Cargando…
Surgeons’ and methodologists’ perceptions of utilising an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely recognised to be the most rigorous way to test new and emerging clinical interventions. When the interventions under study are two different surgical procedures, however, surgeons are required to be trained and sufficiently proficient in the...
Autores principales: | Cook, Jonathan A., Campbell, Marion K., Gillies, Katie, Skea, Zoë |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30189868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2832-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Decision aids for randomised controlled trials: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders’ views
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
‘It's trying to manage the work’: a qualitative evaluation of recruitment processes within a UK multicentre trial
por: Skea, Zoë Christina, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Synthesizing existing evidence to design future trials: survey of methodologists from European institutions
por: Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Determining items for inclusion in a decision support intervention for clinical trial participation: a modified Delphi approach
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Patient information leaflets (PILs) for UK randomised controlled trials: a feasibility study exploring whether they contain information to support decision making about trial participation
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)