paula
Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_full Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_short Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_sort nerve root block versus surgery (nerves) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2677-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wilbymartinj nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hopkinscarolyn nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bedsonemma nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT howlinsue nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT burnsidegirvan nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT conroyelizabethj nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hughesdyfriga nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sharmamanohar nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marsonanthony nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarksimonr nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT williamsonpaula nerverootblockversussurgerynervesforthetreatmentofradicularpainsecondarytoaprolapsedintervertebraldischerniationstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial