Cargando…

Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the correlation between horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance using Caliper and Orbscan IIz with the ciliary sulcus diameter measured by high frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and presents an adjustment formula to improve the correlation. METHODS: We measured...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashemian, Seyed Javad, Mohebbi, Majid, Yaseri, Mehdi, Jafari, Mohammad Ebrahim, Nabili, Shadrokh, Hashemian, Seyed Mahyar, Hashemian, Mahsa Sadat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.11.011
_version_ 1783353460930904064
author Hashemian, Seyed Javad
Mohebbi, Majid
Yaseri, Mehdi
Jafari, Mohammad Ebrahim
Nabili, Shadrokh
Hashemian, Seyed Mahyar
Hashemian, Mahsa Sadat
author_facet Hashemian, Seyed Javad
Mohebbi, Majid
Yaseri, Mehdi
Jafari, Mohammad Ebrahim
Nabili, Shadrokh
Hashemian, Seyed Mahyar
Hashemian, Mahsa Sadat
author_sort Hashemian, Seyed Javad
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluates the correlation between horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance using Caliper and Orbscan IIz with the ciliary sulcus diameter measured by high frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and presents an adjustment formula to improve the correlation. METHODS: We measured horizontal sulcus-to-sulcus (STS) dimension of 273 right eyes of 273 high myopic patients with 35 MHz UBM and horizontal WTW using Orbscan IIz and Caliper. Mean WTW diameter, differences, and the correlation of measurement methods were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent was −8.79 ± 4.87 diopters. Mean horizontal STS dimension with UBM was 12.13 ± 0.45 mm (range, 10.81–13.42 mm). Mean WTW diameter in the Caliper method was 11.70 ± 0.40 mm (range, 10.6–12.8 mm) and 11.70 ± 0.40 mm (range, 10.5–13.1 mm) in the Orbscan method. Mean difference of UBM STS and WTW with Caliper was 0.48 ± 0.28 mm (range, −0.19 to 1.37 mm). Mean difference of UBM STS diameter and Orbscan WTW was 0.38 ± 0.31 mm (range, −0.64 to 1.29 mm). The Pearson correlations of WTW diameter measured by Caliper and Orbscan with UBM's STS diameter were 0.778 and 0.773, respectively. This difference diminished after adjustment. The 95% limit of agreement was almost the same in Caliper and Orbscan (−0.07 to 1.03 compared with −0.23 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in measurements between STS diameter using UBM and WTW diameter utilizing Caliper and Orbscan. This difference diminished after our recommended adjustment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6127356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61273562018-09-07 Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy Hashemian, Seyed Javad Mohebbi, Majid Yaseri, Mehdi Jafari, Mohammad Ebrahim Nabili, Shadrokh Hashemian, Seyed Mahyar Hashemian, Mahsa Sadat J Curr Ophthalmol Article PURPOSE: This study evaluates the correlation between horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance using Caliper and Orbscan IIz with the ciliary sulcus diameter measured by high frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and presents an adjustment formula to improve the correlation. METHODS: We measured horizontal sulcus-to-sulcus (STS) dimension of 273 right eyes of 273 high myopic patients with 35 MHz UBM and horizontal WTW using Orbscan IIz and Caliper. Mean WTW diameter, differences, and the correlation of measurement methods were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent was −8.79 ± 4.87 diopters. Mean horizontal STS dimension with UBM was 12.13 ± 0.45 mm (range, 10.81–13.42 mm). Mean WTW diameter in the Caliper method was 11.70 ± 0.40 mm (range, 10.6–12.8 mm) and 11.70 ± 0.40 mm (range, 10.5–13.1 mm) in the Orbscan method. Mean difference of UBM STS and WTW with Caliper was 0.48 ± 0.28 mm (range, −0.19 to 1.37 mm). Mean difference of UBM STS diameter and Orbscan WTW was 0.38 ± 0.31 mm (range, −0.64 to 1.29 mm). The Pearson correlations of WTW diameter measured by Caliper and Orbscan with UBM's STS diameter were 0.778 and 0.773, respectively. This difference diminished after adjustment. The 95% limit of agreement was almost the same in Caliper and Orbscan (−0.07 to 1.03 compared with −0.23 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in measurements between STS diameter using UBM and WTW diameter utilizing Caliper and Orbscan. This difference diminished after our recommended adjustment. Elsevier 2017-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6127356/ /pubmed/30197950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.11.011 Text en © 2017 Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hashemian, Seyed Javad
Mohebbi, Majid
Yaseri, Mehdi
Jafari, Mohammad Ebrahim
Nabili, Shadrokh
Hashemian, Seyed Mahyar
Hashemian, Mahsa Sadat
Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy
title Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy
title_full Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy
title_fullStr Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy
title_short Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy
title_sort adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.11.011
work_keys_str_mv AT hashemianseyedjavad adjustmentformulaetoimprovethecorrelationofwhitetowhitemeasurementwithdirectmeasurementoftheciliarysulcusdiameterbyultrasoundbiomicroscopy
AT mohebbimajid adjustmentformulaetoimprovethecorrelationofwhitetowhitemeasurementwithdirectmeasurementoftheciliarysulcusdiameterbyultrasoundbiomicroscopy
AT yaserimehdi adjustmentformulaetoimprovethecorrelationofwhitetowhitemeasurementwithdirectmeasurementoftheciliarysulcusdiameterbyultrasoundbiomicroscopy
AT jafarimohammadebrahim adjustmentformulaetoimprovethecorrelationofwhitetowhitemeasurementwithdirectmeasurementoftheciliarysulcusdiameterbyultrasoundbiomicroscopy
AT nabilishadrokh adjustmentformulaetoimprovethecorrelationofwhitetowhitemeasurementwithdirectmeasurementoftheciliarysulcusdiameterbyultrasoundbiomicroscopy
AT hashemianseyedmahyar adjustmentformulaetoimprovethecorrelationofwhitetowhitemeasurementwithdirectmeasurementoftheciliarysulcusdiameterbyultrasoundbiomicroscopy
AT hashemianmahsasadat adjustmentformulaetoimprovethecorrelationofwhitetowhitemeasurementwithdirectmeasurementoftheciliarysulcusdiameterbyultrasoundbiomicroscopy