Cargando…

A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate treatment of pathological fractures from metastatic disease depends on several factors, one of the most important being predicted life expectancy. The aim of this study was to identify the variables that influence prognosis and utilise these to develop a novel scorin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salim, Xiang, D’Alessandro, Peter, Little, James, Mudhar, Kulvir, Murray, Kevin, Carey Smith, Richard, Yates, Piers
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30189869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0931-x
_version_ 1783353555145457664
author Salim, Xiang
D’Alessandro, Peter
Little, James
Mudhar, Kulvir
Murray, Kevin
Carey Smith, Richard
Yates, Piers
author_facet Salim, Xiang
D’Alessandro, Peter
Little, James
Mudhar, Kulvir
Murray, Kevin
Carey Smith, Richard
Yates, Piers
author_sort Salim, Xiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most appropriate treatment of pathological fractures from metastatic disease depends on several factors, one of the most important being predicted life expectancy. The aim of this study was to identify the variables that influence prognosis and utilise these to develop a novel scoring system to better predict life expectancy post-pathological fracture. METHODS: The records of all patients that presented with metastatic pathological fractures over a 10-year period from the only tertiary orthopaedic departments in Western Australia were retrospectively examined. Variables assessed were primary cancer type, fracture site, fixation method, cement augmentation, pre-morbid level of physical functioning, complication rate, treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy and appendicular, spinal and visceral metastatic load. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were included. Median survival from fracture to death was 4.1 months. Median time from cancer diagnosis to pathological fracture was 14.2 months. There was a statistically significant association between patient survival and primary cancer type, physical functional score, spinal metastatic burden and use of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: A novel scoring system has been developed that offers a survival probability based on patient’s individual circumstances. This can guide specialist management and offer patients a more accurate expectation of functional outcome and survival time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6127912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61279122018-09-10 A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures Salim, Xiang D’Alessandro, Peter Little, James Mudhar, Kulvir Murray, Kevin Carey Smith, Richard Yates, Piers J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The most appropriate treatment of pathological fractures from metastatic disease depends on several factors, one of the most important being predicted life expectancy. The aim of this study was to identify the variables that influence prognosis and utilise these to develop a novel scoring system to better predict life expectancy post-pathological fracture. METHODS: The records of all patients that presented with metastatic pathological fractures over a 10-year period from the only tertiary orthopaedic departments in Western Australia were retrospectively examined. Variables assessed were primary cancer type, fracture site, fixation method, cement augmentation, pre-morbid level of physical functioning, complication rate, treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy and appendicular, spinal and visceral metastatic load. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were included. Median survival from fracture to death was 4.1 months. Median time from cancer diagnosis to pathological fracture was 14.2 months. There was a statistically significant association between patient survival and primary cancer type, physical functional score, spinal metastatic burden and use of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: A novel scoring system has been developed that offers a survival probability based on patient’s individual circumstances. This can guide specialist management and offer patients a more accurate expectation of functional outcome and survival time. BioMed Central 2018-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6127912/ /pubmed/30189869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0931-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salim, Xiang
D’Alessandro, Peter
Little, James
Mudhar, Kulvir
Murray, Kevin
Carey Smith, Richard
Yates, Piers
A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures
title A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures
title_full A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures
title_fullStr A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures
title_full_unstemmed A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures
title_short A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures
title_sort novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30189869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0931-x
work_keys_str_mv AT salimxiang anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT dalessandropeter anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT littlejames anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT mudharkulvir anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT murraykevin anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT careysmithrichard anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT yatespiers anovelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT salimxiang novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT dalessandropeter novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT littlejames novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT mudharkulvir novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT murraykevin novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT careysmithrichard novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures
AT yatespiers novelscoringsystemtoguideprognosisinpatientswithpathologicalfractures