Cargando…

Assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills: a validity study

BACKGROUND: Standardised courses for laypeople in Paediatric Basic Life Support (PBLS) and Foreign Body Airway Obstruction Management (FBAOM) teach essential skills for the initiation of resuscitation by bystanders. Performance assessments are necessary to ensure that skills are acquired. We aimed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasselager, Asbjørn, Østergaard, Doris, Kristensen, Tim, Sønderskov, Claus, Bohnstedt, Cathrine, Lauritsen, Torsten L. B., Konge, Lars, Tolsgaard, Martin G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30189887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0544-8
_version_ 1783353560131436544
author Hasselager, Asbjørn
Østergaard, Doris
Kristensen, Tim
Sønderskov, Claus
Bohnstedt, Cathrine
Lauritsen, Torsten L. B.
Konge, Lars
Tolsgaard, Martin G.
author_facet Hasselager, Asbjørn
Østergaard, Doris
Kristensen, Tim
Sønderskov, Claus
Bohnstedt, Cathrine
Lauritsen, Torsten L. B.
Konge, Lars
Tolsgaard, Martin G.
author_sort Hasselager, Asbjørn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standardised courses for laypeople in Paediatric Basic Life Support (PBLS) and Foreign Body Airway Obstruction Management (FBAOM) teach essential skills for the initiation of resuscitation by bystanders. Performance assessments are necessary to ensure that skills are acquired. We aimed to examine the validity of developed performance assessments and to determine credible pass/fail standards. METHODS: Validity evidence was gathered in a standardised simulated setting by testing participants with three different levels of PBLS/FBAOM experience: untrained laypersons, trained laypersons, and lifeguards. Two blinded raters assessed participants’ performance. The reliability of test scores was analysed using generalizability theory, scores were compared across the three groups, and pass/fail-standards were established. RESULTS: A total of 33 participants were included. More than two raters and two cases were necessary for PBLS to achieve a reliability coefficient above 0.80, which is considered the minimally acceptable level for high-stakes certification. For FBAOM, two tests or three raters were needed. Assessment scores differed across the three groups for PBLS skills, as well as for FBAOM skills (p < 0.001). Pass levels of 74% and 55% of the maximum score for PBLS and FBAOM, respectively, were identified as the levels that best discriminated between competent and non-competent laypersons. CONCLUSIONS: Laypersons’ PBLS and FBAOM skills can be assessed in a reliable and valid way in a standardised simulated setting. However, multiple raters and scenario tests are needed to ensure sufficient reliability, which raises questions regarding the feasibility of performing certification tests for laypersons who participate in short paediatric resuscitation courses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0544-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6127933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61279332018-09-10 Assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills: a validity study Hasselager, Asbjørn Østergaard, Doris Kristensen, Tim Sønderskov, Claus Bohnstedt, Cathrine Lauritsen, Torsten L. B. Konge, Lars Tolsgaard, Martin G. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Standardised courses for laypeople in Paediatric Basic Life Support (PBLS) and Foreign Body Airway Obstruction Management (FBAOM) teach essential skills for the initiation of resuscitation by bystanders. Performance assessments are necessary to ensure that skills are acquired. We aimed to examine the validity of developed performance assessments and to determine credible pass/fail standards. METHODS: Validity evidence was gathered in a standardised simulated setting by testing participants with three different levels of PBLS/FBAOM experience: untrained laypersons, trained laypersons, and lifeguards. Two blinded raters assessed participants’ performance. The reliability of test scores was analysed using generalizability theory, scores were compared across the three groups, and pass/fail-standards were established. RESULTS: A total of 33 participants were included. More than two raters and two cases were necessary for PBLS to achieve a reliability coefficient above 0.80, which is considered the minimally acceptable level for high-stakes certification. For FBAOM, two tests or three raters were needed. Assessment scores differed across the three groups for PBLS skills, as well as for FBAOM skills (p < 0.001). Pass levels of 74% and 55% of the maximum score for PBLS and FBAOM, respectively, were identified as the levels that best discriminated between competent and non-competent laypersons. CONCLUSIONS: Laypersons’ PBLS and FBAOM skills can be assessed in a reliable and valid way in a standardised simulated setting. However, multiple raters and scenario tests are needed to ensure sufficient reliability, which raises questions regarding the feasibility of performing certification tests for laypersons who participate in short paediatric resuscitation courses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0544-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6127933/ /pubmed/30189887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0544-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hasselager, Asbjørn
Østergaard, Doris
Kristensen, Tim
Sønderskov, Claus
Bohnstedt, Cathrine
Lauritsen, Torsten L. B.
Konge, Lars
Tolsgaard, Martin G.
Assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills: a validity study
title Assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills: a validity study
title_full Assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills: a validity study
title_fullStr Assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills: a validity study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills: a validity study
title_short Assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills: a validity study
title_sort assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills: a validity study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30189887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0544-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hasselagerasbjørn assessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportandforeignbodyairwayobstructionmanagementskillsavaliditystudy
AT østergaarddoris assessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportandforeignbodyairwayobstructionmanagementskillsavaliditystudy
AT kristensentim assessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportandforeignbodyairwayobstructionmanagementskillsavaliditystudy
AT sønderskovclaus assessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportandforeignbodyairwayobstructionmanagementskillsavaliditystudy
AT bohnstedtcathrine assessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportandforeignbodyairwayobstructionmanagementskillsavaliditystudy
AT lauritsentorstenlb assessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportandforeignbodyairwayobstructionmanagementskillsavaliditystudy
AT kongelars assessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportandforeignbodyairwayobstructionmanagementskillsavaliditystudy
AT tolsgaardmarting assessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportandforeignbodyairwayobstructionmanagementskillsavaliditystudy