Cargando…
A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures
BACKGROUND: The most appropriate treatment of pathological fractures from metastatic disease depends on several factors, one of the most important being predicted life expectancy. The aim of this study was to identify the variables that influence prognosis and utilise these to develop a novel scorin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30189869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0931-x |
_version_ | 1783353555145457664 |
---|---|
author | Salim, Xiang D’Alessandro, Peter Little, James Mudhar, Kulvir Murray, Kevin Carey Smith, Richard Yates, Piers |
author_facet | Salim, Xiang D’Alessandro, Peter Little, James Mudhar, Kulvir Murray, Kevin Carey Smith, Richard Yates, Piers |
author_sort | Salim, Xiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The most appropriate treatment of pathological fractures from metastatic disease depends on several factors, one of the most important being predicted life expectancy. The aim of this study was to identify the variables that influence prognosis and utilise these to develop a novel scoring system to better predict life expectancy post-pathological fracture. METHODS: The records of all patients that presented with metastatic pathological fractures over a 10-year period from the only tertiary orthopaedic departments in Western Australia were retrospectively examined. Variables assessed were primary cancer type, fracture site, fixation method, cement augmentation, pre-morbid level of physical functioning, complication rate, treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy and appendicular, spinal and visceral metastatic load. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were included. Median survival from fracture to death was 4.1 months. Median time from cancer diagnosis to pathological fracture was 14.2 months. There was a statistically significant association between patient survival and primary cancer type, physical functional score, spinal metastatic burden and use of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: A novel scoring system has been developed that offers a survival probability based on patient’s individual circumstances. This can guide specialist management and offer patients a more accurate expectation of functional outcome and survival time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6127912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61279122018-09-10 A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures Salim, Xiang D’Alessandro, Peter Little, James Mudhar, Kulvir Murray, Kevin Carey Smith, Richard Yates, Piers J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The most appropriate treatment of pathological fractures from metastatic disease depends on several factors, one of the most important being predicted life expectancy. The aim of this study was to identify the variables that influence prognosis and utilise these to develop a novel scoring system to better predict life expectancy post-pathological fracture. METHODS: The records of all patients that presented with metastatic pathological fractures over a 10-year period from the only tertiary orthopaedic departments in Western Australia were retrospectively examined. Variables assessed were primary cancer type, fracture site, fixation method, cement augmentation, pre-morbid level of physical functioning, complication rate, treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy and appendicular, spinal and visceral metastatic load. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were included. Median survival from fracture to death was 4.1 months. Median time from cancer diagnosis to pathological fracture was 14.2 months. There was a statistically significant association between patient survival and primary cancer type, physical functional score, spinal metastatic burden and use of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: A novel scoring system has been developed that offers a survival probability based on patient’s individual circumstances. This can guide specialist management and offer patients a more accurate expectation of functional outcome and survival time. BioMed Central 2018-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6127912/ /pubmed/30189869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0931-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Salim, Xiang D’Alessandro, Peter Little, James Mudhar, Kulvir Murray, Kevin Carey Smith, Richard Yates, Piers A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures |
title | A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures |
title_full | A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures |
title_fullStr | A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures |
title_short | A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures |
title_sort | novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30189869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0931-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salimxiang anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT dalessandropeter anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT littlejames anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT mudharkulvir anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT murraykevin anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT careysmithrichard anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT yatespiers anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT salimxiang novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT dalessandropeter novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT littlejames novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT mudharkulvir novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT murraykevin novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT careysmithrichard novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures AT yatespiers novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures |