Cargando…

A mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk

The majority of existing models for predicting disease risk in response to climate change are empirical. These models exploit correlations between historical data, rather than explicitly describing relationships between cause and response variables. Therefore, they are unsuitable for capturing impac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beltrame, Ludovica, Dunne, Toby, Vineer, Hannah Rose, Walker, Josephine G., Morgan, Eric R., Vickerman, Peter, McCann, Catherine M., Williams, Diana J. L., Wagener, Thorsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0072
_version_ 1783353421837893632
author Beltrame, Ludovica
Dunne, Toby
Vineer, Hannah Rose
Walker, Josephine G.
Morgan, Eric R.
Vickerman, Peter
McCann, Catherine M.
Williams, Diana J. L.
Wagener, Thorsten
author_facet Beltrame, Ludovica
Dunne, Toby
Vineer, Hannah Rose
Walker, Josephine G.
Morgan, Eric R.
Vickerman, Peter
McCann, Catherine M.
Williams, Diana J. L.
Wagener, Thorsten
author_sort Beltrame, Ludovica
collection PubMed
description The majority of existing models for predicting disease risk in response to climate change are empirical. These models exploit correlations between historical data, rather than explicitly describing relationships between cause and response variables. Therefore, they are unsuitable for capturing impacts beyond historically observed variability and have limited ability to guide interventions. In this study, we integrate environmental and epidemiological processes into a new mechanistic model, taking the widespread parasitic disease of fasciolosis as an example. The model simulates environmental suitability for disease transmission at a daily time step and 25 m resolution, explicitly linking the parasite life cycle to key weather–water–environment conditions. Using epidemiological data, we show that the model can reproduce observed infection levels in time and space for two case studies in the UK. To overcome data limitations, we propose a calibration approach combining Monte Carlo sampling and expert opinion, which allows constraint of the model in a process-based way, including a quantification of uncertainty. The simulated disease dynamics agree with information from the literature, and comparison with a widely used empirical risk index shows that the new model provides better insight into the time–space patterns of infection, which will be valuable for decision support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6127180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61271802018-09-07 A mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk Beltrame, Ludovica Dunne, Toby Vineer, Hannah Rose Walker, Josephine G. Morgan, Eric R. Vickerman, Peter McCann, Catherine M. Williams, Diana J. L. Wagener, Thorsten J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Earth Science interface The majority of existing models for predicting disease risk in response to climate change are empirical. These models exploit correlations between historical data, rather than explicitly describing relationships between cause and response variables. Therefore, they are unsuitable for capturing impacts beyond historically observed variability and have limited ability to guide interventions. In this study, we integrate environmental and epidemiological processes into a new mechanistic model, taking the widespread parasitic disease of fasciolosis as an example. The model simulates environmental suitability for disease transmission at a daily time step and 25 m resolution, explicitly linking the parasite life cycle to key weather–water–environment conditions. Using epidemiological data, we show that the model can reproduce observed infection levels in time and space for two case studies in the UK. To overcome data limitations, we propose a calibration approach combining Monte Carlo sampling and expert opinion, which allows constraint of the model in a process-based way, including a quantification of uncertainty. The simulated disease dynamics agree with information from the literature, and comparison with a widely used empirical risk index shows that the new model provides better insight into the time–space patterns of infection, which will be valuable for decision support. The Royal Society 2018-08 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6127180/ /pubmed/30158179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0072 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Life Sciences–Earth Science interface
Beltrame, Ludovica
Dunne, Toby
Vineer, Hannah Rose
Walker, Josephine G.
Morgan, Eric R.
Vickerman, Peter
McCann, Catherine M.
Williams, Diana J. L.
Wagener, Thorsten
A mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk
title A mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk
title_full A mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk
title_fullStr A mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk
title_full_unstemmed A mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk
title_short A mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk
title_sort mechanistic hydro-epidemiological model of liver fluke risk
topic Life Sciences–Earth Science interface
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0072
work_keys_str_mv AT beltrameludovica amechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT dunnetoby amechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT vineerhannahrose amechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT walkerjosephineg amechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT morganericr amechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT vickermanpeter amechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT mccanncatherinem amechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT williamsdianajl amechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT wagenerthorsten amechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT beltrameludovica mechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT dunnetoby mechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT vineerhannahrose mechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT walkerjosephineg mechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT morganericr mechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT vickermanpeter mechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT mccanncatherinem mechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT williamsdianajl mechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk
AT wagenerthorsten mechanistichydroepidemiologicalmodelofliverflukerisk