Cargando…

Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar

BACKGROUND: Filgrastim and other granulocyte colony-stimulating factors are recommended to decrease febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence among patients with nonmyeloid cancers undergoing chemotherapy. Data comparing biosimilar filgrastim-sndz with reference filgrastim (filgrastim-ref) are limited outs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwartzberg, Lee S, Lal, Lincy S, Balu, Sanjeev, Campbell, Kim, Brekke, Lee, Elliott, Caitlin, Korrer, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214262
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S168298
_version_ 1783353340941303808
author Schwartzberg, Lee S
Lal, Lincy S
Balu, Sanjeev
Campbell, Kim
Brekke, Lee
Elliott, Caitlin
Korrer, Stephanie
author_facet Schwartzberg, Lee S
Lal, Lincy S
Balu, Sanjeev
Campbell, Kim
Brekke, Lee
Elliott, Caitlin
Korrer, Stephanie
author_sort Schwartzberg, Lee S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Filgrastim and other granulocyte colony-stimulating factors are recommended to decrease febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence among patients with nonmyeloid cancers undergoing chemotherapy. Data comparing biosimilar filgrastim-sndz with reference filgrastim (filgrastim-ref) are limited outside of clinical trials in the US. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of FN across chemotherapy cycles 1–6 between patients treated with filgrastim-sndz vs filgrastim-ref. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective claims analysis of patients with nonmyeloid cancer enrolled in commercial or Medicare Advantage plans from March 2015 to June 2016 and receiving filgrastim-sndz or filgrastim-ref during ≥1 completed chemotherapy cycle. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, pregnant patients, and those with missing data were excluded. FN was identified using the diagnosis codes for neutropenia + fever, neutropenia + bacterial/fungal infection, and neutropenia + infection + fever. Equivalence testing for FN incidence at the cycle level across chemotherapy cycles 1–6 was conducted for filgrastim-sndz vs filgrastim-ref after adjusting for baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results were considered equivalent if the 90% CIs for between-cohort differences were within ±6.0%. RESULTS: The analysis included 3,459 patients (162 filgrastim-sndz and 3,297 filgrastim-ref). Before weighting, the filgrastim-sndz cohort was younger than filgrastim-ref and had a higher proportion of men, a higher proportion with commercial insurance, and lower proportions with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis or metastatic cancer. After weighting, baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts. Adjusted FN incidence was equivalent for filgrastim-sndz vs filgrastim-ref, respectively: neutropenia + fever, 0.81% vs 0.61% (difference [90% CI]=0.20 [−0.57 to 1.56]); neutropenia + infection, 1.21% vs 1.33% (difference [90% CI]=−0.12 [−1.17 to 2.28]); neutropenia + infection + fever, 0.0% vs 0.14% (difference=−0.14; CI not calculated because filgrastim-sndz had 0 events). CONCLUSION: Filgrastim-sndz and filgrastim-ref are statistically equivalent for preventing FN across chemotherapy cycles 1–6 among patients with nonmyeloid cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6126503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61265032018-09-13 Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar Schwartzberg, Lee S Lal, Lincy S Balu, Sanjeev Campbell, Kim Brekke, Lee Elliott, Caitlin Korrer, Stephanie Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Filgrastim and other granulocyte colony-stimulating factors are recommended to decrease febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence among patients with nonmyeloid cancers undergoing chemotherapy. Data comparing biosimilar filgrastim-sndz with reference filgrastim (filgrastim-ref) are limited outside of clinical trials in the US. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of FN across chemotherapy cycles 1–6 between patients treated with filgrastim-sndz vs filgrastim-ref. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective claims analysis of patients with nonmyeloid cancer enrolled in commercial or Medicare Advantage plans from March 2015 to June 2016 and receiving filgrastim-sndz or filgrastim-ref during ≥1 completed chemotherapy cycle. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, pregnant patients, and those with missing data were excluded. FN was identified using the diagnosis codes for neutropenia + fever, neutropenia + bacterial/fungal infection, and neutropenia + infection + fever. Equivalence testing for FN incidence at the cycle level across chemotherapy cycles 1–6 was conducted for filgrastim-sndz vs filgrastim-ref after adjusting for baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results were considered equivalent if the 90% CIs for between-cohort differences were within ±6.0%. RESULTS: The analysis included 3,459 patients (162 filgrastim-sndz and 3,297 filgrastim-ref). Before weighting, the filgrastim-sndz cohort was younger than filgrastim-ref and had a higher proportion of men, a higher proportion with commercial insurance, and lower proportions with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis or metastatic cancer. After weighting, baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts. Adjusted FN incidence was equivalent for filgrastim-sndz vs filgrastim-ref, respectively: neutropenia + fever, 0.81% vs 0.61% (difference [90% CI]=0.20 [−0.57 to 1.56]); neutropenia + infection, 1.21% vs 1.33% (difference [90% CI]=−0.12 [−1.17 to 2.28]); neutropenia + infection + fever, 0.0% vs 0.14% (difference=−0.14; CI not calculated because filgrastim-sndz had 0 events). CONCLUSION: Filgrastim-sndz and filgrastim-ref are statistically equivalent for preventing FN across chemotherapy cycles 1–6 among patients with nonmyeloid cancer. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6126503/ /pubmed/30214262 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S168298 Text en © 2018 Schwartzberg et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schwartzberg, Lee S
Lal, Lincy S
Balu, Sanjeev
Campbell, Kim
Brekke, Lee
Elliott, Caitlin
Korrer, Stephanie
Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar
title Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar
title_full Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar
title_fullStr Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar
title_short Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar
title_sort incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214262
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S168298
work_keys_str_mv AT schwartzberglees incidenceoffebrileneutropeniaduringchemotherapyamongpatientswithnonmyeloidcancerreceivingfilgrastimvsafilgrastimbiosimilar
AT lallincys incidenceoffebrileneutropeniaduringchemotherapyamongpatientswithnonmyeloidcancerreceivingfilgrastimvsafilgrastimbiosimilar
AT balusanjeev incidenceoffebrileneutropeniaduringchemotherapyamongpatientswithnonmyeloidcancerreceivingfilgrastimvsafilgrastimbiosimilar
AT campbellkim incidenceoffebrileneutropeniaduringchemotherapyamongpatientswithnonmyeloidcancerreceivingfilgrastimvsafilgrastimbiosimilar
AT brekkelee incidenceoffebrileneutropeniaduringchemotherapyamongpatientswithnonmyeloidcancerreceivingfilgrastimvsafilgrastimbiosimilar
AT elliottcaitlin incidenceoffebrileneutropeniaduringchemotherapyamongpatientswithnonmyeloidcancerreceivingfilgrastimvsafilgrastimbiosimilar
AT korrerstephanie incidenceoffebrileneutropeniaduringchemotherapyamongpatientswithnonmyeloidcancerreceivingfilgrastimvsafilgrastimbiosimilar