Cargando…

Psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review

BACKGROUND: Adjunctive psychological interventions for bipolar disorder have demonstrated better efficacy in preventing or delaying relapse and improving outcomes compared with pharmacotherapy alone. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demissie, Mekdes, Hanlon, Charlotte, Birhane, Rahel, Ng, Lauren, Medhin, Girmay, Fekadu, Abebaw
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.46
_version_ 1783353567020580864
author Demissie, Mekdes
Hanlon, Charlotte
Birhane, Rahel
Ng, Lauren
Medhin, Girmay
Fekadu, Abebaw
author_facet Demissie, Mekdes
Hanlon, Charlotte
Birhane, Rahel
Ng, Lauren
Medhin, Girmay
Fekadu, Abebaw
author_sort Demissie, Mekdes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adjunctive psychological interventions for bipolar disorder have demonstrated better efficacy in preventing or delaying relapse and improving outcomes compared with pharmacotherapy alone. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane database for systematic review, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Latin America and Caribbean Center on Health Science Literature and African Journals Online databases with no restriction of language or year of publication. Methodological heterogeneity of studies precluded meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 18 adjunctive studies were identified: psychoeducation (n = 14), family intervention (n = 1), group cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) (n = 2) and group mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) (n = 1). In total, 16 of the 18 studies were from upper-middle-income countries and none from low-income countries. All used mental health specialists or experienced therapists to deliver the intervention. Most of the studies have moderately high risk of bias. Psychoeducation improved treatment adherence, knowledge of and attitudes towards bipolar disorder and quality of life, and led to decreased relapse rates and hospital admissions. Family psychoeducation prevented relapse, decreased hospital admissions and improved medication adherence. CBT reduced both depressive and manic symptoms. MBCT reduced emotional dysregulation. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive psychological interventions alongside pharmacotherapy appear to improve the clinical outcome and quality of life of people with bipolar disorder in middle-income countries. Further studies are required to investigate contextual adaptation and the role of non-specialists in the provision of psychological interventions to ensure scalability and the efficacy of these interventions in low-income country settings. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6127962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61279622018-09-10 Psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review Demissie, Mekdes Hanlon, Charlotte Birhane, Rahel Ng, Lauren Medhin, Girmay Fekadu, Abebaw BJPsych Open Review BACKGROUND: Adjunctive psychological interventions for bipolar disorder have demonstrated better efficacy in preventing or delaying relapse and improving outcomes compared with pharmacotherapy alone. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane database for systematic review, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Latin America and Caribbean Center on Health Science Literature and African Journals Online databases with no restriction of language or year of publication. Methodological heterogeneity of studies precluded meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 18 adjunctive studies were identified: psychoeducation (n = 14), family intervention (n = 1), group cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) (n = 2) and group mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) (n = 1). In total, 16 of the 18 studies were from upper-middle-income countries and none from low-income countries. All used mental health specialists or experienced therapists to deliver the intervention. Most of the studies have moderately high risk of bias. Psychoeducation improved treatment adherence, knowledge of and attitudes towards bipolar disorder and quality of life, and led to decreased relapse rates and hospital admissions. Family psychoeducation prevented relapse, decreased hospital admissions and improved medication adherence. CBT reduced both depressive and manic symptoms. MBCT reduced emotional dysregulation. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive psychological interventions alongside pharmacotherapy appear to improve the clinical outcome and quality of life of people with bipolar disorder in middle-income countries. Further studies are required to investigate contextual adaptation and the role of non-specialists in the provision of psychological interventions to ensure scalability and the efficacy of these interventions in low-income country settings. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. Cambridge University Press 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6127962/ /pubmed/30202599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.46 Text en © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Review
Demissie, Mekdes
Hanlon, Charlotte
Birhane, Rahel
Ng, Lauren
Medhin, Girmay
Fekadu, Abebaw
Psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
title Psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
title_full Psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
title_fullStr Psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
title_short Psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
title_sort psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.46
work_keys_str_mv AT demissiemekdes psychologicalinterventionsforbipolardisorderinlowandmiddleincomecountriessystematicreview
AT hanloncharlotte psychologicalinterventionsforbipolardisorderinlowandmiddleincomecountriessystematicreview
AT birhanerahel psychologicalinterventionsforbipolardisorderinlowandmiddleincomecountriessystematicreview
AT nglauren psychologicalinterventionsforbipolardisorderinlowandmiddleincomecountriessystematicreview
AT medhingirmay psychologicalinterventionsforbipolardisorderinlowandmiddleincomecountriessystematicreview
AT fekaduabebaw psychologicalinterventionsforbipolardisorderinlowandmiddleincomecountriessystematicreview