Cargando…
Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services
BACKGROUND: Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services are the dominant service model in the treatment of first-episode psychosis. They are a time-limited intervention and little is known about discharge destinations and outcomes once EIP treatment has concluded. AIMS: To understand discharge pa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.50 |
_version_ | 1783353566553964544 |
---|---|
author | Puntis, Stephen Oke, Jason Lennox, Belinda |
author_facet | Puntis, Stephen Oke, Jason Lennox, Belinda |
author_sort | Puntis, Stephen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services are the dominant service model in the treatment of first-episode psychosis. They are a time-limited intervention and little is known about discharge destinations and outcomes once EIP treatment has concluded. AIMS: To understand discharge pathways and predictors of relapse in an EIP service. METHOD: We collected data on all patients with an electronic health record treated by EIP services in Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust in the UK between 12 January 2006 and 7 March 2017 (n = 701). Our primary outcomes were discharge destination at end of treatment and relapse. RESULTS: Most patients (83.5%) were discharged to primary care. Transfer to secondary care was associated with previous in-patient admissions (odds ratio (OR) = 1.92, 95% CI 1.54–2.39) and longer EIP treatment (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03–1.06). Relapse rate was highest shortly after leaving EIP services. Relapse was associated with transfer to secondary care (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.75, 95% CI 1.75–4.31), higher deprivation (HR = 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01–1.05), a substance misuse disorder (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.26) and a comorbid diagnosis of a personality disorder (HR = 2.96, 95% CI 1.39–6.29). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients treated by the EIP service in Oxfordshire did not receive ongoing mental healthcare from secondary mental health services. We identified high deprivation and those with substance misuse problems or personality disorders as EIP populations with a high risk of relapse. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6127960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61279602018-09-10 Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services Puntis, Stephen Oke, Jason Lennox, Belinda BJPsych Open Papers BACKGROUND: Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services are the dominant service model in the treatment of first-episode psychosis. They are a time-limited intervention and little is known about discharge destinations and outcomes once EIP treatment has concluded. AIMS: To understand discharge pathways and predictors of relapse in an EIP service. METHOD: We collected data on all patients with an electronic health record treated by EIP services in Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust in the UK between 12 January 2006 and 7 March 2017 (n = 701). Our primary outcomes were discharge destination at end of treatment and relapse. RESULTS: Most patients (83.5%) were discharged to primary care. Transfer to secondary care was associated with previous in-patient admissions (odds ratio (OR) = 1.92, 95% CI 1.54–2.39) and longer EIP treatment (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03–1.06). Relapse rate was highest shortly after leaving EIP services. Relapse was associated with transfer to secondary care (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.75, 95% CI 1.75–4.31), higher deprivation (HR = 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01–1.05), a substance misuse disorder (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.26) and a comorbid diagnosis of a personality disorder (HR = 2.96, 95% CI 1.39–6.29). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients treated by the EIP service in Oxfordshire did not receive ongoing mental healthcare from secondary mental health services. We identified high deprivation and those with substance misuse problems or personality disorders as EIP populations with a high risk of relapse. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. Cambridge University Press 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6127960/ /pubmed/30202598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.50 Text en © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Papers Puntis, Stephen Oke, Jason Lennox, Belinda Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services |
title | Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services |
title_full | Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services |
title_fullStr | Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services |
title_full_unstemmed | Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services |
title_short | Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services |
title_sort | discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services |
topic | Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.50 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puntisstephen dischargepathwaysandrelapsefollowingtreatmentfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisservices AT okejason dischargepathwaysandrelapsefollowingtreatmentfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisservices AT lennoxbelinda dischargepathwaysandrelapsefollowingtreatmentfromearlyinterventioninpsychosisservices |