Cargando…
A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of peri-implantation prednisolone use and its duration in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles of patients with good prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infertile patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protoco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.12244 |
_version_ | 1783353484670664704 |
---|---|
author | Özmen, Batuhan Pabuçcu, Emre Göksan Şükür, Yavuz Emre Ulubaşoğlu, Hasan Ateş, Can Sönmezer, Murat Berker, Bülent Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer |
author_facet | Özmen, Batuhan Pabuçcu, Emre Göksan Şükür, Yavuz Emre Ulubaşoğlu, Hasan Ateş, Can Sönmezer, Murat Berker, Bülent Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer |
author_sort | Özmen, Batuhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of peri-implantation prednisolone use and its duration in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles of patients with good prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infertile patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol between January 2010 and June 2013 were included. The patients in group A (n=196) received no prednisolone. The patients in groups B (n=397) and C (n=371) received 5 mg oral prednisolone daily, for 4 and 12 days following embryo transfer, respectively. The main outcome parameter was live birth rate. RESULTS: The ages of the groups were 30.1±4.6, 31.5±4.5, and 30.9±4.7 years, respectively (p=0.163). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding cycle characteristics. Implantation rates were 20.7%, 24.6%, and 23.8%, respectively (p=0.163). Miscarriage rates were 1.5%, 3.5%, and 3.2%, respectively (p=0.859). Live birth rates were 28.7%, 29.3%, and 32.8%, respectively (p=0.482). CONCLUSION: Empiric prednisolone administration during the peri-implantation period does not seem to have beneficial effects in ART cycles of patients with good prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6127480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61274802018-09-10 A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis Özmen, Batuhan Pabuçcu, Emre Göksan Şükür, Yavuz Emre Ulubaşoğlu, Hasan Ateş, Can Sönmezer, Murat Berker, Bülent Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of peri-implantation prednisolone use and its duration in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles of patients with good prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infertile patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol between January 2010 and June 2013 were included. The patients in group A (n=196) received no prednisolone. The patients in groups B (n=397) and C (n=371) received 5 mg oral prednisolone daily, for 4 and 12 days following embryo transfer, respectively. The main outcome parameter was live birth rate. RESULTS: The ages of the groups were 30.1±4.6, 31.5±4.5, and 30.9±4.7 years, respectively (p=0.163). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding cycle characteristics. Implantation rates were 20.7%, 24.6%, and 23.8%, respectively (p=0.163). Miscarriage rates were 1.5%, 3.5%, and 3.2%, respectively (p=0.859). Live birth rates were 28.7%, 29.3%, and 32.8%, respectively (p=0.482). CONCLUSION: Empiric prednisolone administration during the peri-implantation period does not seem to have beneficial effects in ART cycles of patients with good prognosis. Galenos Publishing 2018-09 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6127480/ /pubmed/30202623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.12244 Text en ©Copyright 2018 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Özmen, Batuhan Pabuçcu, Emre Göksan Şükür, Yavuz Emre Ulubaşoğlu, Hasan Ateş, Can Sönmezer, Murat Berker, Bülent Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis |
title | A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis |
title_full | A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis |
title_fullStr | A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis |
title_short | A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis |
title_sort | retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.12244 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozmenbatuhan aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT pabuccuemregoksan aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT sukuryavuzemre aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT ulubasogluhasan aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT atescan aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT sonmezermurat aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT berkerbulent aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT atabekoglucemsomer aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT ozmenbatuhan retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT pabuccuemregoksan retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT sukuryavuzemre retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT ulubasogluhasan retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT atescan retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT sonmezermurat retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT berkerbulent retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis AT atabekoglucemsomer retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis |