Cargando…
Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy
OBJECTIVE: We explore whether a knowledge–discovery approach building a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) prediction model for weight loss (WL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) is feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: HNC patients from 2007 to 2015 were i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.11.006 |
_version_ | 1783353547445764096 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Zhi Nakatsugawa, Minoru Hu, Chen Robertson, Scott P. Hui, Xuan Moore, Joseph A. Bowers, Michael R. Kiess, Ana P. Page, Brandi R. Burns, Laura Muse, Mariah Choflet, Amanda Sakaue, Kousuke Sugiyama, Shinya Utsunomiya, Kazuki Wong, John W. McNutt, Todd R. Quon, Harry |
author_facet | Cheng, Zhi Nakatsugawa, Minoru Hu, Chen Robertson, Scott P. Hui, Xuan Moore, Joseph A. Bowers, Michael R. Kiess, Ana P. Page, Brandi R. Burns, Laura Muse, Mariah Choflet, Amanda Sakaue, Kousuke Sugiyama, Shinya Utsunomiya, Kazuki Wong, John W. McNutt, Todd R. Quon, Harry |
author_sort | Cheng, Zhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We explore whether a knowledge–discovery approach building a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) prediction model for weight loss (WL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) is feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: HNC patients from 2007 to 2015 were identified from a prospectively collected database Oncospace. Two prediction models at different time points were developed to predict weight loss ≥5 kg at 3 months post-RT by CART algorithm: (1) during RT planning using patient demographic, delineated dose data, planning target volume–organs at risk shape relationships data and (2) at the end of treatment (EOT) using additional on-treatment toxicities and quality of life data. RESULTS: Among 391 patients identified, WL predictors during RT planning were International Classification of Diseases diagnosis; dose to masticatory and superior constrictor muscles, larynx, and parotid; and age. At EOT, patient-reported oral intake, diagnosis, N stage, nausea, pain, dose to larynx, parotid, and low-dose planning target volume–larynx distance were significant predictive factors. The area under the curve during RT and EOT was 0.773 and 0.821, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of an informatics infrastructure that has facilitated insight into the prediction of WL using the CART algorithm. The prediction accuracy significantly improved with the inclusion of additional treatment-related data and has the potential to be leveraged as a strategy to develop a learning health system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6127872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61278722018-09-07 Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy Cheng, Zhi Nakatsugawa, Minoru Hu, Chen Robertson, Scott P. Hui, Xuan Moore, Joseph A. Bowers, Michael R. Kiess, Ana P. Page, Brandi R. Burns, Laura Muse, Mariah Choflet, Amanda Sakaue, Kousuke Sugiyama, Shinya Utsunomiya, Kazuki Wong, John W. McNutt, Todd R. Quon, Harry Adv Radiat Oncol Head and Neck Cancer OBJECTIVE: We explore whether a knowledge–discovery approach building a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) prediction model for weight loss (WL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) is feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: HNC patients from 2007 to 2015 were identified from a prospectively collected database Oncospace. Two prediction models at different time points were developed to predict weight loss ≥5 kg at 3 months post-RT by CART algorithm: (1) during RT planning using patient demographic, delineated dose data, planning target volume–organs at risk shape relationships data and (2) at the end of treatment (EOT) using additional on-treatment toxicities and quality of life data. RESULTS: Among 391 patients identified, WL predictors during RT planning were International Classification of Diseases diagnosis; dose to masticatory and superior constrictor muscles, larynx, and parotid; and age. At EOT, patient-reported oral intake, diagnosis, N stage, nausea, pain, dose to larynx, parotid, and low-dose planning target volume–larynx distance were significant predictive factors. The area under the curve during RT and EOT was 0.773 and 0.821, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of an informatics infrastructure that has facilitated insight into the prediction of WL using the CART algorithm. The prediction accuracy significantly improved with the inclusion of additional treatment-related data and has the potential to be leveraged as a strategy to develop a learning health system. Elsevier 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6127872/ /pubmed/30197940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.11.006 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Cancer Cheng, Zhi Nakatsugawa, Minoru Hu, Chen Robertson, Scott P. Hui, Xuan Moore, Joseph A. Bowers, Michael R. Kiess, Ana P. Page, Brandi R. Burns, Laura Muse, Mariah Choflet, Amanda Sakaue, Kousuke Sugiyama, Shinya Utsunomiya, Kazuki Wong, John W. McNutt, Todd R. Quon, Harry Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy |
title | Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy |
title_full | Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy |
title_short | Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy |
title_sort | evaluation of classification and regression tree (cart) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy |
topic | Head and Neck Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.11.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengzhi evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT nakatsugawaminoru evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT huchen evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT robertsonscottp evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT huixuan evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT moorejosepha evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT bowersmichaelr evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT kiessanap evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT pagebrandir evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT burnslaura evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT musemariah evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT chofletamanda evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT sakauekousuke evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT sugiyamashinya evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT utsunomiyakazuki evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT wongjohnw evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT mcnutttoddr evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy AT quonharry evaluationofclassificationandregressiontreecartmodelinweightlosspredictionfollowingheadandneckcancerradiationtherapy |