Cargando…

Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint?

Background: The effects of recombinant interleukin-1β (rIL-1β) have been described for the middle carpal joint (MCJ). However, we are unaware of any studies that have described the cytological response of the tibiotarsal joint (TTJ) to rIL-1β or compared the clinical and cytological responses of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colbath, Aimee C., Dow, Steven W., Hopkins, Leone S., Phillips, Jennifer N., McIlwraith, C. Wayne, Goodrich, Laurie R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30234134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00208
_version_ 1783353441069826048
author Colbath, Aimee C.
Dow, Steven W.
Hopkins, Leone S.
Phillips, Jennifer N.
McIlwraith, C. Wayne
Goodrich, Laurie R.
author_facet Colbath, Aimee C.
Dow, Steven W.
Hopkins, Leone S.
Phillips, Jennifer N.
McIlwraith, C. Wayne
Goodrich, Laurie R.
author_sort Colbath, Aimee C.
collection PubMed
description Background: The effects of recombinant interleukin-1β (rIL-1β) have been described for the middle carpal joint (MCJ). However, we are unaware of any studies that have described the cytological response of the tibiotarsal joint (TTJ) to rIL-1β or compared the clinical and cytological responses of the MCJ to the TTJ following the administration of intra-articular rIL-1β. Such information is critical for researchers planning to use rIL-1β to create acute synovitis models in horses. Objectives: To compare the clinical and cytological responses of the MCJ to the TTJ following administration of intra-articular rIL-1β. Methods: Twelve horses were used for the study. Eight horses received 75 ng of rIL-1β into the MCJ and four horses received 75 ng of rIL-1β into the TTJ. Clinical and cytological outcome parameters including lameness, joint circumference, joint effusion score, total nucleated cell count, cellular differentials, C-reactive protein, and prostaglandin-E2 concentrations were determined at baseline and multiple post-treatment time points over a 336 h period (2 weeks). Results: Recombinant IL-1β administered into the TTJ resulted in a significantly greater respiratory rate at 24 h and heart rate at 12 h when compared to rIL-1β administered into the MCJ. In addition, the TTJ had a significantly greater increase in joint circumference at 24 post-injection hour (PIH) and subjective effusion grade at 24 PIH and 336 PIH. The MCJ had significantly higher total protein concentration at 6 PIH, and a significantly higher NCC at 24 and 72 PIH when compared to the TTJ. Conversely, the TTJ had significantly higher neutrophilic infiltration than the MCJ at 6 PIH and 168 PIH. Conclusions: This study establishes that the same intra-articular dose of rIL-1 β elicits significantly different clinical and cytological responses in the MCJ compared to the TTJ in the equine model of intra-articular synovitis. In addition, clinical and cytological evidence of synovitis may persist up to or >1 week following intra-articular administration of rIL-1 β.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6127273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61272732018-09-19 Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint? Colbath, Aimee C. Dow, Steven W. Hopkins, Leone S. Phillips, Jennifer N. McIlwraith, C. Wayne Goodrich, Laurie R. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Background: The effects of recombinant interleukin-1β (rIL-1β) have been described for the middle carpal joint (MCJ). However, we are unaware of any studies that have described the cytological response of the tibiotarsal joint (TTJ) to rIL-1β or compared the clinical and cytological responses of the MCJ to the TTJ following the administration of intra-articular rIL-1β. Such information is critical for researchers planning to use rIL-1β to create acute synovitis models in horses. Objectives: To compare the clinical and cytological responses of the MCJ to the TTJ following administration of intra-articular rIL-1β. Methods: Twelve horses were used for the study. Eight horses received 75 ng of rIL-1β into the MCJ and four horses received 75 ng of rIL-1β into the TTJ. Clinical and cytological outcome parameters including lameness, joint circumference, joint effusion score, total nucleated cell count, cellular differentials, C-reactive protein, and prostaglandin-E2 concentrations were determined at baseline and multiple post-treatment time points over a 336 h period (2 weeks). Results: Recombinant IL-1β administered into the TTJ resulted in a significantly greater respiratory rate at 24 h and heart rate at 12 h when compared to rIL-1β administered into the MCJ. In addition, the TTJ had a significantly greater increase in joint circumference at 24 post-injection hour (PIH) and subjective effusion grade at 24 PIH and 336 PIH. The MCJ had significantly higher total protein concentration at 6 PIH, and a significantly higher NCC at 24 and 72 PIH when compared to the TTJ. Conversely, the TTJ had significantly higher neutrophilic infiltration than the MCJ at 6 PIH and 168 PIH. Conclusions: This study establishes that the same intra-articular dose of rIL-1 β elicits significantly different clinical and cytological responses in the MCJ compared to the TTJ in the equine model of intra-articular synovitis. In addition, clinical and cytological evidence of synovitis may persist up to or >1 week following intra-articular administration of rIL-1 β. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6127273/ /pubmed/30234134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00208 Text en Copyright © 2018 Colbath, Dow, Hopkins, Phillips, McIlwraith and Goodrich. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Colbath, Aimee C.
Dow, Steven W.
Hopkins, Leone S.
Phillips, Jennifer N.
McIlwraith, C. Wayne
Goodrich, Laurie R.
Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint?
title Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint?
title_full Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint?
title_fullStr Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint?
title_full_unstemmed Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint?
title_short Induction of Synovitis Using Interleukin-1 Beta: Are There Differences in the Response of Middle Carpal Joint Compared to the Tibiotarsal Joint?
title_sort induction of synovitis using interleukin-1 beta: are there differences in the response of middle carpal joint compared to the tibiotarsal joint?
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30234134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00208
work_keys_str_mv AT colbathaimeec inductionofsynovitisusinginterleukin1betaaretheredifferencesintheresponseofmiddlecarpaljointcomparedtothetibiotarsaljoint
AT dowstevenw inductionofsynovitisusinginterleukin1betaaretheredifferencesintheresponseofmiddlecarpaljointcomparedtothetibiotarsaljoint
AT hopkinsleones inductionofsynovitisusinginterleukin1betaaretheredifferencesintheresponseofmiddlecarpaljointcomparedtothetibiotarsaljoint
AT phillipsjennifern inductionofsynovitisusinginterleukin1betaaretheredifferencesintheresponseofmiddlecarpaljointcomparedtothetibiotarsaljoint
AT mcilwraithcwayne inductionofsynovitisusinginterleukin1betaaretheredifferencesintheresponseofmiddlecarpaljointcomparedtothetibiotarsaljoint
AT goodrichlaurier inductionofsynovitisusinginterleukin1betaaretheredifferencesintheresponseofmiddlecarpaljointcomparedtothetibiotarsaljoint