Cargando…

A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of peri-implantation prednisolone use and its duration in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles of patients with good prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infertile patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protoco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Özmen, Batuhan, Pabuçcu, Emre Göksan, Şükür, Yavuz Emre, Ulubaşoğlu, Hasan, Ateş, Can, Sönmezer, Murat, Berker, Bülent, Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.12244
_version_ 1783353484670664704
author Özmen, Batuhan
Pabuçcu, Emre Göksan
Şükür, Yavuz Emre
Ulubaşoğlu, Hasan
Ateş, Can
Sönmezer, Murat
Berker, Bülent
Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer
author_facet Özmen, Batuhan
Pabuçcu, Emre Göksan
Şükür, Yavuz Emre
Ulubaşoğlu, Hasan
Ateş, Can
Sönmezer, Murat
Berker, Bülent
Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer
author_sort Özmen, Batuhan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of peri-implantation prednisolone use and its duration in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles of patients with good prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infertile patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol between January 2010 and June 2013 were included. The patients in group A (n=196) received no prednisolone. The patients in groups B (n=397) and C (n=371) received 5 mg oral prednisolone daily, for 4 and 12 days following embryo transfer, respectively. The main outcome parameter was live birth rate. RESULTS: The ages of the groups were 30.1±4.6, 31.5±4.5, and 30.9±4.7 years, respectively (p=0.163). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding cycle characteristics. Implantation rates were 20.7%, 24.6%, and 23.8%, respectively (p=0.163). Miscarriage rates were 1.5%, 3.5%, and 3.2%, respectively (p=0.859). Live birth rates were 28.7%, 29.3%, and 32.8%, respectively (p=0.482). CONCLUSION: Empiric prednisolone administration during the peri-implantation period does not seem to have beneficial effects in ART cycles of patients with good prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6127480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61274802018-09-10 A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis Özmen, Batuhan Pabuçcu, Emre Göksan Şükür, Yavuz Emre Ulubaşoğlu, Hasan Ateş, Can Sönmezer, Murat Berker, Bülent Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of peri-implantation prednisolone use and its duration in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles of patients with good prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infertile patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol between January 2010 and June 2013 were included. The patients in group A (n=196) received no prednisolone. The patients in groups B (n=397) and C (n=371) received 5 mg oral prednisolone daily, for 4 and 12 days following embryo transfer, respectively. The main outcome parameter was live birth rate. RESULTS: The ages of the groups were 30.1±4.6, 31.5±4.5, and 30.9±4.7 years, respectively (p=0.163). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding cycle characteristics. Implantation rates were 20.7%, 24.6%, and 23.8%, respectively (p=0.163). Miscarriage rates were 1.5%, 3.5%, and 3.2%, respectively (p=0.859). Live birth rates were 28.7%, 29.3%, and 32.8%, respectively (p=0.482). CONCLUSION: Empiric prednisolone administration during the peri-implantation period does not seem to have beneficial effects in ART cycles of patients with good prognosis. Galenos Publishing 2018-09 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6127480/ /pubmed/30202623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.12244 Text en ©Copyright 2018 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Özmen, Batuhan
Pabuçcu, Emre Göksan
Şükür, Yavuz Emre
Ulubaşoğlu, Hasan
Ateş, Can
Sönmezer, Murat
Berker, Bülent
Atabekoğlu, Cem Somer
A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis
title A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis
title_full A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis
title_fullStr A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis
title_short A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis
title_sort retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.12244
work_keys_str_mv AT ozmenbatuhan aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT pabuccuemregoksan aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT sukuryavuzemre aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT ulubasogluhasan aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT atescan aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT sonmezermurat aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT berkerbulent aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT atabekoglucemsomer aretrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT ozmenbatuhan retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT pabuccuemregoksan retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT sukuryavuzemre retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT ulubasogluhasan retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT atescan retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT sonmezermurat retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT berkerbulent retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis
AT atabekoglucemsomer retrospectivecomparativestudyofprednisoloneuseinantagonistcotreatedassistedreproductivetechnologycyclesforpatientswithgoodprognosis