Cargando…
Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this literature review was to examine the existing patient-reported outcome measurement literature to understand the empirical evidence supporting response scale selection in pain measurement for the adult population. METHODS: The search strategy involved a comprehensive,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30238085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0053-6 |
_version_ | 1783353402180239360 |
---|---|
author | Safikhani, Shima Gries, Katharine S. Trudeau, Jeremiah J. Reasner, David Rüdell, Katja Coons, Stephen Joel Bush, Elizabeth Nicole Hanlon, Jennifer Abraham, Lucy Vernon, Margaret |
author_facet | Safikhani, Shima Gries, Katharine S. Trudeau, Jeremiah J. Reasner, David Rüdell, Katja Coons, Stephen Joel Bush, Elizabeth Nicole Hanlon, Jennifer Abraham, Lucy Vernon, Margaret |
author_sort | Safikhani, Shima |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this literature review was to examine the existing patient-reported outcome measurement literature to understand the empirical evidence supporting response scale selection in pain measurement for the adult population. METHODS: The search strategy involved a comprehensive, structured, literature review with multiple search objectives and search terms. RESULTS: The searched yielded 6918 abstracts which were reviewed against study criteria for eligibility across the adult pain objective. The review included 42 review articles, consensus guidelines, expert opinion pieces, and primary research articles providing insights into optimal response scale selection for pain assessment in the adult population. Based on the extensive and varied literature on pain assessments, the adult pain studies typically use simple response scales with single-item measures of pain—a numeric rating scale, visual analog scale, or verbal rating scale. Across 42 review articles, consensus guidelines, expert opinion pieces, and primary research articles, the NRS response scale was most often recommended in these guidance documents. When reviewing the empirical basis for these recommendations, we found that the NRS had slightly superior measurement properties (e.g., reliability, validity, responsiveness) across a wide variety of contexts of use as compared to other response scales. CONCLUSIONS: Both empirical studies and review articles provide evidence that the 11-point NRS is likely the optimal response scale to evaluate pain among adult patients without cognitive impairment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6127068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61270682018-09-18 Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review Safikhani, Shima Gries, Katharine S. Trudeau, Jeremiah J. Reasner, David Rüdell, Katja Coons, Stephen Joel Bush, Elizabeth Nicole Hanlon, Jennifer Abraham, Lucy Vernon, Margaret J Patient Rep Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: The purpose of this literature review was to examine the existing patient-reported outcome measurement literature to understand the empirical evidence supporting response scale selection in pain measurement for the adult population. METHODS: The search strategy involved a comprehensive, structured, literature review with multiple search objectives and search terms. RESULTS: The searched yielded 6918 abstracts which were reviewed against study criteria for eligibility across the adult pain objective. The review included 42 review articles, consensus guidelines, expert opinion pieces, and primary research articles providing insights into optimal response scale selection for pain assessment in the adult population. Based on the extensive and varied literature on pain assessments, the adult pain studies typically use simple response scales with single-item measures of pain—a numeric rating scale, visual analog scale, or verbal rating scale. Across 42 review articles, consensus guidelines, expert opinion pieces, and primary research articles, the NRS response scale was most often recommended in these guidance documents. When reviewing the empirical basis for these recommendations, we found that the NRS had slightly superior measurement properties (e.g., reliability, validity, responsiveness) across a wide variety of contexts of use as compared to other response scales. CONCLUSIONS: Both empirical studies and review articles provide evidence that the 11-point NRS is likely the optimal response scale to evaluate pain among adult patients without cognitive impairment. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6127068/ /pubmed/30238085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0053-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Safikhani, Shima Gries, Katharine S. Trudeau, Jeremiah J. Reasner, David Rüdell, Katja Coons, Stephen Joel Bush, Elizabeth Nicole Hanlon, Jennifer Abraham, Lucy Vernon, Margaret Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review |
title | Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review |
title_full | Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review |
title_fullStr | Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review |
title_short | Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review |
title_sort | response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30238085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0053-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safikhanishima responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview AT grieskatharines responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview AT trudeaujeremiahj responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview AT reasnerdavid responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview AT rudellkatja responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview AT coonsstephenjoel responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview AT bushelizabethnicole responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview AT hanlonjennifer responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview AT abrahamlucy responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview AT vernonmargaret responsescaleselectioninadultpainmeasuresresultsfromaliteraturereview |