Cargando…

Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE: We explore whether a knowledge–discovery approach building a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) prediction model for weight loss (WL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) is feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: HNC patients from 2007 to 2015 were i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Zhi, Nakatsugawa, Minoru, Hu, Chen, Robertson, Scott P., Hui, Xuan, Moore, Joseph A., Bowers, Michael R., Kiess, Ana P., Page, Brandi R., Burns, Laura, Muse, Mariah, Choflet, Amanda, Sakaue, Kousuke, Sugiyama, Shinya, Utsunomiya, Kazuki, Wong, John W., McNutt, Todd R., Quon, Harry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.11.006
_version_ 1783353547445764096
author Cheng, Zhi
Nakatsugawa, Minoru
Hu, Chen
Robertson, Scott P.
Hui, Xuan
Moore, Joseph A.
Bowers, Michael R.
Kiess, Ana P.
Page, Brandi R.
Burns, Laura
Muse, Mariah
Choflet, Amanda
Sakaue, Kousuke
Sugiyama, Shinya
Utsunomiya, Kazuki
Wong, John W.
McNutt, Todd R.
Quon, Harry
author_facet Cheng, Zhi
Nakatsugawa, Minoru
Hu, Chen
Robertson, Scott P.
Hui, Xuan
Moore, Joseph A.
Bowers, Michael R.
Kiess, Ana P.
Page, Brandi R.
Burns, Laura
Muse, Mariah
Choflet, Amanda
Sakaue, Kousuke
Sugiyama, Shinya
Utsunomiya, Kazuki
Wong, John W.
McNutt, Todd R.
Quon, Harry
author_sort Cheng, Zhi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We explore whether a knowledge–discovery approach building a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) prediction model for weight loss (WL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) is feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: HNC patients from 2007 to 2015 were identified from a prospectively collected database Oncospace. Two prediction models at different time points were developed to predict weight loss ≥5 kg at 3 months post-RT by CART algorithm: (1) during RT planning using patient demographic, delineated dose data, planning target volume–organs at risk shape relationships data and (2) at the end of treatment (EOT) using additional on-treatment toxicities and quality of life data. RESULTS: Among 391 patients identified, WL predictors during RT planning were International Classification of Diseases diagnosis; dose to masticatory and superior constrictor muscles, larynx, and parotid; and age. At EOT, patient-reported oral intake, diagnosis, N stage, nausea, pain, dose to larynx, parotid, and low-dose planning target volume–larynx distance were significant predictive factors. The area under the curve during RT and EOT was 0.773 and 0.821, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of an informatics infrastructure that has facilitated insight into the prediction of WL using the CART algorithm. The prediction accuracy significantly improved with the inclusion of additional treatment-related data and has the potential to be leveraged as a strategy to develop a learning health system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6127872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61278722018-09-07 Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy Cheng, Zhi Nakatsugawa, Minoru Hu, Chen Robertson, Scott P. Hui, Xuan Moore, Joseph A. Bowers, Michael R. Kiess, Ana P. Page, Brandi R. Burns, Laura Muse, Mariah Choflet, Amanda Sakaue, Kousuke Sugiyama, Shinya Utsunomiya, Kazuki Wong, John W. McNutt, Todd R. Quon, Harry Adv Radiat Oncol Head and Neck Cancer OBJECTIVE: We explore whether a knowledge–discovery approach building a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) prediction model for weight loss (WL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) is feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: HNC patients from 2007 to 2015 were identified from a prospectively collected database Oncospace. Two prediction models at different time points were developed to predict weight loss ≥5 kg at 3 months post-RT by CART algorithm: (1) during RT planning using patient demographic, delineated dose data, planning target volume–organs at risk shape relationships data and (2) at the end of treatment (EOT) using additional on-treatment toxicities and quality of life data. RESULTS: Among 391 patients identified, WL predictors during RT planning were International Classification of Diseases diagnosis; dose to masticatory and superior constrictor muscles, larynx, and parotid; and age. At EOT, patient-reported oral intake, diagnosis, N stage, nausea, pain, dose to larynx, parotid, and low-dose planning target volume–larynx distance were significant predictive factors. The area under the curve during RT and EOT was 0.773 and 0.821, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of an informatics infrastructure that has facilitated insight into the prediction of WL using the CART algorithm. The prediction accuracy significantly improved with the inclusion of additional treatment-related data and has the potential to be leveraged as a strategy to develop a learning health system. Elsevier 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6127872/ /pubmed/30197940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.11.006 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Head and Neck Cancer
Cheng, Zhi
Nakatsugawa, Minoru
Hu, Chen
Robertson, Scott P.
Hui, Xuan
Moore, Joseph A.
Bowers, Michael R.
Kiess, Ana P.
Page, Brandi R.
Burns, Laura
Muse, Mariah
Choflet, Amanda
Sakaue, Kousuke
Sugiyama, Shinya
Utsunomiya, Kazuki
Wong, John W.
McNutt, Todd R.
Quon, Harry
Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy
title Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy
title_full Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy
title_short Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy
title_sort evaluation of classification and regression tree (cart) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy
topic Head and Neck Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.11.006
work_keys_str_mv AT chengzhi evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT nakatsugawaminoru evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT huchen evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT robertsonscottp evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT huixuan evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT moorejosepha evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT bowersmichaelr evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT kiessanap evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT pagebrandir evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT burnslaura evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT musemariah evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT chofletamanda evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT sakauekousuke evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT sugiyamashinya evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT utsunomiyakazuki evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT wongjohnw evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT mcnutttoddr evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy
AT quonharry evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy